Recent movement
Overall score rose 15 points
64 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Southeast Elem
Nolan County · Region 14: Abilene · 157 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 79/1002025-26
- Change
- +6 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +0.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,063 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,063 of 2,063tied with 85 others
- Score vs region
- −1.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene
- Region 14: Abilene placement
- 74 of 122tied with 3 others
- Score vs county
- +0.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 12 rated schools in Nolan County
- Nolan County placement
- 6 of 12tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- −2.8 ptsvs 81.8 average · 848 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 544 of 848tied with 30 others
- Score vs state
- −2.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 4,679 of 7,646tied with 283 others
C79
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 78.8 average for 2,063 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene.The current score is level with the 78.8 average for 12 rated schools in Nolan County.The current score is below the 81.8 average for 848 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 15 points
64 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 15 points
64 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 15 points
64 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 15 points
64 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Southeast Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 78.8 average for 2,063 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,063rd of 2,063 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 85 others).
Southeast Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 74th of 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene (tied with 3 others).
Southeast Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 78.8 average for 12 rated schools in Nolan County. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 12 rated schools in Nolan County (tied with 1 other).
Southeast Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.8 average for 848 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 544th of 848 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 30 others).
Southeast Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4,679th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 283 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 79 | 78.8 2,063 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 64 | 78.3 2,045 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 64 | 76.2 2,033 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 69 | 76.8 2,007 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 73 | 81.8 1,991 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Southeast Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,063 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 157
- Economically disadvantaged
- 73.4%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.2%−17.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 13.0%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- —
- Chronically absent
- —
Student demographics
Southeast Elem
- African American 3.9%
- Hispanic 51.3%
- White 38.3%
- Asian 1.9%
- Two or More Races 4.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 reporting for every category shown · 2,063 in full cohort
- African American 12.8%
- Hispanic 60.4%
- White 21.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
- African American 4.1%
- Hispanic 36.9%
- White 54.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Nolan County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- African American 4.7%
- Hispanic 47.7%
- White 43.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 848 reporting for every category shown · 848 in full cohort
- African American 6.6%
- Hispanic 45.4%
- White 43.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 154
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 113
- Emergent bilingual students
- 8
- Special education students
- 20
TEA context labels
- Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- Not reported
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- Not reported
- TEA-published mobility rate
- Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 157 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 157
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- 0
No change
- Change since 2021–22
- −101
Decrease · −39.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 157
- Selected comparison
- 638.8
| School year | Students enrolledSoutheast Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 258 | First available year | 655.4 |
| 2022–23 | 265 | Increase of 7 (2.7%) | 659.7 |
| 2023–24 | 243 | Decrease of 22 (8.3%) | 657.8 |
| 2024–25 | 157 | Decrease of 86 (35.4%) | 654.9 |
| 2025–26 | 157 | No change | 638.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 167
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 312 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 296 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 291 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 281 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 167 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Southeast Elem
- Parent district: Sweetwater ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $11,070
- Selected comparison
- $13,166
For 2025, TEA reported $11,070 per student for this campus, $34,564 per student for its parent district, Sweetwater ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Southeast Elem | Parent district: Sweetwater ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,374 | $11,884 | $13,054 | $8,056 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,915 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,197 | $11,931 | $13,108 | $8,197 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,423 | $13,244 | $14,058 | $8,749 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,728 | $14,060 | $14,797 | $9,292 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,970 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $10,014 | $13,667 | $15,708 | $10,590 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,990 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $9,161 | $16,317 | $16,792 | $11,212 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,007 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,374 | $23,395 | $18,125 | $12,336 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,031 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $11,070 | $34,564 | $18,972 | $13,166 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,043 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $55,419−$11,156 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 11−32.3 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 14±0.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Southeast Elem
- 1 to 5 years 54.5%
- 6 to 10 years 9.1%
- 11 to 20 years 9.1%
- 21 to 30 years 18.2%
- Over 30 years 9.1%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 reporting for every category shown · 2,063 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 27.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.3%
- Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.7%
- 1 to 5 years 25.9%
- 6 to 10 years 16.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.6%
- Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison average For Nolan County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.2%
- 1 to 5 years 35.8%
- 6 to 10 years 12.9%
- 11 to 20 years 17.5%
- 21 to 30 years 10.8%
- Over 30 years 7.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 848 reporting for every category shown · 848 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 23.1%
- 6 to 10 years 17%
- 11 to 20 years 28%
- 21 to 30 years 17.9%
- Over 30 years 6.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSoutheast Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 24.6 | 18 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 1 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 10 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
-
6of 12
Overall score
Nolan County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 12
Per-student spending
Nolan County · of the 12 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 177902105.