Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Roland Reynolds Elem

Robertson County · Region 06: Huntsville · 590 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
193 of 1,207tied with 118 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
77%vs 61.2% avg · +15.8 pts
Masters
39%vs 29.4% avg · +9.6 pts

Among 1,178 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
78%vs 55.1% avg · +22.9 pts
Masters
46%vs 24.6% avg · +21.4 pts

Among 1,174 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
75%vs 65.7% avg · +9.3 pts
Masters
32%vs 30.8% avg · +1.2 pts

Among 1,177 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Roland Reynolds Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 193rd of 1,207 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 118 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRoland Reynolds Elem 9291939392 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9285.9 1,207 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9385.8 1,183 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9384.4 1,167 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9184.7 1,154 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9286.4 1,138 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,178 reporting
  • School Progress90 A+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,175 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,166 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 1,156 reporting
  • Relative Performance90 A+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,175 reporting
  • Roland Reynolds Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,207 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress90A—
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance90A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level92%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
  • Masters grade level39%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,178 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
  • Meets grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,174 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,207 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
590
Economically disadvantaged
35.3%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.3%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.7%−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.3%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Roland Reynolds Elem

African American: 5.3%Hispanic: 20.6%White: 68.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 3.6%
  • African American 5.3%
  • Hispanic 20.6%
  • White 68.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,207 reporting for every category shown · 1,207 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 32.4%White: 47.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 32.4%
  • White 47.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
587
Economically disadvantaged students
207
Emergent bilingual students
31
Special education students
92

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
24
Students in TEA mobility denominator
416
TEA-published mobility rate
5.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 590 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (0.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
590

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+4

Increase · +0.7%

Change since 2021–22
+47

Increase · +8.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
590
Selected comparison
753.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Roland Reynolds Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRoland Reynolds ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 543 First available year 764.4
2022–23 534 Decrease of 9 (1.7%) 765.9
2023–24 552 Increase of 18 (3.4%) 765.8
2024–25 586 Increase of 34 (6.2%) 761
2025–26 590 Increase of 4 (0.7%) 753.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
613

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Roland Reynolds Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 516 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 569 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 560 Suppressed — 11 1.96 — 22.3
2023–24 579 10 1.7% 24 4.15 10.3% 22.5
2024–25 613 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Roland Reynolds Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$20k$34k20182020202220242025
  • Roland Reynolds Elem
  • Parent district: Franklin ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,490
Selected comparison
$11,963

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting

−$2,473 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,490 per student for this campus, $22,168 per student for its parent district, Franklin ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRoland Reynolds ElemParent district: Franklin ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,689$17,737$13,054$7,671 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,079 rated schools reporting
2019$7,453$16,004$13,108$7,802 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,097 rated schools reporting
2020$7,950$16,938$14,058$8,136 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,105 rated schools reporting
2021$9,788$16,375$14,797$8,596 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,119 rated schools reporting
2022$9,901$17,765$15,708$9,811 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,137 rated schools reporting
2023$10,542$21,772$16,792$10,483 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,155 rated schools reporting
2024$12,680$32,047$18,125$11,568 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,167 rated schools reporting
2025$9,490$22,168$18,972$11,963 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,183 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,977−$5,874 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49−0.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−2.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Roland Reynolds Elem

Beginning: 7.6%1 to 5 years: 16.2%6 to 10 years: 22.4%11 to 20 years: 33.3%21 to 30 years: 18.7%Over 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 7.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 16.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 18.7%
  • Over 30 years 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,207 reporting for every category shown · 1,207 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Roland Reynolds Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRoland Reynolds Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.518.4
Grade 114.919
Grade 218.219.3
Grade 317.520
Grade 414.919.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 11

    Math — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 11

    Math — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    All Subjects — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    All Subjects — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    Attendance

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 4of 11

    Overall score

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 4of 11

    Student Achievement

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 11

    Academic Growth

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 11

    Closing the Gaps

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 5of 11

    Relative Performance

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 11

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 5of 11

    Reading — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Reading — Meets

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Reading — Masters

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Math — Approaches

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    School Progress

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 11

    Per-student spending

    Robertson County · of the 11 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 198903101.