Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Rockdale JH

Milam County · Region 06: Huntsville · 332 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 2,013 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,190 of 2,013tied with 84 others
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.9 average for 2,013 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 23 points

55 to 78 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 78 is 4.1 points above the 73.9 average among 1,837 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

11.8% −5 pts vs 16.8%

  • 11.8% is 5 percentage points lower than the 16.8% average among 1,949 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Rockdale JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 2,013 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,190th of 2,013 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 84 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Special Education

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
27.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
2.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRockdale JH 7281746778 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7879.9 2,013 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6779.7 1,990 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7477.7 1,974 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8178.3 1,941 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7282.2 1,919 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement72 C−5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
  • School Progress78 C−2.8 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps77 C−0.2 vs similar economic context · 1,877 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,837 reporting
  • Relative Performance74 C−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,896 reporting
  • Rockdale JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,013 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement72C8
School Progress78C2
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance74C6

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (78), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level69%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Meets grade level31%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,741 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,741 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,741 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level44%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level13%−33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,013 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
332
Economically disadvantaged
64.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.5%−7.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.1%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.8%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Rockdale JH

African American: 6.9%Hispanic: 59.6%White: 28.9%American Indian: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 6.9%
  • Hispanic 59.6%
  • White 28.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 reporting for every category shown · 2,013 in full cohort

African American: 11.3%Hispanic: 51.7%White: 30.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.3%
  • Hispanic 51.7%
  • White 30.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
332
Economically disadvantaged students
215
Emergent bilingual students
35
Special education students
50

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
53
Students in TEA mobility denominator
341
TEA-published mobility rate
15.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 332 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (6.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
332

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+19

Increase · +6.1%

Change since 2021–22
−19

Decrease · −5.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
332
Selected comparison
625

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Rockdale JH
School yearStudents enrolledRockdale JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 351 First available year 641.7
2022–23 316 Decrease of 35 (10.0%) 648.1
2023–24 325 Increase of 9 (2.8%) 644.3
2024–25 313 Decrease of 12 (3.7%) 639.6
2025–26 332 Increase of 19 (6.1%) 625

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
95

27.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
237

69.50 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
341

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
27.9%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 rated schools reporting

+15.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
69.5
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,662 rated schools reporting

+39.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Rockdale JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 384 75 19.5% 166 43.23 9.8% 19.4
2021–22 384 140 36.5% 377 98.18 12.9% 30.2
2022–23 342 132 38.6% 344 100.58 13.4% 32.2
2023–24 351 90 25.6% 251 71.51 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 341 95 27.9% 237 69.50 12.9% 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Rockdale JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 95 27.9% 237 69.50 12.9% 30.4
In-school suspensions 87 25.5% 216 63.34 11.6% 23.1
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements 15 4.4% 17 4.99 5.1% 6.1
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$34k$62k20182020202220242025
  • Rockdale JH
  • Parent district: Rockdale ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$58,891
Selected comparison
$12,660

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting

+$46,231 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $58,891 per student for this campus, $31,670 per student for its parent district, Rockdale ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRockdale JHParent district: Rockdale ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,530$13,619$13,054$7,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 rated schools reporting
2019$6,533$16,109$13,108$8,085 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,864 rated schools reporting
2020$7,483$14,056$14,058$8,664 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 rated schools reporting
2021$7,865$14,901$14,797$9,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 rated schools reporting
2022$7,864$16,019$15,708$10,456 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,919 rated schools reporting
2023$9,838$18,114$16,792$11,162 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2024$32,030$26,300$18,125$12,057 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,971 rated schools reporting
2025$58,891$31,670$18,972$12,660 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,987 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,623−$3,789 vs similar economic context
Teachers
26−17.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−1.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Rockdale JH

Beginning: 3.5%1 to 5 years: 28.5%6 to 10 years: 32%11 to 20 years: 16%21 to 30 years: 19.9%
  • Beginning 3.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 32%
  • 11 to 20 years 16%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,013 reporting for every category shown · 2,013 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.3%1 to 5 years: 26.3%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 27.9%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Rockdale JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRockdale JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 615.417.8
Secondary English17.715.1
Secondary languages other than English17.617.5
Secondary math21.915.9
Secondary science18.317.3
Secondary social studies18.217.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 307

    Per-student spending

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 307 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

16 measures

  • 6of 14

    Reading — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 6of 14

    Science — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    Academic Growth

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 16

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Math — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Science — Meets

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 9of 16

    Attendance

    Milam County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 9of 14

    All Subjects — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 9of 14

    Math — Masters

    Milam County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 10

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 9of 10

    Social Studies — Meets

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 9of 10

    Social Studies — Masters

    Milam County · of the 10 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 166904041.