Campus · Traditional
Redwater Int
Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 233 students
Redwater Int is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.1 average of the 1,700 schools serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.3. It is down 10 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 89.
Ranks 4,963rd of 7,646 Texas schools (tied with 264 others), and 97th of 142 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 3 others).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 78 | 82.1 | 81.3 |
| 2024-25 | C | 73 | 82.4 | 81.2 |
| 2023-24 | C | 79 | 80.4 | 78.9 |
| 2022-23 | C | 79 | 81.0 | 79.1 |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 83.6 | 83.7 |
How this school's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Redwater Int itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this school's own row.
Texas schools
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Redwater Int
- Similar student population (1,700)
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant (142)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 80 | B | 10 |
| School Progress | 80 | B | 10 |
| Closing the Gaps | 73 | C | 7 |
| Academic Growth | 69 | D | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 80 | B | 10 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (1,700)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (1,700 schools) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 233
- Economically disadvantaged
- 49.8%−0.5 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 1.3%−11.7 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 18.9%+0.2 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 94.6%±0.0 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 12.9%−1.4 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 2.6%
- Hispanic 4.7%
- White 87.6%
- American Indian 1.3%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Redwater Int
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
TEA's published file does not include peer-group spending for this entity, so no comparison is shown.
Not reported by TEA for this entity: peer.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $61,493−$5,431 vs similar
- Teachers
- 23
- Students per staff member
- 10.3
Teaching experience
- Beginning 4.4%
- 1 to 5 years 17.3%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 36.7%
- 21 to 30 years 23%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 88 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
9of 38
Reading — Masters
Bowie County · of the 38 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this campus ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for districts only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here — 9,086 entities in two formats is 18,172 assets, on top of everything else this site
publishes, and that is past the 20,000-asset limit this site is published under. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 019906102.