Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ronald W Reagan MS

Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 840 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−3.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,924 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,203 of 1,924tied with 79 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81 average for 1,924 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

9.6% −6 pts vs 15.6%

  • 9.6% is 6 percentage points lower than the 15.6% average among 1,862 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.7% +1.4 pts vs 94.3%

  • 95.7% is 1.4 percentage points above the 94.3% average among 1,862 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ronald W Reagan MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81 average for 1,924 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,203rd of 1,924 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
23.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRonald W Reagan MS 8179827778 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7881.0 1,924 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7780.9 1,896 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8278.9 1,873 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7979.5 1,841 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8182.7 1,815 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement76 C−3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,849 reporting
  • School Progress79 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps74 C−4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,825 reporting
  • Academic Growth72 C−2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,788 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C−0.5 vs similar economic context · 1,842 reporting
  • Ronald W Reagan MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,924 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement76C4
School Progress79C1
Closing the Gaps74C6
Academic Growth72C8
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (79), so Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level71%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,849 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level77%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,846 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,837 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,924 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
840
Economically disadvantaged
58.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.1%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.6%−6.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ronald W Reagan MS

African American: 28.5%Hispanic: 50.1%White: 11.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 5.8%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 28.5%
  • Hispanic 50.1%
  • White 11.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 5.8%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting for every category shown · 1,924 in full cohort

African American: 10.2%Hispanic: 46.8%White: 36.2%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 10.2%
  • Hispanic 46.8%
  • White 36.2%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
840
Economically disadvantaged students
487
Emergent bilingual students
123
Special education students
169

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
84
Students in TEA mobility denominator
935
TEA-published mobility rate
9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 840 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 45 (5.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
840

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−45

Decrease · −5.1%

Change since 2021–22
−44

Decrease · −5.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
840
Selected comparison
635.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ronald W Reagan MS
School yearStudents enrolledRonald W Reagan MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 884 First available year 640.3
2022–23 922 Increase of 38 (4.3%) 645.5
2023–24 927 Increase of 5 (0.5%) 643.9
2024–25 885 Decrease of 42 (4.5%) 641.3
2025–26 840 Decrease of 45 (5.1%) 635.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
88

9.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
166

17.89 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
928

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
9.5%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,460 rated schools reporting

−3.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.89
Selected comparison
28

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting

−10.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ronald W Reagan MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 874 12 1.4% 12 1.37 9.7% 18.8
2021–22 924 60 6.5% 93 10.06 12.4% 28
2022–23 951 88 9.3% 132 13.88 12.9% 29.9
2023–24 964 69 7.2% 96 9.96 12.8% 29.8
2024–25 928 88 9.5% 166 17.89 12.5% 28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ronald W Reagan MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 88 9.5% 166 17.89 12.5% 28
In-school suspensions 83 8.9% 153 16.49 11.2% 21.7
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements 11 1.2% 12 1.29 4.8% 5.6
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Ronald W Reagan MS
  • Parent district: Grand Prairie ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,475
Selected comparison
$12,366

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting

−$3,891 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,475 per student for this campus, $15,557 per student for its parent district, Grand Prairie ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRonald W Reagan MSParent district: Grand Prairie ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,551$13,845$13,054$7,947 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting
2019$7,353$12,520$13,108$8,114 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,768 rated schools reporting
2020$7,010$12,177$14,058$8,726 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 rated schools reporting
2021$7,422$12,184$14,797$9,079 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,799 rated schools reporting
2022$7,623$14,190$15,708$10,467 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,817 rated schools reporting
2023$7,486$14,914$16,792$10,989 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,841 rated schools reporting
2024$7,750$15,330$18,125$11,766 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,869 rated schools reporting
2025$8,475$15,557$18,972$12,366 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$71,477+$4,970 vs similar economic context
Teachers
56+13.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1−4.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ronald W Reagan MS

Beginning: 5%1 to 5 years: 28.7%6 to 10 years: 18%11 to 20 years: 35%21 to 30 years: 11.7%Over 30 years: 1.8%
  • Beginning 5%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 18%
  • 11 to 20 years 35%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.7%
  • Over 30 years 1.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 reporting for every category shown · 1,924 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 25.2%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.5%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ronald W Reagan MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRonald W Reagan MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 613.117.5
Secondary English12.414.8
Secondary languages other than English26.917.3
Secondary math15.215.7
Secondary science15.917.2
Secondary social studies17.317.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057910050.