+9.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
117 of 1,415tied with 50 others
Score vs region
+13.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
31 of 352tied with 6 others
Score vs county
+10.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
10 of 59tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+12.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,761 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
271 of 4,761tied with 127 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
83%vs 57.5% avg · +25.5 pts
Masters
56%vs 26.3% avg · +29.7 pts
Among 1,373 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Stanton-Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 117th of 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).
Stanton-Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 31st of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 6 others).
Stanton-Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 59 rated schools in Smith County (tied with 1 other).
Stanton-Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 271st of 4,761 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 127 others).
Stanton-Smith Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,373 reporting
School Progress93 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,359 reporting
Academic Growth90 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 1,345 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
Stanton-Smith Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
90
A
—
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (93) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Meets grade level83%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Masters grade level56%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Meets grade level81%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Masters grade level58%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Meets grade level83%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Masters grade level52%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Meets grade level86%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Masters grade level64%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
536
Economically disadvantaged
41.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.9%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.2%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.3%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Stanton-Smith Elem
African American 12.1%
Hispanic 14.6%
White 62.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 36.1%
White 45.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
535
Economically disadvantaged students
220
Emergent bilingual students
21
Special education students
135
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
52
Students in TEA mobility denominator
441
TEA-published mobility rate
11.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 536 students in 2025–26, an increase of 50 (10.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
536
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+50
Increase · +10.3%
Change since 2021–22
+26
Increase · +5.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
536
Selected comparison
702.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,383 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Stanton-Smith Elem
School year
Students enrolledStanton-Smith Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
510
First available year
701.2
2022–23
515
Increase of 5 (1.0%)
708.2
2023–24
514
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
709.3
2024–25
486
Decrease of 28 (5.4%)
706.3
2025–26
536
Increase of 50 (10.3%)
702.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
24
4.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
42
8.03 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
523
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.6%
Selected comparison
10.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,094 rated schools reporting
−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
8.03
Selected comparison
23.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 rated schools reporting
−15.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stanton-Smith Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
517
52
10.1%
90
17.41
9.1%
17.1
2021–22
546
58
10.6%
142
26.01
11.0%
23.4
2022–23
534
58
10.9%
135
25.28
11.4%
24.8
2023–24
547
39
7.1%
75
13.71
11.2%
25.1
2024–25
523
24
4.6%
42
8.03
10.8%
23.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stanton-Smith Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
24
4.6%
42
8.03
10.8%
23.5
In-school suspensions
24
4.6%
42
8.03
9.7%
18.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Stanton-Smith Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,268
Selected comparison
$11,957
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,385 rated schools reporting
−$2,689 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,268 per student for this campus, $14,221 per student for its parent district, Whitehouse ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Stanton-Smith Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,379
$24,241
$13,054
$7,807
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,266 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,320
$12,453
$13,108
$8,014
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,285 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,447
$10,251
$14,058
$8,386
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,294 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,501
$11,525
$14,797
$8,788
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,312 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,571
$12,702
$15,708
$10,115
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,327 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,034
$12,785
$16,792
$10,598
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,347 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,859
$13,988
$18,125
$11,695
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,364 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,268
$14,221
$18,972
$11,957
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,385 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,049−$2,299 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−9.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.6+0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Stanton-Smith Elem
Beginning 16.4%
1 to 5 years 5.5%
6 to 10 years 24.7%
11 to 20 years 39.5%
21 to 30 years 11.2%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Stanton-Smith Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classStanton-Smith Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
18
18
Grade 1
18.3
18.6
Grade 2
19.8
18.8
Grade 3
20
19.5
Grade 4
20.8
19.3
Grade 5
19.6
20.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
9 measures
2of 55
All Subjects — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 55
All Subjects — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
2of 55
Reading — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 55
Math — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 48
Science — Meets
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
2of 48
Science — Masters
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure
3of 55
Reading — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure
3of 55
Reading — Meets
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 55
Math — Masters
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
4of 57
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
4of 55
All Subjects — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 55
Math — Approaches
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 57
Attendance
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 50
Academic Growth
Smith County · of the 50 that report this measure
7of 48
Science — Approaches
Smith County · of the 48 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 59
Overall score
Smith County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 55
Closing the Gaps
Smith County · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
67of 1,369
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,369 that report this measure · tied with 24
190of 4,557
Student Achievement
Similar size · of the 4,557 that report this measure · tied with 85
215of 4,557
School Progress
Similar size · of the 4,557 that report this measure · tied with 81
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212906114.