+2.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,248 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
943 of 2,248tied with 97 others
Score vs region
+1.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
291 of 650tied with 28 others
Score vs county
−1.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 23 rated schools in Maverick County
Maverick County placement
16 of 23among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
−0.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,588 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,410 of 4,588tied with 157 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,248 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 23 rated schools in Maverick County.The current score is level with the 80.1 average for 4,588 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
46%vs 41.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Masters
19%vs 16.2% avg · +2.8 pts
Among 2,079 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Rosita Valley Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,248 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 943rd of 2,248 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 97 others).
Rosita Valley Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 291st of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 28 others).
Rosita Valley Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 23 rated schools in Maverick County. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 16th of 23 rated schools in Maverick County.
Rosita Valley Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.1 average for 4,588 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,410th of 4,588 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 157 others).
Rosita Valley Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement75 C+3.4 vs similar economic context · 2,079 reporting
School Progress83 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 2,071 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−2.5 vs similar economic context · 2,055 reporting
Academic Growth71 C−1.2 vs similar economic context · 2,024 reporting
Relative Performance83 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 2,071 reporting
Rosita Valley Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,248 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
75
C
5
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
71
C
9
Relative Performance
83
B
7
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level76%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 reporting
Meets grade level46%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 reporting
Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,079 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Meets grade level45%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Masters grade level19%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 reporting
Meets grade level52%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 reporting
Masters grade level22%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,067 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level52%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Meets grade level21%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,248 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
471
Economically disadvantaged
82.6%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
43.5%+11.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
12.7%−5.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
21.7%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Rosita Valley Elem
Hispanic 80.5%
White 0.4%
American Indian 16.6%
Asian 1.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,248 reporting for every category shown · 2,248 in full cohort
African American 14.3%
Hispanic 70.4%
White 11%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Maverick County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 97.3%
White 0.9%
American Indian 1.4%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,588 reporting for every category shown · 4,588 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
471
Economically disadvantaged students
389
Emergent bilingual students
205
Special education students
60
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
54
Students in TEA mobility denominator
510
TEA-published mobility rate
10.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 471 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 2 (0.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
471
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−2
Decrease · −0.4%
Change since 2021–22
+78
Increase · +19.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
471
Selected comparison
618.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,219 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Rosita Valley Elem
School year
Students enrolledRosita Valley Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
393
First available year
649.6
2022–23
454
Increase of 61 (15.5%)
650.3
2023–24
474
Increase of 20 (4.4%)
643.2
2024–25
473
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
638.9
2025–26
471
Decrease of 2 (0.4%)
618.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
500
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rosita Valley Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
505
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
456
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
484
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
504
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
500
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rosita Valley Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Rosita Valley Elem
Parent district: Eagle Pass ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,296
Selected comparison
$13,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,232 rated schools reporting
−$3,954 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,296 per student for this campus, $14,008 per student for its parent district, Eagle Pass ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Rosita Valley Elem
Parent district: Eagle Pass ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,032
$10,596
$13,054
$8,243
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,268
$10,878
$13,108
$8,339
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,146 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,485
$11,034
$14,058
$8,855
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,159 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,359
$11,721
$14,797
$9,540
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,167 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,168
$12,928
$15,708
$11,025
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,183 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,992
$13,823
$16,792
$11,514
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,202 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,306
$13,526
$18,125
$12,497
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,296
$14,008
$18,972
$13,250
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,232 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,175+$3,767 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−17.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.2+4.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Rosita Valley Elem
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 12.2%
6 to 10 years 6.9%
11 to 20 years 32.5%
21 to 30 years 28.5%
Over 30 years 12.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,248 reporting for every category shown · 2,248 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Maverick County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
Beginning 2.8%
1 to 5 years 13.8%
6 to 10 years 14.4%
11 to 20 years 37%
21 to 30 years 27.1%
Over 30 years 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,588 reporting for every category shown · 4,588 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rosita Valley Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRosita Valley Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 1
24.3
18.4
Grade 2
25.3
18.4
Grade 3
22
18.9
Grade 4
21.5
18.9
Grade 5
19.6
20
Grade 6
29.3
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
8 measures
5of 19
Math — Masters
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 19
Math — Approaches
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure
6of 19
Math — Meets
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure
8of 20
Attendance
Maverick County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 19
All Subjects — Masters
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 20
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Maverick County · of the 20 that report this measure
10of 19
Student Achievement
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure
10of 19
Relative Performance
Maverick County · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 159901110.