+6.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
193 of 1,207tied with 118 others
Score vs region
+11.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
31 of 314tied with 10 others
Score vs county
+6.4 ptsvs 85.6 average · 11 rated schools in Robertson County
Robertson County placement
4 of 11tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,709 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
401 of 4,709tied with 172 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 85.6 average for 11 rated schools in Robertson County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,709 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
77%vs 61.2% avg · +15.8 pts
Masters
39%vs 29.4% avg · +9.6 pts
Among 1,178 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 193rd of 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 118 others).
Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 31st of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 10 others).
Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.6 average for 11 rated schools in Robertson County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 11 rated schools in Robertson County (tied with 2 others).
Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,709 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 401st of 4,709 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 172 others).
Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,178 reporting
School Progress90 A+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,175 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,166 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,156 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,175 reporting
Roland Reynolds Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,207 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
Meets grade level77%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
Masters grade level39%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
Meets grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
Masters grade level32%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
Meets grade level78%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
Masters grade level46%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,207 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
590
Economically disadvantaged
35.3%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.3%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.7%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.3%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Roland Reynolds Elem
African American 5.3%
Hispanic 20.6%
White 68.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.5%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,207 reporting for every category shown · 1,207 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 32.4%
White 47.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Robertson County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
African American 20.1%
Hispanic 30.2%
White 44.4%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,709 reporting for every category shown · 4,709 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.6%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
587
Economically disadvantaged students
207
Emergent bilingual students
31
Special education students
92
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
416
TEA-published mobility rate
5.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 590 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (0.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
590
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+4
Increase · +0.7%
Change since 2021–22
+47
Increase · +8.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
590
Selected comparison
753.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Roland Reynolds Elem
School year
Students enrolledRoland Reynolds Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
543
First available year
764.4
2022–23
534
Decrease of 9 (1.7%)
765.9
2023–24
552
Increase of 18 (3.4%)
765.8
2024–25
586
Increase of 34 (6.2%)
761
2025–26
590
Increase of 4 (0.7%)
753.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
613
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Roland Reynolds Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
516
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
569
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
560
Suppressed
—
11
1.96
—
22.3
2023–24
579
10
1.7%
24
4.15
10.3%
22.5
2024–25
613
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Roland Reynolds Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Roland Reynolds Elem
Parent district: Franklin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,490
Selected comparison
$11,963
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting
−$2,473 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,490 per student for this campus, $22,168 per student for its parent district, Franklin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Roland Reynolds Elem
Parent district: Franklin ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,689
$17,737
$13,054
$7,671
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,079 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,453
$16,004
$13,108
$7,802
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,097 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,950
$16,938
$14,058
$8,136
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,105 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,788
$16,375
$14,797
$8,596
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,119 rated schools reporting
2022
$9,901
$17,765
$15,708
$9,811
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,137 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,542
$21,772
$16,792
$10,483
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,155 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,680
$32,047
$18,125
$11,568
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,167 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,490
$22,168
$18,972
$11,963
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,977−$5,874 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49−0.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Roland Reynolds Elem
Beginning 7.6%
1 to 5 years 16.2%
6 to 10 years 22.4%
11 to 20 years 33.3%
21 to 30 years 18.7%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,207 reporting for every category shown · 1,207 in full cohort
Beginning 5.1%
1 to 5 years 22.8%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Robertson County · 11 reporting for every category shown · 11 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 19.7%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 35.2%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,709 reporting for every category shown · 4,709 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Roland Reynolds Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRoland Reynolds Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.5
18.4
Grade 1
14.9
19
Grade 2
18.2
19.3
Grade 3
17.5
20
Grade 4
14.9
19.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 11
Math — Masters
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 11
Math — Meets
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
3of 11
All Subjects — Meets
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 11
All Subjects — Masters
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 11
Attendance
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
3of 11
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
12 measures
4of 11
Overall score
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 11
Student Achievement
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 11
Academic Growth
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 11
Closing the Gaps
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
5of 11
Relative Performance
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 11
All Subjects — Approaches
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
5of 11
Reading — Approaches
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
6of 11
Reading — Meets
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
6of 11
Reading — Masters
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
6of 11
Math — Approaches
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
7of 11
School Progress
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
8of 11
Per-student spending
Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 198903101.