Top placement
Earned an industry-based certification
90.4% 2nd of 246 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability
South Palm Gardens HS
Hidalgo County · Region 01: Edinburg · 65 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 95/1002025-26
- Change
- +4 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +17.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 31 of 2,114tied with 7 others
- Score vs region
- +9.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
- Region 01: Edinburg placement
- 29 of 505tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- +10.5 ptsvs 84.5 average · 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County
- Hidalgo County placement
- 10 of 253tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +12.2 ptsvs 82.8 average · 171 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 19 of 171tied with 3 others
- Score vs state
- +13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 100 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County.The current score is above the 82.8 average for 171 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
95 +17.4 pts vs 77.6
- 95 is 17.4 points above the 77.6 average among 2,114 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average
92 +17.1 pts vs 74.9
- 92 is 17.1 points above the 74.9 average among 1,946 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Top placement
Earned an industry-based certification
90.4% 3rd of 86 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Region 01: Edinburg average
95 +9.3 pts vs 85.7
- 95 is 9.3 points above the 85.7 average among 505 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Region 01: Edinburg average
92 +8.8 pts vs 83.2
- 92 is 8.8 points above the 83.2 average among 487 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Top placement
Earned an industry-based certification
90.4% 2nd of 42 schools in Hidalgo County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Hidalgo County average
95 +10.5 pts vs 84.5
- 95 is 10.5 points above the 84.5 average among 253 schools in Hidalgo County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Hidalgo County average
92 +10.2 pts vs 81.8
- 92 is 10.2 points above the 81.8 average among 240 schools in Hidalgo County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
95 +12.2 pts vs 82.8
- 95 is 12.2 points above the 82.8 average among 171 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-size average
94 +12.1 pts vs 81.9
- 94 is 12.1 points above the 81.9 average among 148 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-size average
96 +14.9 pts vs 81.1
- 96 is 14.9 points above the 81.1 average among 152 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Overall score above the Texas average
95 +13.7 pts vs 81.3
- 95 is 13.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Texas average
92 +13.3 pts vs 78.7
- 92 is 13.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas average
94 +12.8 pts vs 81.2
- 94 is 12.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
South Palm Gardens HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 31st of 2,114 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 7 others).
South Palm Gardens HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 4 others).
South Palm Gardens HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.5 average for 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 253 rated schools in Hidalgo County (tied with 1 other).
South Palm Gardens HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.8 average for 171 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 171 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 3 others).
South Palm Gardens HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 247th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 131 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 100 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 95 | 77.6 2,114 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 97 | 77.3 2,096 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 94 | 73.8 2,078 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | A | 97 | 73.4 2,071 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 91 | 81.8 2,045 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- South Palm Gardens HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,114 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 96 | A | — |
| School Progress | 94 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 92 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 94 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so School Progress (94) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,114 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 94.5%+29.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 47 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 99.3%+30.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 47 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 99.4%+30.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 47 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.0%−6.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 47 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 93.0%+9.3 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 93.0% | 83.7% | +9.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 245 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 4.2% | 56.8% | −52.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 2.4% | 19.3% | −16.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.6% | 13.1% | −12.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 4.2% | 26.7% | −22.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 90.4% | 33.3% | +57.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.6% | 2.9% | −2.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 6.7% | −6.7 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.6% | 6.1% | −5.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.6% | 2.5% | −1.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 4.8% | 7.4% | −2.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.6% | 2.5% | −1.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 246 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 161
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 14
8.7% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 141
87.6% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 6
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 161
- Selected comparison
- 263.8
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 14
- Selected comparison
- 99.9
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 8.7%
- Selected comparison
- 36.3%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 87.6%
- Selected comparison
- 55.6%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 3.7%
- Selected comparison
- 8.1%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE (031034)12
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 65
- Economically disadvantaged
- 92.3%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 41.5%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 3.1%−14.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 97.3%+4.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 5.6%−17.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
South Palm Gardens HS
- Hispanic 98.5%
- White 1.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,114 reporting for every category shown · 2,114 in full cohort
- African American 14.9%
- Hispanic 76.3%
- White 5.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.5%
- White 1.9%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.8%
- White 1.5%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 171 reporting for every category shown · 171 in full cohort
- African American 9%
- Hispanic 49.5%
- White 37%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 65
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 60
- Emergent bilingual students
- 27
- Special education students
- 2
TEA context labels
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 164
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 172
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 95.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 65 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (9.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 65
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −7
Decrease · −9.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- −1
Decrease · −1.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 65
- Selected comparison
- 571.2
| School year | Students enrolledSouth Palm Gardens HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 66 | First available year | 616.4 |
| 2022–23 | 65 | Decrease of 1 (1.5%) | 612.9 |
| 2023–24 | 66 | Increase of 1 (1.5%) | 603.1 |
| 2024–25 | 72 | Increase of 6 (9.1%) | 596.3 |
| 2025–26 | 65 | Decrease of 7 (9.7%) | 571.2 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 170
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 174 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 190 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 168 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 164 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 170 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- South Palm Gardens HS
- Parent district: Weslaco ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $20,423
- Selected comparison
- $13,202
For 2025, TEA reported $20,423 per student for this campus, $16,073 per student for its parent district, Weslaco ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | South Palm Gardens HS | Parent district: Weslaco ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $20,394 | $12,128 | $13,054 | $8,317 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,994 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $17,038 | $11,764 | $13,108 | $8,335 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,021 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $38,789 | $11,593 | $14,058 | $8,840 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,025 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $18,536 | $12,217 | $14,797 | $9,649 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,028 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $20,759 | $13,586 | $15,708 | $11,225 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,045 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $21,616 | $13,547 | $16,792 | $11,731 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $20,825 | $13,798 | $18,125 | $12,647 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,081 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $20,423 | $16,073 | $18,972 | $13,202 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $71,943+$3,671 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 6−34.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.5−3.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
South Palm Gardens HS
- 11 to 20 years 64.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.9%
- Over 30 years 17.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,114 reporting for every category shown · 2,114 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.8%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.8%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 35%
- 21 to 30 years 22.6%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Hidalgo County · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.3%
- 1 to 5 years 18.4%
- 6 to 10 years 17.1%
- 11 to 20 years 37.2%
- 21 to 30 years 21.6%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 171 reporting for every category shown · 171 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.5%
- 1 to 5 years 21.9%
- 6 to 10 years 15.1%
- 11 to 20 years 25.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 6.9%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 187 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
-
2of 246
Earned an industry-based certification
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 246 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
-
4of 251
Per-student spending
Hidalgo County · of the 251 that report this measure
-
5of 145
Attendance
Similar size · of the 145 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 53
Five-Year Completion Rate
Similar size (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 53 that report this measure
-
6of 47
Six-Year Completion Rate
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 47 that report this measure
-
8of 92
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Similar size · of the 92 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
9of 242
Student Achievement
Hidalgo County · of the 242 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
10of 253
Overall score
Hidalgo County · of the 253 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
5 measures
-
11of 240
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Hidalgo County · of the 240 that report this measure
-
12of 241
Relative Performance
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
13of 241
School Progress
Hidalgo County · of the 241 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
26of 622
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 622 that report this measure · tied with 9
-
103of 1,956
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,956 that report this measure · tied with 23
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108913003.