+11.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
106 of 1,733tied with 41 others
Score vs region
+11.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
15 of 208tied with 9 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,235 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
119 of 1,235tied with 36 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.8 average for 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
58%vs 52.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Masters
28%vs 22.6% avg · +5.4 pts
Among 1,671 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Silverton School is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 106th of 1,733 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 41 others).
Silverton School is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 15th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 9 others).
Silverton School is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 119th of 1,235 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 36 others).
Silverton School is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
School Progress93 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,665 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+14.0 vs similar economic context · 1,650 reporting
Academic Growth72 C−3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.7 vs similar economic context · 1,665 reporting
Silverton School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,733 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
72
C
8
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
Meets grade level58%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,671 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
Meets grade level65%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
Masters grade level27%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,669 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
Meets grade level48%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
Masters grade level28%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
Meets grade level69%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
Masters grade level36%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,543 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Meets grade level46%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Masters grade level15%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,733 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
90.9%−2.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 447 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
88.1%
+11.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 474 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
20.0%
59.0%
−39.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
20.0%
29.4%
−9.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
10.5%
−10.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
90.0%
33.8%
+56.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
70.0%
38.3%
+31.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.8%
−4.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.6%
−4.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.1%
−3.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
10.0%
7.5%
+2.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
3.5%
−3.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 476 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
195
Economically disadvantaged
51.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.5%−11.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.9%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Silverton School
Hispanic 38.1%
White 59.3%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting for every category shown · 1,733 in full cohort
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 41.9%
White 40.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
African American 7.9%
Hispanic 46.8%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
194
Economically disadvantaged students
100
Emergent bilingual students
3
Special education students
25
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
13
Students in TEA mobility denominator
182
TEA-published mobility rate
7.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 195 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 9 (4.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
195
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−9
Decrease · −4.4%
Change since 2021–22
+8
Increase · +4.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
195
Selected comparison
646.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Silverton School
School year
Students enrolledSilverton School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
187
First available year
649
2022–23
213
Increase of 26 (13.9%)
654.1
2023–24
223
Increase of 10 (4.7%)
654.4
2024–25
204
Decrease of 19 (8.5%)
650.1
2025–26
195
Decrease of 9 (4.4%)
646.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
10
4.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
10
4.81 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
208
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.8%
Selected comparison
12.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,345 rated schools reporting
−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.81
Selected comparison
27.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,446 rated schools reporting
−22.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Silverton School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
200
17
8.5%
21
10.50
9.7%
18.8
2021–22
203
16
7.9%
25
12.32
12.1%
27
2022–23
226
19
8.4%
31
13.72
12.7%
29
2023–24
226
16
7.1%
26
11.50
12.6%
29.2
2024–25
208
10
4.8%
10
4.81
12.3%
27.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Silverton School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
10
4.8%
10
4.81
12.3%
27.5
In-school suspensions
10
4.8%
10
4.81
11.0%
21.2
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Silverton School
Parent district: Silverton ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,175
Selected comparison
$12,178
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting
+$997 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,175 per student for this campus, $20,113 per student for its parent district, Silverton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Silverton School
Parent district: Silverton ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,188
$34,354
$13,054
$7,852
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,584 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,697
$29,917
$13,108
$8,040
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,600 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,653
$36,185
$14,058
$8,570
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,614
$33,967
$14,797
$8,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2022
$14,318
$21,153
$15,708
$10,274
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 rated schools reporting
2023
$13,088
$19,339
$16,792
$10,748
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,660 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,929
$18,686
$18,125
$11,655
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,175
$20,113
$18,972
$12,178
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$60,891−$5,915 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−22.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.8−9.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Silverton School
1 to 5 years 18.7%
6 to 10 years 22.2%
11 to 20 years 44.9%
21 to 30 years 4.5%
Over 30 years 9.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting for every category shown · 1,733 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29.2%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Silverton School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSilverton School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
15
18
Grade 1
15
18.3
Grade 2
16
18.5
Grade 3
19
18.9
Grade 4
17.5
19
Grade 5
10
19.9
Grade 6
11.5
17.7
Secondary English
10.9
15
Secondary languages other than English
18
17.5
Secondary math
13
15.9
Secondary science
13.1
17.4
Secondary social studies
11.5
17.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 65
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 65 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
7of 196
Relative Performance
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 196
School Progress
Region 16: Amarillo · of the 196 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
86of 1,671
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,671 that report this measure · tied with 30
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 023902001.