Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 15 points
76 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 91 is 9.3 points above the 81.7 average among 1,290 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Rosedale
Travis County · Region 13: Austin · 189 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Change
- −100 ptssince 2021-22
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-context average
99 +16.5 pts vs 82.5
- 99 is 16.5 points above the 82.5 average among 1,300 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
99 +21.2 pts vs 77.8
- 99 is 21.2 points above the 77.8 average among 1,278 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 15 points
76 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 91 is 13.8 points above the 77.2 average among 499 schools in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Region 13: Austin average
99 +20.2 pts vs 78.8
- 99 is 20.2 points above the 78.8 average among 504 schools in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Region 13: Austin average
99 +23 pts vs 76
- 99 is 23 points above the 76 average among 491 schools in Region 13: Austin reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 15 points
76 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 91 is 14.9 points above the 76.1 average among 192 schools in Travis County reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Travis County average
99 +22 pts vs 77
- 99 is 22 points above the 77 average among 192 schools in Travis County reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Travis County average
99 +24.2 pts vs 74.8
- 99 is 24.2 points above the 74.8 average among 187 schools in Travis County reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 15 points
76 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 91 is 12.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,035 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-size average
99 +17.2 pts vs 81.8
- 99 is 17.2 points above the 81.8 average among 1,037 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-size average
99 +25.1 pts vs 73.9
- 99 is 25.1 points above the 73.9 average among 1,014 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 15 points
76 to 91 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 91 is 12.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas average
99 +17.8 pts vs 81.2
- 99 is 17.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Texas average
99 +23.3 pts vs 75.7
- 99 is 23.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Rosedale for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this school is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- Official improvement and transfer notices
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this comes from
Official improvement and transfer notices
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Comprehensive Support and Improvement
Official support label: Comprehensive Reidentified
Identification reason: CSI Low Graduation Rate
TEA track year 3
Schools identified for improvement
- This school
- Listed
- Selected comparison
- 13.1%
Schools on the PEG list
- This school
- Not listed
- Selected comparison
- 0.4%
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 84.4 1,344 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 84.6 1,314 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 82.9 1,292 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 83.4 1,281 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | A | 100 | 85.3 1,263 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Rosedale
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,344 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 73 | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | 99 | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 91 | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | 99 | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 84 | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (99), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 99.
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,344 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−93.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 50.0%−43.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 83.3%−9.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 2.3%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 72.0%−16.6 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 72.0% | 88.6% | −16.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 0.0% | 60.8% | −60.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 34.5% | −34.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 13.9% | −13.9 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 0.0% | 36.5% | −36.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 0.0% | 37.8% | −37.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.3% | −1.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.2% | −4.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 6.0% | −6.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 71.9% | 2.7% | +69.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 6.3% | 7.3% | −1.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 3.3% | −3.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 189
- Economically disadvantaged
- 39.8%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 19.3%+8.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 93.9%+75.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 92.5%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 22.9%+10.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Rosedale
- African American 16%
- Hispanic 51.4%
- White 24.3%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 5%
- Pacific Islander 0.6%
- Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,344 reporting for every category shown · 1,344 in full cohort
- African American 9.2%
- Hispanic 35.4%
- White 46%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
- African American 6.8%
- Hispanic 49.9%
- White 31.9%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 6.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison average For Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
- African American 9.2%
- Hispanic 55.1%
- White 25.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 5.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,167 reporting for every category shown · 1,167 in full cohort
- African American 7.7%
- Hispanic 46.4%
- White 41.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 181
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 72
- Emergent bilingual students
- 35
- Special education students
- 170
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 15
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 161
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 9.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 189 students in 2025–26, an increase of 10 (5.6%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 189
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +10
Increase · +5.6%
- Change since 2021–22
- +23
Increase · +13.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 189
- Selected comparison
- 699.3
| School year | Students enrolledRosedale | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 166 | First available year | 703 |
| 2022–23 | 147 | Decrease of 19 (11.4%) | 709.9 |
| 2023–24 | 148 | Increase of 1 (0.7%) | 710.1 |
| 2024–25 | 179 | Increase of 31 (20.9%) | 704.8 |
| 2025–26 | 189 | Increase of 10 (5.6%) | 699.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 161
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 135 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 131 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 128 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 136 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 161 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Rosedale
- Parent district: Austin ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $50,949
- Selected comparison
- $12,010
For 2025, TEA reported $50,949 per student for this campus, $26,839 per student for its parent district, Austin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Rosedale | Parent district: Austin ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $43,686 | $13,757 | $13,054 | $7,782 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,205 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $40,491 | $14,067 | $13,108 | $7,977 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,222 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $41,999 | $16,747 | $14,058 | $8,344 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,230 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $44,091 | $18,042 | $14,797 | $8,746 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,248 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $246,704 | $18,220 | $15,708 | $10,097 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,264 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $58,417 | $16,721 | $16,792 | $10,534 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,281 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $47,979 | $19,064 | $18,125 | $11,687 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,293 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $50,949 | $26,839 | $18,972 | $12,010 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,315 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $65,222−$2,184 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 28−19.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 6.6−7.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Rosedale
- Beginning 18.1%
- 1 to 5 years 43.5%
- 6 to 10 years 16.7%
- 11 to 20 years 14.5%
- 21 to 30 years 3.6%
- Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,344 reporting for every category shown · 1,344 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.3%
- 1 to 5 years 23.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 31.1%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison average For Region 13: Austin · 519 reporting for every category shown · 519 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.9%
- 1 to 5 years 28%
- 6 to 10 years 19.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 14.4%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Travis County · 195 reporting for every category shown · 195 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 30.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 26.7%
- 21 to 30 years 13.2%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 1,167 reporting for every category shown · 1,167 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.6%
- 1 to 5 years 23.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classRosedale · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 1 | 19.6 |
| Grade 4 | 1 | 19.3 |
| Grade 5 | 1.4 | 20.8 |
| Grade 6 | 1.3 | 18.1 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227901251.