Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
River Trails ElemB84vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
River Trails Elem
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 631 students
Current score
84/1002025-26
Change
−9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
716 of 1,815tied with 75 others
Score vs region
+3.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
311 of 839tied with 30 others
Score vs county
+4.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
162 of 466tied with 18 others
Score vs similar-size group
+3.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 4,608 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,842 of 4,608tied with 157 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 4,608 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
59%vs 51.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Masters
34%vs 21.7% avg · +12.3 pts
Among 1,746 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
River Trails Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 716th of 1,815 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 75 others).
River Trails Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 311th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 30 others).
River Trails Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 162nd of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 18 others).
River Trails Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 4,608 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,842nd of 4,608 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 157 others).
River Trails Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 9 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,746 reporting
School Progress86 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,723 reporting
Academic Growth76 C+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,695 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,739 reporting
River Trails Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,815 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
76
C
4
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so
School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level82%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Meets grade level59%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Masters grade level34%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,746 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Meets grade level70%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Masters grade level43%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,744 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Meets grade level52%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Masters grade level27%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
Meets grade level45%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,815 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
631
Economically disadvantaged
54.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
30.2%+15.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.3%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.9%−10.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
River Trails Elem
African American 16.7%
Hispanic 20.8%
White 43.5%
Asian 11.7%
Pacific Islander 1%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting for every category shown · 1,815 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 44.1%
White 38.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,608 reporting for every category shown · 4,608 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 54.4%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
630
Economically disadvantaged students
346
Emergent bilingual students
190
Special education students
115
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
41
Students in TEA mobility denominator
569
TEA-published mobility rate
7.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 631 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 45 (6.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
631
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−45
Decrease · −6.7%
Change since 2021–22
+20
Increase · +3.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
631
Selected comparison
633.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for River Trails Elem
School year
Students enrolledRiver Trails Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
611
First available year
635.4
2022–23
638
Increase of 27 (4.4%)
641.6
2023–24
655
Increase of 17 (2.7%)
641
2024–25
676
Increase of 21 (3.2%)
638.1
2025–26
631
Decrease of 45 (6.7%)
633.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
40
5.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
87
12.46 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
698
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.7%
Selected comparison
12.5%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,398 rated schools reporting
−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
12.46
Selected comparison
28
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,510 rated schools reporting
−15.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for River Trails Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
647
14
2.2%
49
7.57
9.8%
19
2021–22
638
33
5.2%
45
7.05
12.4%
28.1
2022–23
662
25
3.8%
49
7.40
12.9%
29.7
2023–24
690
42
6.1%
78
11.30
12.8%
29.7
2024–25
698
40
5.7%
87
12.46
12.5%
28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for River Trails Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
40
5.7%
87
12.46
12.5%
28
In-school suspensions
40
5.7%
87
12.46
11.2%
21.7
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
River Trails Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,428
Selected comparison
$12,317
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 rated schools reporting
−$4,889 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,428 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
River Trails Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,396
$10,047
$13,054
$7,904
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,295
$11,598
$13,108
$8,078
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,437
$15,516
$14,058
$8,646
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,234
$12,690
$14,797
$9,024
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,695 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,954
$12,184
$15,708
$10,389
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,362
$14,299
$16,792
$10,899
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,572
$15,258
$18,125
$11,780
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,761 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,428
$17,072
$18,972
$12,317
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,787 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,492+$4,932 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−4.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17−2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
River Trails Elem
Beginning 8.1%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 13.5%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 21.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,815 reporting for every category shown · 1,815 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.8%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,608 reporting for every category shown · 4,608 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for River Trails Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classRiver Trails Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20
18
Grade 1
20.8
18.3
Grade 2
24
18.5
Grade 3
24
18.8
Grade 4
23.6
19
Grade 5
23.5
19.8
Grade 6
27
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
11of 457
Attendance
Tarrant County · of the 457 that report this measure
73of 1,759
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,759 that report this measure · tied with 2
76of 1,744
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,744 that report this measure · tied with 17
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916123.