Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Sam Rayburn Elem

Fannin County · Region 10: Richardson · 262 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
576 of 1,759tied with 82 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.6 average for 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
61%vs 45.8% avg · +15.2 pts
Masters
24%vs 18.4% avg · +5.6 pts

Among 1,683 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

86 +4.4 pts vs 81.6

  • 86 is 4.4 points above the 81.6 average among 1,759 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

87 +8.1 pts vs 78.9

  • 87 is 8.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,671 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Sam Rayburn Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 576th of 1,759 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageSam Rayburn Elem 9183878886 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8681.6 1,759 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8881.7 1,735 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8779.6 1,710 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8380.3 1,683 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9183.1 1,659 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B+2.0 vs similar economic context · 1,693 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
  • Academic Growth86 B+10.7 vs similar economic context · 1,647 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
  • Sam Rayburn Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,759 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth86B4
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
  • Meets grade level61%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,553 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,759 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
262
Economically disadvantaged
52.7%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.0%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.4%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.1%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Sam Rayburn Elem

Hispanic: 10.8%White: 83.8%Two or More Races: 5.4%
  • Hispanic 10.8%
  • White 83.8%
  • Two or More Races 5.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting for every category shown · 1,759 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 42.6%White: 40.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 42.6%
  • White 40.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
260
Economically disadvantaged students
137
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
52

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
219
TEA-published mobility rate
11%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 262 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (0.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
262

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+1

Increase · +0.4%

Change since 2021–22
−23

Decrease · −8.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
262
Selected comparison
640.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,719 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Sam Rayburn Elem
School yearStudents enrolledSam Rayburn ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 285 First available year 642.8
2022–23 281 Decrease of 4 (1.4%) 648.9
2023–24 267 Decrease of 14 (5.0%) 648.3
2024–25 261 Decrease of 6 (2.2%) 645.4
2025–26 262 Increase of 1 (0.4%) 640.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
286

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Sam Rayburn Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 302 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 300 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 305 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 285 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 286 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Sam Rayburn Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$14k$23k20182020202220242025
  • Sam Rayburn Elem
  • Parent district: Sam Rayburn ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$11,928
Selected comparison
$12,181

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 rated schools reporting

−$253 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $11,928 per student for this campus, $19,842 per student for its parent district, Sam Rayburn ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSam Rayburn ElemParent district: Sam Rayburn ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,640$9,934$13,054$7,877 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2019$6,349$13,151$13,108$8,049 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2020$7,408$13,335$14,058$8,593 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2021$8,589$14,367$14,797$8,980 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 rated schools reporting
2022$8,772$17,414$15,708$10,243 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,662 rated schools reporting
2023$9,666$20,500$16,792$10,805 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,683 rated schools reporting
2024$11,011$21,672$18,125$11,718 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,707 rated schools reporting
2025$11,928$19,842$18,972$12,181 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,664+$45 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−17.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.5−9.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Sam Rayburn Elem

1 to 5 years: 10.9%6 to 10 years: 6.1%11 to 20 years: 31.2%21 to 30 years: 39.7%Over 30 years: 12.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 10.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 6.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 39.7%
  • Over 30 years 12.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,759 reporting for every category shown · 1,759 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.5%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.5%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Sam Rayburn Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSam Rayburn Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten10.118
Grade 11118.3
Grade 22018.5
Grade 31518.9
Grade 41419
Grade 513.519.9
Grade 616.317.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

3 measures

  • 1of 20

    Math — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 20

    Attendance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 20

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 20

    Math — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 19

    Academic Growth

    Fannin County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

15 measures

  • 4of 20

    All Subjects — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    Math — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Closing the Gaps

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 21

    Overall score

    Fannin County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    School Progress

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    All Subjects — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Reading — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 8of 18

    Science — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 18

    Science — Masters

    Fannin County · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 9of 20

    Student Achievement

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 9of 20

    Relative Performance

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 21

    Per-student spending

    Fannin County · of the 21 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    Reading — Approaches

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 20

    Reading — Meets

    Fannin County · of the 20 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 074917101.