Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

River Valley MS

McLennan County · Region 12: Waco · 929 students

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
+1.5 ptsvs 88.5 average · 896 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
414 of 896tied with 77 others
A90

At a glance

The available rating history is moving up. The current score is above the 88.5 average for 896 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 2 points

86 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 3 points above the 85 average among 877 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 67.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Masters
46%vs 35.6% avg · +10.4 pts

Among 879 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 62% avg · +3 pts
Masters
35%vs 30.4% avg · +4.6 pts

Among 877 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

River Valley MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.5 average for 896 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2022-23.

Ranks 414th of 896 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 4 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

4 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRiver Valley MS 88929090 2022-232023-242024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9088.5 896 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9088.5 887 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9287.2 875 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8887.4 859 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+2.7 vs similar economic context · 879 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+3.0 vs similar economic context · 877 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B±0.0 vs similar economic context · 872 reporting
  • Academic Growth87 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 864 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 877 reporting
  • River Valley MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (896 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth87B3
Relative Performance88B2

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level88%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
  • Meets grade level82%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
  • Masters grade level57%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 879 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 877 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 877 reporting
  • Masters grade level35%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 877 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
  • Masters grade level60%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (896 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
929
Economically disadvantaged
25.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.8%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.1%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.4%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

River Valley MS

African American: 6.9%Hispanic: 21.3%White: 63%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.3%
  • African American 6.9%
  • Hispanic 21.3%
  • White 63%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 896 reporting for every category shown · 896 in full cohort

African American: 8.5%Hispanic: 27.6%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 9.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.1%
  • African American 8.5%
  • Hispanic 27.6%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 9.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
929
Economically disadvantaged students
233
Emergent bilingual students
17
Special education students
168

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
61
Students in TEA mobility denominator
933
TEA-published mobility rate
6.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 929 students in 2025–26, an increase of 27 (3.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
929

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+27

Increase · +3.0%

Change since 2022–23
−2

Decrease · −0.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
929
Selected comparison
838.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 892 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for River Valley MS
School yearStudents enrolledRiver Valley MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23 931 First available year 857.6
2023–24 918 Decrease of 13 (1.4%) 852.7
2024–25 902 Decrease of 16 (1.7%) 848.3
2025–26 929 Increase of 27 (3.0%) 838.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
83

8.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
189

20.32 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
930

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.9%
Selected comparison
7.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 651 rated schools reporting

+1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
20.32
Selected comparison
15.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 737 rated schools reporting

+4.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for River Valley MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23 963 105 10.9% 289 30.01 8.4% 16.9
2023–24 973 120 12.3% 376 38.64 8.0% 16.3
2024–25 930 83 8.9% 189 20.32 7.9% 15.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for River Valley MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 83 8.9% 189 20.32 7.9% 15.6
In-school suspensions 73 7.8% 138 14.84 7.1% 12.3
Out-of-school suspensions 19 2.0% 33 3.55 3.9% 5.2
DAEP placements 15 1.6% 16 1.72 2.8% 3.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$8k$14k$20k20232025
  • River Valley MS
  • Parent district: Midway ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,685
Selected comparison
$11,195

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 886 rated schools reporting

−$2,510 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,685 per student for this campus, $13,883 per student for its parent district, Midway ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRiver Valley MSParent district: Midway ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2023$11,505$15,559$16,792$10,053 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 860 rated schools reporting
2024$8,704$14,035$18,125$11,132 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 874 rated schools reporting
2025$8,685$13,883$18,972$11,195 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 886 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$58,513−$10,022 vs similar economic context
Teachers
69+15.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.4−1.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

River Valley MS

Beginning: 3.3%1 to 5 years: 35.2%6 to 10 years: 17.5%11 to 20 years: 31.1%21 to 30 years: 10%Over 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 3.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 35.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 10%
  • Over 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 896 reporting for every category shown · 896 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.8%1 to 5 years: 22.5%6 to 10 years: 19.7%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.1%
  • Beginning 4.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for River Valley MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRiver Valley MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 619.919.2
Secondary English15.717.2
Secondary languages other than English23.919.5
Secondary math1717.8
Secondary science22.419.6
Secondary social studies22.619.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 70

    Science — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

3 measures

  • 3of 283

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 12: Waco · of the 283 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 283

    Reading — Masters

    Region 12: Waco · of the 283 that report this measure

  • 3of 35

    Social Studies — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 35 that report this measure · tied with 2

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

9 measures

  • 4of 75

    Reading — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 4of 70

    Science — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure

  • 5of 75

    Reading — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 75

    Math — Masters

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 75

    All Subjects — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure

  • 7of 72

    Academic Growth

    McLennan County · of the 72 that report this measure

  • 9of 70

    Science — Approaches

    McLennan County · of the 70 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 75

    Student Achievement

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 75

    Math — Meets

    McLennan County · of the 75 that report this measure · tied with 2

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161903042.