txschools.net
Menu

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Campus · Traditional

Shady Grove Elem

Burnet County · Region 13: Austin · 558 students

Learn more & enroll

D66

Shady Grove Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.2 average of the 1,830 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 8 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 72.

Ranks 7,013th of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 80 others), and 449th of 519 in Region 13: Austin (tied with 6 others).

2 consecutive years rated unacceptable.

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this school's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Spending per student
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
9080706050 Schools like this oneTexas averageShady Grove Elem 7467696266 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26D6681.281.3
2024-25D6281.381.2
2023-24D6979.278.9
2022-23D6779.979.1
2021-22C7482.883.7

How this school's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Shady Grove Elem itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.

Texas schools

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar 80.4 · region 77.6
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar 81.3 · region 78.8
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar 78.4 · region 77.2
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar 74.8 · region 76
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar 79.4 · region 71.9
  • Shady Grove Elem
  • Similar student population (1,830)
  • Region 13: Austin (519)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
558
Economically disadvantaged
55.4%−0.4 pts vs similar
English learners
14.7%+0.3 pts vs similar
Special education
13.3%−5.5 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.0%+0.6 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
8.9%−6.3 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 0.5%Hispanic: 35.1%White: 59.9%American Indian: 0.9%Asian: 0.7%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 0.5%
  • Hispanic 35.1%
  • White 59.9%
  • American Indian 0.9%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$11k$16k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Shady Grove Elem
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.

Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.

Teachers

Average salary
$65,337−$1,222 vs similar
Teachers
36
Students per staff member
15.5

Teaching experience

Beginning: 5.5%1 to 5 years: 13.9%6 to 10 years: 24.9%11 to 20 years: 34.1%21 to 30 years: 21.3%
  • Beginning 5.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.3%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 20 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 1of 13

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Burnet County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 13

    Average teacher salary

    Burnet County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Attendance

    Burnet County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 13

    Overall score

    Burnet County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 13

    Per-student spending

    Burnet County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 5

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 027903101.