Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Saltillo School

Hopkins County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 237 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+10.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,901 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
206 of 1,901tied with 85 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,901 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

88 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 91 is 10 points above the 81 average among 1,901 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 5 points

85 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 8.7 points above the 81.3 average among 1,823 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 50.6% avg · +21.4 pts
Masters
32%vs 21.1% avg · +10.9 pts

Among 1,830 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Saltillo School is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,901 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 206th of 1,901 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 85 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageSaltillo School 9087968891 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9181.0 1,901 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8880.9 1,875 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9679.0 1,850 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8779.6 1,820 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9082.6 1,793 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement87 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,830 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+8.7 vs similar economic context · 1,823 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps94 A+15.8 vs similar economic context · 1,806 reporting
  • Academic Growth90 A+15.4 vs similar economic context · 1,772 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,823 reporting
  • Saltillo School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,901 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement87B3
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps94A—
Academic Growth90A—
Relative Performance85B5

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (87) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level91%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,830 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,818 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,901 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
94.1%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 494 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 490 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 490 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 497 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%−14.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria73.0%87.9%−14.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 528 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course13.3%58.7%−45.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA13.3%28.0%−14.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%10.0%−10.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course46.7%34.0%+12.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification26.7%38.0%−11.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.7%−1.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%5.5%−5.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.7%7.7%−1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.5%−3.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 531 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
237
Economically disadvantaged
57.2%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.4%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.2%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
26.6%+11.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Saltillo School

African American: 2.1%Hispanic: 33.5%White: 60.6%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 2.1%
  • Hispanic 33.5%
  • White 60.6%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting for every category shown · 1,901 in full cohort

African American: 10.1%Hispanic: 46%White: 37.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.1%
  • Hispanic 46%
  • White 37.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
236
Economically disadvantaged students
135
Emergent bilingual students
34
Special education students
43

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
230
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 237 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (5.2%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
237

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−13

Decrease · −5.2%

Change since 2021–22
−7

Decrease · −2.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
237
Selected comparison
628.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Saltillo School
School yearStudents enrolledSaltillo SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 244 First available year 634.7
2022–23 248 Increase of 4 (1.6%) 641.1
2023–24 253 Increase of 5 (2.0%) 639.2
2024–25 250 Decrease of 3 (1.2%) 635.4
2025–26 237 Decrease of 13 (5.2%) 628.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
266

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Saltillo School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 281 Suppressed — 10 3.56 — 18.7
2021–22 261 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 264 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 271 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 266 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Saltillo School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$27k20182020202220242025
  • Saltillo School
  • Parent district: Saltillo ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$12,657
Selected comparison
$12,401

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting

+$256 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $12,657 per student for this campus, $25,528 per student for its parent district, Saltillo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearSaltillo SchoolParent district: Saltillo ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,196$16,088$13,054$7,961 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,726 rated schools reporting
2019$9,826$16,247$13,108$8,129 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 rated schools reporting
2020$8,962$14,860$14,058$8,714 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,765 rated schools reporting
2021$10,186$17,401$14,797$9,083 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,777 rated schools reporting
2022$12,194$20,465$15,708$10,514 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,795 rated schools reporting
2023$12,165$20,861$16,792$11,070 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,820 rated schools reporting
2024$12,072$22,995$18,125$11,843 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 rated schools reporting
2025$12,657$25,528$18,972$12,401 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,513−$31 vs similar economic context
Teachers
23−19.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.5−8.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Saltillo School

1 to 5 years: 4.4%6 to 10 years: 17.8%11 to 20 years: 35.6%21 to 30 years: 26.7%Over 30 years: 15.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 4.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 35.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 26.7%
  • Over 30 years 15.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting for every category shown · 1,901 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 25.1%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.6%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Saltillo School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classSaltillo School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1917.9
Grade 12418.2
Grade 22318.4
Grade 31918.7
Grade 41319
Grade 52319.7
Grade 613.117.4
Secondary English18.314.8
Secondary languages other than English17.517.2
Secondary math1715.6
Secondary science2017.1
Secondary social studies15.617

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 181 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

11 measures

  • 1of 13

    School Progress

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 13

    Closing the Gaps

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 13

    Reading — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Reading — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Math — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 13

    Math — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 1of 11

    Academic Growth

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

4 measures

  • 2of 15

    Overall score

    Hopkins County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 2of 11

    Science — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    Student Achievement

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    Science — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 4of 13

    Relative Performance

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 4of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 15

    Per-student spending

    Hopkins County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Science — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 112909001.