Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ranger HS

Eastland County · Region 14: Abilene · 81 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+18 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.7 ptsvs 78.3 average · 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
447 of 2,075tied with 79 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 75 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.3 average for 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 20 points

66 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 7.7 points above the 78.3 average among 2,075 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 24 points

57 to 81 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 81 is 5.4 points above the 75.6 average among 1,907 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
69%vs 40.3% avg · +28.7 pts
Masters
19%vs 17.1% avg · +1.9 pts

Among 1,773 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ranger HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.3 average for 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 18 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 447th of 2,075 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRanger HS 6872586686 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 75 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8678.3 2,075 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6677.8 2,061 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5875.6 2,049 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7276.1 2,027 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6881.7 2,011 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement83 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,928 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+8.5 vs similar economic context · 1,922 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,907 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C+2.4 vs similar economic context · 1,866 reporting
  • Relative Performance88 B+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,922 reporting
  • Ranger HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,075 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement83B7
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance88B2

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level71%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,925 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,773 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 834 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 834 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 834 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,075 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
84.2%−9.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.0%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
77.4%−15.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
1.2%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
94.0%+7.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria94.0%86.1%+7.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course93.8%58.7%+35.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA6.3%25.6%−19.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.9%−11.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course18.8%31.9%−13.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification37.5%37.4%+0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate12.5%2.3%+10.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.5%−7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.0%−5.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.3%8.2%−1.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.0%−3.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
27

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
4

14.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
23

85.2% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
27
Selected comparison
259.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
4
Selected comparison
109.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
14.8%
Selected comparison
41.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated schools reporting

−27.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
85.2%
Selected comparison
52.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated schools reporting

+33.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
6.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 350 rated schools reporting

−6.0 pts vs similar economic context

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
81
Economically disadvantaged
75.3%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−24.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.9%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
88.0%−5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
44.4%+25.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ranger HS

African American: 1.2%Hispanic: 29.6%White: 67.9%American Indian: 1.2%
  • African American 1.2%
  • Hispanic 29.6%
  • White 67.9%
  • American Indian 1.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting for every category shown · 2,075 in full cohort

African American: 13.3%Hispanic: 62.3%White: 19%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.1%
  • African American 13.3%
  • Hispanic 62.3%
  • White 19%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
81
Economically disadvantaged students
61
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
21

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
15
Students in TEA mobility denominator
83
TEA-published mobility rate
18.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 81 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (12.5%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
81

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+9

Increase · +12.5%

Change since 2021–22
−28

Decrease · −25.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
81
Selected comparison
639.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ranger HS
School yearStudents enrolledRanger HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 109 First available year 656.8
2022–23 97 Decrease of 12 (11.0%) 660.7
2023–24 74 Decrease of 23 (23.7%) 658.5
2024–25 72 Decrease of 2 (2.7%) 655.8
2025–26 81 Increase of 9 (12.5%) 639.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
21

25.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
41

49.40 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
83

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
25.3%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,564 rated schools reporting

+12.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
49.4
Selected comparison
31.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 rated schools reporting

+17.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ranger HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 117 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 122 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 113 22 19.5% 79 69.91 13.6% 33.5
2023–24 95 21 22.1% 47 49.47 13.5% 33.2
2024–25 83 21 25.3% 41 49.40 13.2% 31.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ranger HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 21 25.3% 41 49.40 13.2% 31.9
In-school suspensions 16 19.3% 28 33.73 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$23k20182020202220242025
  • Ranger HS
  • Parent district: Ranger ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$21,289
Selected comparison
$13,067

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,059 rated schools reporting

+$8,222 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $21,289 per student for this campus, $19,980 per student for its parent district, Ranger ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRanger HSParent district: Ranger ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$12,586$12,511$13,054$8,056 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,943 rated schools reporting
2019$11,975$11,719$13,108$8,188 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2020$10,769$13,071$14,058$8,742 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting
2021$12,023$13,756$14,797$9,304 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 rated schools reporting
2022$12,839$16,464$15,708$10,649 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,011 rated schools reporting
2023$16,373$20,319$16,792$11,166 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,027 rated schools reporting
2024$22,286$19,759$18,125$12,287 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,047 rated schools reporting
2025$21,289$19,980$18,972$13,067 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,059 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$52,992−$13,673 vs similar economic context
Teachers
9−34.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.9−5.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ranger HS

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 14.3%6 to 10 years: 15.4%11 to 20 years: 45.1%21 to 30 years: 17.6%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 14.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 15.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 45.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting for every category shown · 2,075 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ranger HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRanger HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English1215.4
Secondary languages other than English15.718.2
Secondary math1116.4
Secondary science9.717.7
Secondary social studies1517.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 10

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 15

    Per-student spending

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Science — Meets

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

18 measures

  • 4of 47

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 4of 47

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 4of 14

    School Progress

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 14

    Relative Performance

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 10

    Social Studies — Masters

    Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    Overall score

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    All Subjects — Meets

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Science — Approaches

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 5of 14

    Science — Masters

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 6of 15

    Reading — Meets

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 6of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 15

    Student Achievement

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 7of 14

    Academic Growth

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 10

    Social Studies — Meets

    Eastland County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 15

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Eastland County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Math — Meets

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 14

    Math — Masters

    Eastland County · of the 14 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 067907001.