Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Sherman Inspire Academy

Inspire Academies · Sherman · 428 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
48/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−35.0 ptsvs 83 average · 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
64 of 64among reporting charter campuses
F48

At a glance

The current score is below the 83 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Sherman Inspire Academy is rated F by TEA, scoring 48 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83 average for 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 64th of 64 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 1 year of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
18.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 rated charter campuses reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 48 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26F4883.0 64 reporting81.7 829 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement55 F−28.3 vs similar economic context · 64 reporting
  • School Progress50 F−28.8 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps30 F−50.1 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
  • Academic Growth49 F−24.6 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Relative Performance50 F−26.3 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
  • Sherman Inspire Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement55F5
School Progress50F10
Closing the Gaps30F30
Academic Growth49F11
Relative Performance50F10

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 5 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (55), so School Progress (50) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 55.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level55%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 63 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level45%−37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Meets grade level24%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level59%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (64 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
428
Economically disadvantaged
34.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.8%+11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Sherman Inspire Academy

African American: 11.9%Hispanic: 18.9%White: 57.7%American Indian: 1.9%Asian: 2.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 6.5%
  • African American 11.9%
  • Hispanic 18.9%
  • White 57.7%
  • American Indian 1.9%
  • Asian 2.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 6.5%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 36.4%White: 39.1%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 7.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.9%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 36.4%
  • White 39.1%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 7.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
428
Economically disadvantaged students
149
Emergent bilingual students
14
Special education students
106

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$64,953+$5,221 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−16.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
25.2+5.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Sherman Inspire Academy

1 to 5 years: 47.1%6 to 10 years: 41.2%11 to 20 years: 5.9%21 to 30 years: 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 41.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 5.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.2%1 to 5 years: 41.1%6 to 10 years: 21%11 to 20 years: 17.2%21 to 30 years: 6.7%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 41.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 21%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.7%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015808020.