+13.7 ptsvs 77.3 average · 2,377 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
130 of 2,377tied with 77 others
Score vs region
+12.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
58 of 650tied with 23 others
Score vs county
+13.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 401 rated schools in Bexar County
Bexar County placement
29 of 401tied with 12 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,606 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
571 of 4,606tied with 260 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.3 average for 2,377 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,606 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
57%vs 40.8% avg · +16.2 pts
Masters
28%vs 16% avg · +12 pts
Among 2,215 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Somerset JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.3 average for 2,377 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 130th of 2,377 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).
Somerset JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 58th of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 23 others).
Somerset JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 401 rated schools in Bexar County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 401 rated schools in Bexar County (tied with 12 others).
Somerset JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,606 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 571st of 4,606 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 260 others).
Somerset JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+14.1 vs similar economic context · 2,215 reporting
School Progress91 A+12.5 vs similar economic context · 2,208 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+16.5 vs similar economic context · 2,194 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+14.7 vs similar economic context · 2,165 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+14.3 vs similar economic context · 2,208 reporting
Somerset JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,377 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,215 reporting
Meets grade level57%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,215 reporting
Masters grade level28%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,215 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Meets grade level60%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
Meets grade level58%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
Masters grade level28%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 reporting
Meets grade level72%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 reporting
Masters grade level41%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,061 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level64%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 791 reporting
Meets grade level35%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 791 reporting
Masters grade level15%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 791 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,377 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
633
Economically disadvantaged
85.8%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.9%−33.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.1%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.6%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.5%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Somerset JH
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 92.7%
White 5.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,377 reporting for every category shown · 2,377 in full cohort
African American 14.3%
Hispanic 73.2%
White 8.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
African American 7%
Hispanic 75.9%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,606 reporting for every category shown · 4,606 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.4%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
633
Economically disadvantaged students
543
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
108
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
65
Students in TEA mobility denominator
646
TEA-published mobility rate
10.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 633 students in 2025–26, an increase of 25 (4.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
633
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+25
Increase · +4.1%
Change since 2021–22
+56
Increase · +9.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
633
Selected comparison
606.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,348 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Somerset JH
School year
Students enrolledSomerset JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
577
First available year
641.2
2022–23
619
Increase of 42 (7.3%)
638.5
2023–24
618
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
630.4
2024–25
608
Decrease of 10 (1.6%)
626.6
2025–26
633
Increase of 25 (4.1%)
606.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
128
19.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
345
53.57 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
644
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
19.9%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting
+6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
53.57
Selected comparison
32.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 rated schools reporting
+21.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Somerset JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
668
89
13.3%
140
20.96
7.7%
15
2021–22
635
139
21.9%
325
51.18
12.7%
30.3
2022–23
686
165
24.1%
448
65.31
13.6%
33.7
2023–24
659
132
20.0%
338
51.29
13.7%
33.9
2024–25
644
128
19.9%
345
53.57
13.3%
32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Somerset JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
128
19.9%
345
53.57
13.3%
32.1
In-school suspensions
94
14.6%
182
28.26
11.7%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
83
12.9%
146
22.67
8.7%
14.1
DAEP placements
16
2.5%
17
2.64
5.3%
6.4
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Somerset JH
Parent district: Somerset ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,053
Selected comparison
$13,291
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,362 rated schools reporting
−$3,238 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,053 per student for this campus, $14,579 per student for its parent district, Somerset ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Somerset JH
Parent district: Somerset ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,916
$12,790
$13,054
$8,269
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,239 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,263
$11,064
$13,108
$8,327
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,270 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,413
$12,278
$14,058
$8,850
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,280 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,472
$14,214
$14,797
$9,548
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,286 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,706
$17,540
$15,708
$11,033
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,306 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,276
$15,390
$16,792
$11,580
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,332 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,947
$16,410
$18,125
$12,533
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,347 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,053
$14,579
$18,972
$13,291
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,362 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,828+$4,168 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−6.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.7+3.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Somerset JH
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 36.7%
11 to 20 years 20.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,377 reporting for every category shown · 2,377 in full cohort
Beginning 7.2%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Bexar County · 401 reporting for every category shown · 401 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 24.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,606 reporting for every category shown · 4,606 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Somerset JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSomerset JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
19.3
15.2
Secondary math
19.2
16.6
Secondary science
22.1
17.9
Secondary social studies
18.9
17.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
13of 386
Relative Performance
Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 2
45of 2,061
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,061 that report this measure · tied with 3
60of 2,061
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,061 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015909041.