Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Robert L Puster Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 506 students

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.7 ptsvs 91.7 average · 391 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
289 of 391tied with 25 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 91.7 average for 391 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
85%vs 76.7% avg · +8.3 pts
Masters
56%vs 47.6% avg · +8.4 pts

Among 384 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
86%vs 73.6% avg · +12.4 pts
Masters
61%vs 43.5% avg · +17.5 pts

Among 382 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

95 +2.2 pts vs 92.8

  • 95 is 2.2 points above the 92.8 average among 384 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Robert L Puster Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 91.7 average for 391 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 289th of 391 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRobert L Puster Elem 9594949590 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9091.7 391 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9592.2 383 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9491.4 372 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9491.8 362 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9592.4 355 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+2.2 vs similar economic context · 384 reporting
  • School Progress83 B−5.1 vs similar economic context · 382 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C−10.5 vs similar economic context · 379 reporting
  • Academic Growth78 C−8.7 vs similar economic context · 379 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 382 reporting
  • Robert L Puster Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (391 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth78C2
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
  • Meets grade level85%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
  • Masters grade level56%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
  • Meets grade level84%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 384 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 reporting
  • Meets grade level86%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 reporting
  • Masters grade level61%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (391 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
506
Economically disadvantaged
5.1%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.5%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.2%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.2%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Robert L Puster Elem

African American: 3.8%Hispanic: 12.5%White: 61.7%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 17%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 3.8%
  • Hispanic 12.5%
  • White 61.7%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 17%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 reporting for every category shown · 391 in full cohort

African American: 4.6%Hispanic: 16.7%White: 48%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 24.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 4.6%
  • Hispanic 16.7%
  • White 48%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 24.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
506
Economically disadvantaged students
26
Emergent bilingual students
23
Special education students
77

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
21
Students in TEA mobility denominator
471
TEA-published mobility rate
4.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 506 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 42 (7.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
506

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−42

Decrease · −7.7%

Change since 2021–22
−158

Decrease · −23.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
506
Selected comparison
860.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Robert L Puster Elem
School yearStudents enrolledRobert L Puster ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 664 First available year 871.5
2022–23 604 Decrease of 60 (9.0%) 893.5
2023–24 551 Decrease of 53 (8.8%) 882.9
2024–25 548 Decrease of 3 (0.5%) 874.6
2025–26 506 Decrease of 42 (7.7%) 860.7

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
564

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Robert L Puster Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 428 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 687 Suppressed — 10 1.46 — 7.5
2022–23 618 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 564 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 564 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Robert L Puster Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Robert L Puster Elem
  • Parent district: Lovejoy ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,261
Selected comparison
$10,957

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

−$2,696 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,261 per student for this campus, $15,916 per student for its parent district, Lovejoy ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRobert L Puster ElemParent district: Lovejoy ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,912$16,320$13,054$7,214 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 322 rated schools reporting
2019$8,488$16,185$13,108$7,371 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 331 rated schools reporting
2020$8,394$14,818$14,058$7,668 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 340 rated schools reporting
2021$8,852$13,942$14,797$8,290 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 349 rated schools reporting
2022$7,627$17,608$15,708$9,579 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 356 rated schools reporting
2023$7,700$15,232$16,792$9,496 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 361 rated schools reporting
2024$8,884$16,626$18,125$10,275 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 rated schools reporting
2025$8,261$15,916$18,972$10,957 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,331−$246 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−20.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−0.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Robert L Puster Elem

1 to 5 years: 40%6 to 10 years: 14.3%11 to 20 years: 20%21 to 30 years: 22.9%Over 30 years: 2.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 40%
  • 6 to 10 years 14.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 20%
  • 21 to 30 years 22.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 reporting for every category shown · 391 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.1%1 to 5 years: 24%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.7%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 24%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Robert L Puster Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRobert L Puster Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.819
Grade 120.319.2
Grade 221.619.6
Grade 322.821.6
Grade 421.820.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 8of 285

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Collin County · of the 285 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

10 measures

  • 12of 292

    Math — Meets

    Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 12of 292

    Math — Masters

    Collin County · of the 292 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 17of 293

    All Subjects — Meets

    Collin County · of the 293 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 42of 1,110

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,110 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 49of 1,107

    Attendance

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,107 that report this measure · tied with 16

  • 58of 1,106

    Math — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 126of 4,506

    Student Achievement

    Similar size · of the 4,506 that report this measure · tied with 61

  • 148of 4,506

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,506 that report this measure · tied with 39

  • 176of 4,506

    Reading — Meets

    Similar size · of the 4,506 that report this measure · tied with 17

  • 195of 4,506

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar size · of the 4,506 that report this measure · tied with 60

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043919104.