Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 10.1 points above the 76.9 average among 1,692 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Saenz Elem
Jim Wells County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 458 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 85/1002025-26
- Change
- −3 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +7.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 493 of 1,827tied with 66 others
- Score vs region
- +4.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
- Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
- 77 of 191tied with 6 others
- Score vs county
- +3.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County
- Jim Wells County placement
- 5 of 15among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +4.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,496 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,589 of 4,496tied with 146 others
- Score vs state
- +3.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 3,064 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B85
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 83 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,496 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 51%vs 40.6% avg · +10.4 pts
- Masters
- 24%vs 16.1% avg · +7.9 pts
Among 1,696 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 50%vs 39.1% avg · +10.9 pts
- Masters
- 20%vs 15.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 1,693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 6.2 points above the 80.8 average among 164 schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Region 02: Corpus Christi averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 51%vs 49.8% avg · +1.2 pts
- Masters
- 24%vs 20.3% avg · +3.7 pts
Among 164 schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Region 02: Corpus Christi averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 50%vs 44.3% avg · +5.7 pts
- Masters
- 20%vs 17.3% avg · +2.7 pts
Among 164 schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
All Subjects — Masters
24% 3rd of 14 schools in Jim Wells County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Math — Meets
50% 3rd of 14 schools in Jim Wells County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 10 points above the 77 average among 4,265 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 51%vs 49.6% avg · +1.4 pts
- Masters
- 24%vs 22.7% avg · +1.3 pts
Among 4,265 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Reading above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 60%vs 54.6% avg · +5.4 pts
- Masters
- 31%vs 25.5% avg · +5.5 pts
Among 4,265 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
85 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 87 is 8.6 points above the 78.4 average among 7,237 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Reading above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 60%vs 55.2% avg · +4.8 pts
- Masters
- 31%vs 24.5% avg · +6.5 pts
Among 7,254 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Texas average
85 +3.7 pts vs 81.3
- 85 is 3.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Saenz Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 493rd of 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Saenz Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 77th of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 6 others).
Saenz Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County.
Saenz Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,496 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,589th of 4,496 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 146 others).
Saenz Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3,064th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 260 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 83 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 85 | 77.7 1,827 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 88 | 77.5 1,810 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | C | 78 | 73.9 1,794 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 74 | 73.3 1,790 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 82.0 1,768 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Saenz Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,827 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 77 | C | 3 |
| School Progress | 87 | B | 3 |
| Closing the Gaps | 79 | C | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 75 | C | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 87 | B | 3 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,827 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 458
- Economically disadvantaged
- 94.9%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.3%−36.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 24.1%+6.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.8%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 17.8%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Saenz Elem
- African American 1.1%
- Hispanic 88.7%
- White 9.5%
- Asian 0.2%
- Two or More Races 0.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting for every category shown · 1,827 in full cohort
- African American 14.9%
- Hispanic 77.3%
- White 4.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
- African American 1.9%
- Hispanic 77.5%
- White 17.9%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison average For Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
- African American 0.3%
- Hispanic 84.2%
- White 14.8%
- Asian 0.2%
- Two or More Races 0.6%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,496 reporting for every category shown · 4,496 in full cohort
- African American 11.9%
- Hispanic 55.2%
- White 25.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 453
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 430
- Emergent bilingual students
- 24
- Special education students
- 109
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 64
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 398
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 16.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 458 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (2.8%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 458
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −13
Decrease · −2.8%
- Change since 2021–22
- −44
Decrease · −8.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 458
- Selected comparison
- 561.8
| School year | Students enrolledSaenz Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 502 | First available year | 609.6 |
| 2022–23 | 533 | Increase of 31 (6.2%) | 605.8 |
| 2023–24 | 528 | Decrease of 5 (0.9%) | 595.6 |
| 2024–25 | 471 | Decrease of 57 (10.8%) | 588.7 |
| 2025–26 | 458 | Decrease of 13 (2.8%) | 561.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 26
5.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 39
8.02 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 486
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 5.3%
- Selected comparison
- 13.1%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 8.02
- Selected comparison
- 30.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 480 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 557 | 26 | 4.7% | 53 | 9.52 | 12.5% | 29.7 |
| 2022–23 | 544 | 33 | 6.1% | 77 | 14.15 | 13.6% | 32.8 |
| 2023–24 | 557 | 21 | 3.8% | 36 | 6.46 | 13.7% | 33 |
| 2024–25 | 486 | 26 | 5.3% | 39 | 8.02 | 13.1% | 30.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 26 | 5.3% | 39 | 8.02 | 13.1% | 30.9 |
| In-school suspensions | 13 | 2.7% | 15 | 3.09 | 11.4% | 21.9 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | 16 | 3.3% | 21 | 4.32 | 5.1% | 6.2 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | 16 | 3.3% | 21 | 4.32 | 3.3% | 4 |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Saenz Elem
- Parent district: Alice ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $10,230
- Selected comparison
- $13,276
For 2025, TEA reported $10,230 per student for this campus, $16,012 per student for its parent district, Alice ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Saenz Elem | Parent district: Alice ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $5,394 | $9,778 | $13,054 | $8,359 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,227 | $11,103 | $13,108 | $8,372 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $7,157 | $12,113 | $14,058 | $8,868 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,668 | $15,453 | $14,797 | $9,712 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,753 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $9,610 | $17,267 | $15,708 | $11,228 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $10,155 | $16,178 | $16,792 | $11,864 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,483 | $14,739 | $18,125 | $12,725 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $10,230 | $16,012 | $18,972 | $13,276 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,505−$981 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 17−22.8 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 27.2+12.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Saenz Elem
- 1 to 5 years 22.2%
- 6 to 10 years 12%
- 11 to 20 years 41.9%
- 21 to 30 years 6%
- Over 30 years 18%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting for every category shown · 1,827 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27%
- 6 to 10 years 18.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 14.9%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
- Beginning 5%
- 1 to 5 years 23.1%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.6%
- 21 to 30 years 17.3%
- Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison average For Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
- Beginning 2.4%
- 1 to 5 years 22.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18%
- 11 to 20 years 29.8%
- 21 to 30 years 18.5%
- Over 30 years 9.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,496 reporting for every category shown · 4,496 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 28.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
- Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classSaenz Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 17.4 | 18.1 |
| Grade 1 | 16.2 | 18.3 |
| Grade 2 | 16.7 | 18.3 |
| Grade 3 | 17 | 18.5 |
| Grade 4 | 17.4 | 18.3 |
| Grade 5 | 17.9 | 19.1 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
-
3of 14
All Subjects — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
3of 14
Math — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
19 measures
-
4of 14
All Subjects — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 14
Reading — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
4of 14
Reading — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
4of 14
Math — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
5of 15
Overall score
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
5of 14
School Progress
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
5of 14
Closing the Gaps
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 14
Academic Growth
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 14
Relative Performance
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
5of 14
Science — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 15
Attendance
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 15
Per-student spending
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
6of 14
Reading — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
6of 14
Science — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
7of 15
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
-
7of 14
All Subjects — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
7of 14
Math — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
8of 14
Student Achievement
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
9of 14
Science — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 125901105.