+10.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 1,979 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
197 of 1,979tied with 90 others
Score vs region
+8.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls
Region 09: Wichita Falls placement
17 of 94tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+2.7 ptsvs 88.3 average · 3 rated schools in Baylor County
Score vs similar-size group
+10.2 ptsvs 80.8 average · 2,057 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
310 of 2,057tied with 90 others
Score vs state
+9.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,157 of 7,646tied with 413 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.4 average for 1,979 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 3 rated schools in Baylor County.The current score is above the 80.8 average for 2,057 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
73%vs 49% avg · +24 pts
Masters
41%vs 20.1% avg · +20.9 pts
Among 1,888 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Seymour Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 1,979 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 197th of 1,979 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 90 others).
Seymour Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 94 rated schools in Region 09: Wichita Falls (tied with 3 others).
Seymour Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 3 rated schools in Baylor County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Seymour Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.8 average for 2,057 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 310th of 2,057 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 90 others).
Seymour Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+13.4 vs similar economic context · 1,888 reporting
School Progress92 A+10.8 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
Closing the Gaps87 B+9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,863 reporting
Academic Growth89 B+14.8 vs similar economic context · 1,825 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,881 reporting
Seymour Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,979 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
87
B
3
Academic Growth
89
B
1
Relative Performance
92
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Meets grade level73%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Masters grade level41%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,888 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Meets grade level71%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Masters grade level35%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Meets grade level74%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Masters grade level47%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,877 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,979 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
260
Economically disadvantaged
62.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.1%−13.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
32.9%+14.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.3%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
14.6%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Seymour Elem
African American 2.7%
Hispanic 23.6%
White 64.3%
Asian 1.2%
Two or More Races 8.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting for every category shown · 1,979 in full cohort
African American 10.7%
Hispanic 49.6%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 29%
White 58.7%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Baylor County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
African American 2.2%
Hispanic 22.8%
White 65.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 0.8%
Two or More Races 8.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,057 reporting for every category shown · 2,057 in full cohort
African American 10.1%
Hispanic 51.1%
White 33.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
258
Economically disadvantaged students
160
Emergent bilingual students
8
Special education students
85
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
15
Students in TEA mobility denominator
192
TEA-published mobility rate
7.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 260 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (4.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
260
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+11
Increase · +4.4%
Change since 2021–22
−12
Decrease · −4.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
260
Selected comparison
623.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Seymour Elem
School year
Students enrolledSeymour Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
272
First available year
635.6
2022–23
277
Increase of 5 (1.8%)
640.2
2023–24
267
Decrease of 10 (3.6%)
637.1
2024–25
249
Decrease of 18 (6.7%)
634
2025–26
260
Increase of 11 (4.4%)
623.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
21
7.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
34
12.83 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
265
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.9%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,507 rated schools reporting
−5.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.83
Selected comparison
29.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,632 rated schools reporting
−16.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Seymour Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
284
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
292
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
296
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
299
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
265
21
7.9%
34
12.83
12.9%
29.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Seymour Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
21
7.9%
34
12.83
12.9%
29.5
In-school suspensions
20
7.5%
29
10.94
11.6%
22.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Seymour Elem
Parent district: Seymour ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,124
Selected comparison
$12,496
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 rated schools reporting
−$1,372 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,124 per student for this campus, $20,184 per student for its parent district, Seymour ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Seymour Elem
Parent district: Seymour ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,298
$22,555
$13,054
$7,919
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,961
$12,864
$13,108
$8,067
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,823 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,728
$13,466
$14,058
$8,673
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,200
$14,062
$14,797
$9,103
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,858 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,214
$14,932
$15,708
$10,447
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,860
$16,736
$16,792
$11,125
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,173
$18,791
$18,125
$11,950
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,930 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,124
$20,184
$18,972
$12,496
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,950 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$59,243−$7,102 vs similar economic context
Teachers
19−23.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.7−5.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Seymour Elem
Beginning 10.1%
1 to 5 years 5.3%
6 to 10 years 30.9%
11 to 20 years 30.9%
21 to 30 years 18.1%
Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 reporting for every category shown · 1,979 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 09: Wichita Falls · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 21.6%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 20%
Over 30 years 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Baylor County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 21.2%
6 to 10 years 22.1%
11 to 20 years 22.6%
21 to 30 years 24.1%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,057 reporting for every category shown · 2,057 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 18.1%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 4.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Seymour Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSeymour Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
13.5
18
Grade 1
17.6
18.2
Grade 2
15.5
18.4
Grade 3
15.2
18.6
Grade 4
15.5
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
3of 88
All Subjects — Masters
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
3of 88
Math — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 88
Math — Masters
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
4of 88
Academic Growth
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 88
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 88
Math — Meets
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
5of 88
All Subjects — Meets
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 88
Reading — Approaches
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 88
Relative Performance
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
9of 88
School Progress
Region 09: Wichita Falls · of the 88 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 012901101.