Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Rosebud-Lott MSB86vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Rosebud-Lott MS
Falls County · Region 12: Waco · 174 students
Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.9 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,887 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
595 of 1,887tied with 73 others
Score vs region
+7.5 ptsvs 78.5 average · 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco
Region 12: Waco placement
77 of 301tied with 8 others
Score vs county
+6.1 ptsvs 79.9 average · 7 rated schools in Falls County
Score vs similar-size group
+4.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,013 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
369 of 1,013tied with 40 others
Score vs state
+4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 78 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.1 average for 1,887 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco.The current score is above the 79.9 average for 7 rated schools in Falls County.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,013 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
53%vs 50.8% avg · +2.2 pts
Masters
27%vs 21.3% avg · +5.7 pts
Among 1,815 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Rosebud-Lott MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.1 average for 1,887 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 595th of 1,887 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).
Rosebud-Lott MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.5 average for 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 77th of 301 rated schools in Region 12: Waco (tied with 8 others).
Rosebud-Lott MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.9 average for 7 rated schools in Falls County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Rosebud-Lott MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,013 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 369th of 1,013 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 40 others).
Rosebud-Lott MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 78 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement84 B+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,815 reporting
School Progress87 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,807 reporting
Closing the Gaps82 B+3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,791 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,758 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,807 reporting
Rosebud-Lott MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,887 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
84
B
6
School Progress
87
B
3
Closing the Gaps
82
B
8
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
87
B
3
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so
Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Meets grade level53%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Meets grade level52%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Masters grade level26%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,812 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Meets grade level61%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Masters grade level29%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 reporting
Meets grade level56%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 reporting
Masters grade level36%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
Meets grade level29%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
Masters grade level13%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 942 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,887 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
174
Economically disadvantaged
56.3%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.5%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.0%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.8%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Rosebud-Lott MS
African American 6.9%
Hispanic 33.9%
White 53.4%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting for every category shown · 1,887 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 45.4%
White 37.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
African American 14.2%
Hispanic 37.4%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.7%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Falls County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
African American 22.2%
Hispanic 35.3%
White 37.7%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,013 reporting for every category shown · 1,013 in full cohort
African American 7.2%
Hispanic 45.4%
White 42.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
174
Economically disadvantaged students
98
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
33
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
177
TEA-published mobility rate
15.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 174 students in 2025–26, an increase of 18 (11.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
174
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+18
Increase · +11.5%
Change since 2021–22
+92
Increase · +112.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
174
Selected comparison
633.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,847 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Rosebud-Lott MS
School year
Students enrolledRosebud-Lott MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
82
First available year
637
2022–23
103
Increase of 21 (25.6%)
643.5
2023–24
109
Increase of 6 (5.8%)
642
2024–25
156
Increase of 47 (43.1%)
638.9
2025–26
174
Increase of 18 (11.5%)
633.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
26
14.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
42
23.73 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
177
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
14.7%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,445 rated schools reporting
+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
23.73
Selected comparison
28
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,566 rated schools reporting
−4.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rosebud-Lott MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
92
18
19.6%
37
40.22
9.7%
18.8
2021–22
87
20
23.0%
39
44.83
12.4%
28
2022–23
114
30
26.3%
62
54.39
12.9%
29.7
2023–24
116
23
19.8%
44
37.93
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
177
26
14.7%
42
23.73
12.5%
28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rosebud-Lott MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
26
14.7%
42
23.73
12.5%
28
In-school suspensions
21
11.9%
30
16.95
11.3%
21.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Rosebud-Lott MS
Parent district: Rosebud-Lott ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,257
Selected comparison
$12,328
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,857 rated schools reporting
−$4,071 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,257 per student for this campus, $27,496 per student for its parent district, Rosebud-Lott ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Rosebud-Lott MS
Parent district: Rosebud-Lott ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,405
$27,277
$13,054
$7,934
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,709 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,497
$18,499
$13,108
$8,103
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,727 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,909
$13,099
$14,058
$8,689
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,904
$14,732
$14,797
$9,066
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,061
$18,972
$15,708
$10,478
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,778 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,450
$17,938
$16,792
$10,982
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,451
$17,546
$18,125
$11,814
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,831 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,257
$27,496
$18,972
$12,328
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,857 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$63,279−$3,249 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−29.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−5.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Rosebud-Lott MS
1 to 5 years 50.8%
6 to 10 years 2.4%
11 to 20 years 42.1%
21 to 30 years 3.2%
Over 30 years 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 reporting for every category shown · 1,887 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 12: Waco · 301 reporting for every category shown · 301 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 26.8%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Falls County · 7 reporting for every category shown · 7 in full cohort
Beginning 12%
1 to 5 years 28.9%
6 to 10 years 13%
11 to 20 years 22%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 6.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,013 reporting for every category shown · 1,013 in full cohort
Beginning 6.8%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 28.2%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rosebud-Lott MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRosebud-Lott MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
19
17.5
Secondary English
20.8
14.9
Secondary math
16.7
15.7
Secondary science
17.1
17.2
Secondary social studies
23
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 073905041.