Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

San Vicente Elem

Brewster County · Region 18: Midland · 14 students

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−4.8 ptsvs 90.8 average · 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
590 of 671tied with 22 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 90.8 average for 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

San Vicente Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 90.8 average for 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 590th of 671 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 22 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers and actual class size
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageSan Vicente Elem 94938986 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8690.8 671 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8991.1 663 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—90.1 648 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9390.5 632 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9491.2 620 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B−5.8 vs similar economic context · 659 reporting
  • School Progress64 D−23.1 vs similar economic context · 657 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 88.3 · 655 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 85.2 · 654 reporting
  • Relative Performance64 D−14.8 vs similar economic context · 657 reporting
  • San Vicente Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (671 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress64D6
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance64D6

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so School Progress (64) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level86%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 659 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 657 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 88.6% · 617 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 68.2% · 617 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 41.9% · 617 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 88.6% · 250 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 70% · 250 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 44.7% · 250 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (671 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
14
Economically disadvantaged
14.3%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−10.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
0.0%−16.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.8%−4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
28.6%+21.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

San Vicente Elem

Hispanic: 35.7%White: 35.7%Two or More Races: 28.6%
  • Hispanic 35.7%
  • White 35.7%
  • Two or More Races 28.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 671 reporting for every category shown · 671 in full cohort

African American: 6.4%Hispanic: 20.7%White: 48.1%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 18.8%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 6.4%
  • Hispanic 20.7%
  • White 48.1%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 18.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
14
Economically disadvantaged students
2
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
0

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
0
Students in TEA mobility denominator
7
TEA-published mobility rate
0%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
Suppressed

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for San Vicente Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 Suppressed Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 10 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 13 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 Suppressed Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 Suppressed Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for San Vicente Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$148k$289k20182020202220242025
  • San Vicente Elem
  • Parent district: San Vicente ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$141,287
Selected comparison
$10,897

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 rated schools reporting

+$130,390 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $141,287 per student for this campus, $247,699 per student for its parent district, San Vicente ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSan Vicente ElemParent district: San Vicente ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$56,663$76,507$13,054$7,315 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 574 rated schools reporting
2019$53,228$73,012$13,108$7,413 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 590 rated schools reporting
2020$56,404$74,435$14,058$7,729 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 604 rated schools reporting
2021$126,757$186,751$14,797$8,309 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 612 rated schools reporting
2022$91,522$146,351$15,708$9,521 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 621 rated schools reporting
2023$155,529$218,364$16,792$9,719 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 rated schools reporting
2024$150,086$275,053$18,125$10,775 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 649 rated schools reporting
2025$141,287$247,699$18,972$10,897 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 663 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,291−$7,952 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−50.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
2.8−12.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

San Vicente Elem

Beginning: 40%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 40%
  • Beginning 40%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 40%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 671 reporting for every category shown · 671 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for San Vicente Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSan Vicente Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 1119.1
Grade 4220.4
Grade 5222.2
Grade 6219.4
Secondary English118.4
Secondary languages other than English120.8
Secondary math118.5
Secondary science121.1
Secondary social studies121.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 9 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 59 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 663

    Per-student spending

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 663 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 18

    Reading — Masters

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

8 measures

  • 4of 18

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 5of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 5of 18

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 18

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 8of 18

    Attendance

    Similar size · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 20

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 22

    Overall score

    Similar size · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 022903101.