Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Shady Brook Elem

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 575 students

Current score
79/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,115 of 2,002tied with 76 others
C79

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 48.4% avg · +2.6 pts
Masters
24%vs 19.7% avg · +4.3 pts

Among 1,900 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 42.6% avg · +7.4 pts
Masters
21%vs 16.4% avg · +4.6 pts

Among 1,888 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
55%vs 53.1% avg · +1.9 pts
Masters
29%vs 21.3% avg · +7.7 pts

Among 1,896 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Shady Brook Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 79 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,115th of 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 76 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
27.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageShady Brook Elem 8787748179 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7980.0 2,002 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8179.8 1,977 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7477.9 1,957 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8778.4 1,924 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8782.2 1,900 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−1.0 vs similar economic context · 1,900 reporting
  • School Progress81 B+0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps75 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,836 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
  • Shady Brook Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps75C5
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level74%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,738 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
575
Economically disadvantaged
63.6%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
26.7%+9.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.4%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.0%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Shady Brook Elem

African American: 22%Hispanic: 26.4%White: 26.9%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 12.5%Pacific Islander: 2.1%Two or More Races: 10%
  • African American 22%
  • Hispanic 26.4%
  • White 26.9%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 12.5%
  • Pacific Islander 2.1%
  • Two or More Races 10%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

African American: 10.9%Hispanic: 50.9%White: 31.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 10.9%
  • Hispanic 50.9%
  • White 31.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
569
Economically disadvantaged students
362
Emergent bilingual students
152
Special education students
116

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
104
Students in TEA mobility denominator
534
TEA-published mobility rate
19.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 575 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (1.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
575

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−7

Decrease · −1.2%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
575
Selected comparison
620.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Shady Brook Elem
School yearStudents enrolledShady Brook ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 576 First available year 635
2022–23 551 Decrease of 25 (4.3%) 641.4
2023–24 568 Increase of 17 (3.1%) 638
2024–25 582 Increase of 14 (2.5%) 633
2025–26 575 Decrease of 7 (1.2%) 620.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
38

5.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
57

8.66 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
658

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.8%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 rated schools reporting

−7.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.66
Selected comparison
29.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,655 rated schools reporting

−21.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Shady Brook Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 626 29 4.6% 59 9.42 9.8% 19.4
2021–22 628 44 7.0% 97 15.45 12.7% 29.5
2022–23 597 34 5.7% 68 11.39 13.3% 31.7
2023–24 644 31 4.8% 55 8.54 13.1% 31.4
2024–25 658 38 5.8% 57 8.66 12.9% 29.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Shady Brook Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 38 5.8% 57 8.66 12.9% 29.9
In-school suspensions 38 5.8% 54 8.21 11.5% 22.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Shady Brook Elem
  • Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,257
Selected comparison
$12,662

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

−$3,405 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,257 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearShady Brook ElemParent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,259$10,047$13,054$7,925 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,829 rated schools reporting
2019$7,565$11,598$13,108$8,076 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,844 rated schools reporting
2020$8,429$15,516$14,058$8,659 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,867 rated schools reporting
2021$8,408$12,690$14,797$9,101 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,880 rated schools reporting
2022$8,002$12,184$15,708$10,421 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 rated schools reporting
2023$8,970$14,299$16,792$11,138 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2024$9,194$15,258$18,125$12,073 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,953 rated schools reporting
2025$9,257$17,072$18,972$12,662 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,973 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$73,248+$6,853 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−5.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+1.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Shady Brook Elem

1 to 5 years: 31.3%6 to 10 years: 13.7%11 to 20 years: 33%21 to 30 years: 19.2%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 33%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.2%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 26.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Shady Brook Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classShady Brook Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten2118
Grade 12218.2
Grade 217.218.4
Grade 323.118.6
Grade 42319
Grade 521.519.8
Grade 626.517.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916117.