Recent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
59 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 8.5 points above the 77.5 average among 2,242 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
San Perlita MS
Willacy County · Region 01: Edinburg · 34 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 86/1002025-26
- Change
- +1 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +8.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,242 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 452 of 2,242tied with 85 others
- Score vs region
- +0.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
- Region 01: Edinburg placement
- 276 of 505tied with 34 others
- Score vs county
- −1.4 ptsvs 87.4 average · 13 rated schools in Willacy County
- Willacy County placement
- 8 of 13tied with 1 other
- Score vs similar-size group
- +2.0 ptsvs 84 average · 67 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 29 of 67tied with 3 others
- Score vs state
- +4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,242 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is below the 87.4 average for 13 rated schools in Willacy County.The current score is above the 84 average for 67 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 33 points
55 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 13.4 points above the 74.6 average among 2,050 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 50%vs 36.2% avg · +13.8 pts
- Masters
- 17%vs 14.7% avg · +2.3 pts
Among 1,913 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
59 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 33 points
55 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 4.8 points above the 83.2 average among 487 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Region 01: Edinburg average
80 +2.3 pts vs 77.7
- 80 is 2.3 points above the 77.7 average among 485 schools in Region 01: Edinburg reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
59 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 33 points
55 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Chronically absent
15.6% 2nd-lowest of 13 schools in Willacy County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
59 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 2 points above the 84 average among 67 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 33 points
55 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 2nd of 19 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 27 points
59 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 86 is 4.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 33 points
55 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 88 is 9.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas average
85 +3.8 pts vs 81.2
- 85 is 3.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
San Perlita MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,242 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 452nd of 2,242 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 85 others).
San Perlita MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 276th of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 34 others).
San Perlita MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 87.4 average for 13 rated schools in Willacy County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 8th of 13 rated schools in Willacy County (tied with 1 other).
San Perlita MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 67 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 29th of 67 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 3 others).
San Perlita MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,764th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 299 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Progress
Identification reason: CSI Low Performance
TEA track year 2 · Title I campus
2026-27 school year
Public Education Grant transfer eligibility
Students assigned to this campus may request a transfer under the state's PEG program.
A request is not guaranteed. A receiving district may apply its enrollment rules, and transportation is not automatically provided.
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 35.4%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 7.4%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 77.5 2,242 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | F | 59 | 77.1 2,229 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | D | 65 | 74.4 2,212 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | D | 64 | 74.8 2,198 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 85 | 81.6 2,178 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- San Perlita MS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,242 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 75 | C | 5 |
| School Progress | 85 | B | 5 |
| Closing the Gaps | 88 | B | 2 |
| Academic Growth | 80 | B | 10 |
| Relative Performance | 85 | B | 5 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,242 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 34
- Economically disadvantaged
- 82.4%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 11.8%−20.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 23.5%+4.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 91.9%−1.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 15.6%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
San Perlita MS
- Hispanic 91.2%
- White 8.8%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,242 reporting for every category shown · 2,242 in full cohort
- African American 14.2%
- Hispanic 70.2%
- White 11.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- African American 0.2%
- Hispanic 97.5%
- White 1.9%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison average For Willacy County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- African American 0.1%
- Hispanic 95.5%
- White 4.3%
- American Indian 0.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 67 reporting for every category shown · 67 in full cohort
- African American 7.1%
- Hispanic 55.3%
- White 33%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 2.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 34
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 28
- Emergent bilingual students
- 4
- Special education students
- 8
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 7
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 46
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 15.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 34 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 6 (15.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 34
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −6
Decrease · −15.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- −16
Decrease · −32.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 34
- Selected comparison
- 616.7
| School year | Students enrolledSan Perlita MS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 50 | First available year | 647.4 |
| 2022–23 | 43 | Decrease of 7 (14.0%) | 648 |
| 2023–24 | 46 | Increase of 3 (7.0%) | 641 |
| 2024–25 | 40 | Decrease of 6 (13.0%) | 637 |
| 2025–26 | 34 | Decrease of 6 (15.0%) | 616.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 46
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 58 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 52 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 47 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 53 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 46 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- San Perlita MS
- Parent district: San Perlita ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $15,031
- Selected comparison
- $13,275
For 2025, TEA reported $15,031 per student for this campus, $45,573 per student for its parent district, San Perlita ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | San Perlita MS | Parent district: San Perlita ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $9,076 | $17,845 | $13,054 | $8,243 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,113 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $10,728 | $17,181 | $13,108 | $8,339 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,141 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $11,147 | $19,649 | $14,058 | $8,859 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,154 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $13,561 | $25,014 | $14,797 | $9,536 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,162 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $18,166 | $29,600 | $15,708 | $11,000 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,178 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $17,923 | $27,504 | $16,792 | $11,510 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,197 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $14,162 | $32,194 | $18,125 | $12,494 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,211 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $15,031 | $45,573 | $18,972 | $13,275 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $54,455−$12,949 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 6−36.9 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 6.1−8.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
San Perlita MS
- Beginning 21.4%
- 1 to 5 years 58.9%
- 6 to 10 years 1.8%
- 11 to 20 years 17.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,242 reporting for every category shown · 2,242 in full cohort
- Beginning 7%
- 1 to 5 years 27.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.2%
- 11 to 20 years 35%
- 21 to 30 years 22.6%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Willacy County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 28.8%
- 6 to 10 years 16.5%
- 11 to 20 years 24.8%
- 21 to 30 years 15.7%
- Over 30 years 6.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 67 reporting for every category shown · 67 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.7%
- 1 to 5 years 19.5%
- 6 to 10 years 10.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.8%
- Over 30 years 6.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSan Perlita MS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 15.5 | 17.6 |
| Secondary English | 9 | 15.2 |
| Secondary math | 9 | 16.5 |
| Secondary science | 9 | 17.7 |
| Secondary social studies | 9 | 17.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
-
2of 19
Closing the Gaps
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure
-
2of 13
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Science — Approaches
Willacy County · of the 12 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
18 measures
-
4of 13
Reading — Meets
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 26
Science — Masters
Similar size · of the 26 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Math — Meets
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
5of 13
Attendance
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
5of 13
Per-student spending
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
6of 13
Reading — Approaches
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
7of 13
All Subjects — Meets
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
7of 13
Reading — Masters
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
7of 12
Science — Meets
Willacy County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
8of 13
Overall score
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 13
Relative Performance
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
8of 13
All Subjects — Approaches
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
8of 13
Math — Approaches
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 19
Academic Growth
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
9of 13
School Progress
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 13
All Subjects — Masters
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
10of 13
Student Achievement
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 13
Math — Masters
Willacy County · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 245904041.