Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Roberto J Santos Elem

Webb County · Region 01: Edinburg · 592 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
−13 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
962 of 2,002tied with 78 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.1 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
51%vs 48.5% avg · +2.5 pts
Masters
24%vs 19.8% avg · +4.2 pts

Among 1,903 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
46%vs 42.7% avg · +3.3 pts
Masters
19%vs 16.4% avg · +2.6 pts

Among 1,891 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
60%vs 53.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Masters
30%vs 21.3% avg · +8.7 pts

Among 1,899 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Roberto J Santos Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 962nd of 2,002 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 78 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRoberto J Santos Elem 9483818581 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8180.1 2,002 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8579.9 1,978 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8177.9 1,959 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8378.4 1,926 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9482.2 1,902 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,903 reporting
  • School Progress81 B±0.0 vs similar economic context · 1,895 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C+4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,840 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 1,895 reporting
  • Roberto J Santos Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress81B9
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level76%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,899 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level65%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,002 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
592
Economically disadvantaged
63.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
39.7%+22.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.7%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.6%−4.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Roberto J Santos Elem

African American: 0.2%Hispanic: 96.6%White: 2.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 0.5%
  • African American 0.2%
  • Hispanic 96.6%
  • White 2.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

African American: 10.9%Hispanic: 50.7%White: 31.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 10.9%
  • Hispanic 50.7%
  • White 31.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
589
Economically disadvantaged students
373
Emergent bilingual students
234
Special education students
122

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
32
Students in TEA mobility denominator
432
TEA-published mobility rate
7.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 592 students in 2025–26, an increase of 8 (1.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
592

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+8

Increase · +1.4%

Change since 2021–22
+246

Increase · +71.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
592
Selected comparison
619.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Roberto J Santos Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRoberto J Santos ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 346 First available year 634.2
2022–23 418 Increase of 72 (20.8%) 640.3
2023–24 564 Increase of 146 (34.9%) 637.1
2024–25 584 Increase of 20 (3.5%) 632.8
2025–26 592 Increase of 8 (1.4%) 619.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
609

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Roberto J Santos Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2021–22 370 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 442 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 603 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 609 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Roberto J Santos Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k202220242025
  • Roberto J Santos Elem
  • Parent district: United ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,269
Selected comparison
$12,648

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting

−$3,379 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,269 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRoberto J Santos ElemParent district: United ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2022$11,849$15,006$15,708$10,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting
2023$9,051$14,779$16,792$11,132 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 rated schools reporting
2024$7,917$15,029$18,125$12,072 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 rated schools reporting
2025$9,269$14,348$18,972$12,648 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,264−$1,173 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38−4.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4+1.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Roberto J Santos Elem

Beginning: 1.3%1 to 5 years: 17.3%6 to 10 years: 20.9%11 to 20 years: 23.6%21 to 30 years: 31.4%Over 30 years: 5.2%
  • Beginning 1.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 17.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 23.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 31.4%
  • Over 30 years 5.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 reporting for every category shown · 2,002 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.1%1 to 5 years: 26.1%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 28.1%21 to 30 years: 16%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 16%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Roberto J Santos Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRoberto J Santos Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.518
Grade 118.118.2
Grade 216.918.4
Grade 318.218.6
Grade 415.919
Grade 520.919.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903136.