Recent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 5.1 points above the 79.9 average among 927 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Rolling Hills Elem
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 636 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 89/1002025-26
- Change
- ±0 ptssince 2023-24
- Score vs similar economic context
- +1.1 ptsvs 87.9 average · 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 487 of 950tied with 58 others
- Score vs region
- +8.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
- Region 11: Fort Worth placement
- 193 of 839tied with 22 others
- Score vs county
- +9.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
- Tarrant County placement
- 108 of 466tied with 6 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +8.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,590 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,031 of 4,590tied with 164 others
- Score vs state
- +7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
The available rating history is flat. The current score is above the 87.9 average for 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,590 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 73%vs 65.7% avg · +7.3 pts
- Masters
- 40%vs 33.9% avg · +6.1 pts
Among 929 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 72%vs 60.1% avg · +11.9 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 28.8% avg · +10.2 pts
Among 926 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 9.9 points above the 75.1 average among 810 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Region 11: Fort Worth averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 73%vs 50.7% avg · +22.3 pts
- Masters
- 40%vs 23% avg · +17 pts
Among 813 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Region 11: Fort Worth averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 72%vs 46% avg · +26 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 19.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Among 810 schools in Region 11: Fort Worth reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 8.3 points above the 76.7 average among 455 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Tarrant County averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 73%vs 48.7% avg · +24.3 pts
- Masters
- 40%vs 22.1% avg · +17.9 pts
Among 457 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Tarrant County averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 72%vs 45.1% avg · +26.9 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 19.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Among 455 schools in Tarrant County reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 7.8 points above the 77.2 average among 4,435 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 73%vs 50.5% avg · +22.5 pts
- Masters
- 40%vs 24% avg · +16 pts
Among 4,435 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 72%vs 47.7% avg · +24.3 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 21.3% avg · +17.7 pts
Among 4,435 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Relative Performance rose 2 points
83 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 6.6 points above the 78.4 average among 7,237 Texas schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 73%vs 50.8% avg · +22.2 pts
- Masters
- 40%vs 22.8% avg · +17.2 pts
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Math above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 72%vs 46.3% avg · +25.7 pts
- Masters
- 39%vs 19.7% avg · +19.3 pts
Among 7,227 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Rolling Hills Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.9 average for 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 487th of 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 58 others).
Rolling Hills Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 193rd of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 22 others).
Rolling Hills Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 108th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 6 others).
Rolling Hills Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,590 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,031st of 4,590 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 164 others).
Rolling Hills Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2023-24.
Ranks 1,913th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 285 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
3 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 89 | 87.9 950 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 91 | 87.8 936 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 89 | 86.5 922 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Rolling Hills Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (950 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | 85 | B | 5 |
| Closing the Gaps | 83 | B | 7 |
| Academic Growth | 85 | B | 5 |
| Relative Performance | 85 | B | 5 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (950 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 636
- Economically disadvantaged
- 27.6%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 10.0%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 16.0%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.3%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 13.3%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Rolling Hills Elem
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 32.5%
- White 54%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.3%
- Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting for every category shown · 950 in full cohort
- African American 8.9%
- Hispanic 28.7%
- White 48.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 8.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- African American 15.4%
- Hispanic 39.6%
- White 34.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison average For Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
- African American 21.3%
- Hispanic 45.2%
- White 22.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,590 reporting for every category shown · 4,590 in full cohort
- African American 12.3%
- Hispanic 54.3%
- White 24.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 630
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 174
- Emergent bilingual students
- 63
- Special education students
- 101
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 66
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 413
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 16%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 636 students in 2025–26, an increase of 109 (20.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 636
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +109
Increase · +20.7%
- Change since 2023–24
- +208
Increase · +48.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 636
- Selected comparison
- 814.8
| School year | Students enrolledRolling Hills Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 428 | First available year | 828.9 |
| 2024–25 | 527 | Increase of 99 (23.1%) | 825.1 |
| 2025–26 | 636 | Increase of 109 (20.7%) | 814.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 576
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | 457 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 576 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Rolling Hills Elem
- Parent district: Fort Worth ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,514
- Selected comparison
- $11,424
For 2025, TEA reported $9,514 per student for this campus, $18,965 per student for its parent district, Fort Worth ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Rolling Hills Elem | Parent district: Fort Worth ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $32,781 | $18,199 | $18,125 | $11,369 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 921 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,514 | $18,965 | $18,972 | $11,424 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $73,537+$5,168 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 39−13.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 16+1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Rolling Hills Elem
- Beginning 20.3%
- 1 to 5 years 7.6%
- 6 to 10 years 23.1%
- 11 to 20 years 33.8%
- 21 to 30 years 15.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting for every category shown · 950 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.8%
- 1 to 5 years 22.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 32.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.4%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 20.6%
- 11 to 20 years 30%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 24%
- 6 to 10 years 20.5%
- 11 to 20 years 29.9%
- 21 to 30 years 16.3%
- Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,590 reporting for every category shown · 4,590 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.8%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.4%
- Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classRolling Hills Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 21.4 | 18.5 |
| Grade 1 | 24.7 | 18.9 |
| Grade 2 | 27 | 19.5 |
| Grade 3 | 19.4 | 20.4 |
| Grade 4 | 23.3 | 20 |
| Grade 5 | 25.3 | 21.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220905256.