Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

San Saba HS

San Saba County · Region 15: San Angelo · 197 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
+7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.2 ptsvs 78.8 average · 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
888 of 2,073tied with 73 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.8 average for 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 13 points

68 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 2.2 points above the 78.8 average among 2,073 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 31 points

56 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 14.1 points above the 72.9 average among 1,873 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

87 +7.1 pts vs 79.9

  • 87 is 7.1 points above the 79.9 average among 1,933 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

San Saba HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.8 average for 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 7 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 888th of 2,073 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. After high school: the following fall
  7. Who this school serves
  8. Student counts behind the percentages
  9. Enrollment over time
  10. Discipline and removal from class
  11. Spending per student
  12. Teachers and actual class size
  13. Where this school ranks best
  14. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Progress

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 2 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
31.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
4.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageSan Saba HS 7476826881 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8178.8 2,073 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6878.4 2,056 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8276.3 2,043 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7676.8 2,018 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7481.8 2,002 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,939 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps67 D−9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,918 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,873 reporting
  • Relative Performance76 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,933 reporting
  • San Saba HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,073 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps67D3
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance76C4

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,939 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
  • Meets grade level64%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,788 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level95%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 886 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 886 reporting
  • Masters grade level29%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 886 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,073 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
98.1%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.4%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 417 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
47.0%−39.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria47.0%86.5%−39.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 456 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course18.2%59.5%−41.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA16.4%26.4%−10.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)5.5%11.4%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course27.3%32.7%−5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification1.8%36.8%−35.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.7%−7.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness10.9%3.2%+7.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student16.4%8.1%+8.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.0%−3.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
34

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
14

41.2% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
19

55.9% of graduates

Not trackable
1

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
34
Selected comparison
247.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
14
Selected comparison
105.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
41.2%
Selected comparison
42.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting

−1.6 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
55.9%
Selected comparison
51.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting

+4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.9%
Selected comparison
5.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting

−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
197
Economically disadvantaged
73.1%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
20.3%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.2%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
24.0%+5.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

San Saba HS

Hispanic: 64%White: 34.5%Two or More Races: 1.5%
  • Hispanic 64%
  • White 34.5%
  • Two or More Races 1.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 reporting for every category shown · 2,073 in full cohort

African American: 12.6%Hispanic: 60.1%White: 21.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.2%
  • African American 12.6%
  • Hispanic 60.1%
  • White 21.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
197
Economically disadvantaged students
144
Emergent bilingual students
40
Special education students
28

Early college pathways

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
122

TEA-published share: 61.9%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
233
TEA-published mobility rate
10.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 197 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 20 (9.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
197

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−20

Decrease · −9.2%

Change since 2021–22
−14

Decrease · −6.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
197
Selected comparison
636.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,041 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for San Saba HS
School yearStudents enrolledSan Saba HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 211 First available year 652.8
2022–23 180 Decrease of 31 (14.7%) 657.6
2023–24 213 Increase of 33 (18.3%) 655.9
2024–25 217 Increase of 4 (1.9%) 652.7
2025–26 197 Decrease of 20 (9.2%) 636.5

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
27

11.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
43

18.45 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
233

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.6%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting

−1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
18.45
Selected comparison
31.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,681 rated schools reporting

−13.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for San Saba HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 206 Suppressed — 10 4.85 — 18.6
2021–22 213 12 5.6% 22 10.33 13.0% 31.1
2022–23 190 29 15.3% 71 37.37 13.6% 33.4
2023–24 225 32 14.2% 53 23.56 13.5% 33.1
2024–25 233 27 11.6% 43 18.45 13.3% 31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for San Saba HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 27 11.6% 43 18.45 13.3% 31.9
In-school suspensions 23 9.9% 30 12.88 11.8% 23.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — 11 4.72 — 11.7
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$23k20182020202220242025
  • San Saba HS
  • Parent district: San Saba ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,139
Selected comparison
$13,188

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting

−$1,049 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,139 per student for this campus, $14,783 per student for its parent district, San Saba ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSan Saba HSParent district: San Saba ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,770$11,654$13,054$8,058 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 rated schools reporting
2019$10,382$11,896$13,108$8,206 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,946 rated schools reporting
2020$11,898$12,356$14,058$8,756 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting
2021$15,802$15,527$14,797$9,305 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting
2022$14,012$15,371$15,708$10,594 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
2023$18,243$22,104$16,792$11,230 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 rated schools reporting
2024$13,255$14,810$18,125$12,368 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,042 rated schools reporting
2025$12,139$14,783$18,972$13,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,055 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,221+$2,640 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−22.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
9.4−4.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

San Saba HS

Beginning: 8.6%1 to 5 years: 7.7%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 34.4%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 14.8%
  • Beginning 8.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 7.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 34.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 14.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,073 reporting for every category shown · 2,073 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 27.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for San Saba HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSan Saba HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English10.915.3
Secondary languages other than English1018
Secondary math14.716.2
Secondary science13.417.5
Secondary social studies16.317.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 4of 47

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 8of 111

    Science — Approaches

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 111 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 47

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 66of 1,928

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,928 that report this measure · tied with 18

  • 90of 1,939

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,939 that report this measure · tied with 11

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 206901001.