Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $337
- Selected comparison
- $11,975
Traditional public school campus
S T E P - JJAEP
Williamson County · Region 13: Austin · 2 students
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for S T E P - JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for S T E P - JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for S T E P - JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for S T E P - JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for S T E P - JJAEP for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 82.1 1,710 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 82.3 1,686 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 80.3 1,658 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 81.0 1,637 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 83.6 1,614 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- S T E P - JJAEP
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,710 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 2
- Economically disadvantaged
- 50.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−13.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 50.0%+31.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 89.3%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 54.5%+40.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
S T E P - JJAEP
- Hispanic 50%
- Two or More Races 50%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 reporting for every category shown · 1,710 in full cohort
- African American 9.4%
- Hispanic 40.9%
- White 41.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
- African American 6.8%
- Hispanic 49.9%
- White 31.9%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 6.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison average For Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
- African American 7.1%
- Hispanic 37%
- White 35.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 13.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 2
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 1
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 1
TEA context labels
- Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP)
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 11
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 12
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 91.7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- Not reported
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | 18 | — | 18 | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- S T E P - JJAEP
- Parent district: Georgetown ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
For 2025, TEA reported $337 per student for this campus, $28,096 per student for its parent district, Georgetown ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | S T E P - JJAEP | Parent district: Georgetown ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $16,947 | $18,509 | $13,054 | $7,837 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $2,264 | $16,075 | $13,108 | $8,018 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,576 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $2,040 | $20,856 | $14,058 | $8,523 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $11,426 | $18,293 | $14,797 | $8,936 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,605 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $33,300 | $15,892 | $15,708 | $10,254 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $1,105 | $25,600 | $16,792 | $10,711 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $336 | $27,716 | $18,125 | $11,509 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $337 | $28,096 | $18,972 | $11,975 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $66,153−$753 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 5−37.1 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 0.4−19.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
S T E P - JJAEP
- 1 to 5 years 15.1%
- 6 to 10 years 11.3%
- 11 to 20 years 22.6%
- 21 to 30 years 39.6%
- Over 30 years 9.4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 reporting for every category shown · 1,710 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 29.5%
- 21 to 30 years 16.8%
- Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.9%
- 1 to 5 years 28%
- 6 to 10 years 19.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 14.4%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Williamson County · 164 reporting for every category shown · 164 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.7%
- 11 to 20 years 29.5%
- 21 to 30 years 15%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 246904197.