Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ralls MS

Crosby County · Region 17: Lubbock · 67 students

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
+19 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−6.8 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,138 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,590 of 2,138tied with 37 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 57 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.8 average for 2,138 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

18.6% −1.8 pts vs 20.4%

  • 18.6% is 1.8 percentage points lower than the 20.4% average among 2,051 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ralls MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.8 average for 2,138 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 19 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,590th of 2,138 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 37 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged, Continuously Enrolled

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

2026-27 school year

Public Education Grant transfer eligibility

Students assigned to this campus may request a transfer under the state's PEG program.

A request is not guaranteed. A receiving district may apply its enrollment rules, and transportation is not automatically provided.

Read the official PEG rules and list

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
33.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,138 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
6.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,138 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageRalls MS 5259465671 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 57 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7177.8 2,138 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25F5677.5 2,126 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F4674.9 2,110 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5975.5 2,093 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22F5281.6 2,075 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement56 F−16.8 vs similar economic context · 1,976 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,970 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps72 C−3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,956 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,920 reporting
  • Relative Performance58 F−19.4 vs similar economic context · 1,970 reporting
  • Ralls MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,138 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement56F4
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps72C8
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance58F2

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (70), so Student Achievement (56) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 70.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level54%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting
  • Meets grade level19%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting
  • Masters grade level5%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,974 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level50%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,965 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level31%−37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
  • Meets grade level7%−32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 806 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,138 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
67
Economically disadvantaged
79.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.5%−20.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.4%−2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
18.6%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ralls MS

African American: 3%Hispanic: 79.1%White: 17.9%
  • African American 3%
  • Hispanic 79.1%
  • White 17.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,138 reporting for every category shown · 2,138 in full cohort

African American: 14%Hispanic: 66.5%White: 14.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 14%
  • Hispanic 66.5%
  • White 14.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
67
Economically disadvantaged students
53
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
11

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
98
TEA-published mobility rate
16.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
33

33.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
73

74.49 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
98

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
33.7%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,586 rated schools reporting

+20.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
74.49
Selected comparison
32.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,690 rated schools reporting

+41.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ralls MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 134 21 15.7% 33 24.63 8.6% 17
2021–22 121 42 34.7% 71 58.68 12.9% 31.1
2022–23 115 32 27.8% 53 46.09 13.7% 34.2
2023–24 108 28 25.9% 67 62.04 13.7% 34.1
2024–25 98 33 33.7% 73 74.49 13.4% 32.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ralls MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 33 33.7% 73 74.49 13.4% 32.6
In-school suspensions 30 30.6% 53 54.08 11.8% 23.7
Out-of-school suspensions 11 11.2% 12 12.24 8.1% 12.9
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Ralls MS
  • Parent district: Ralls ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,684
Selected comparison
$13,054

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 rated schools reporting

−$3,370 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,684 per student for this campus, $19,958 per student for its parent district, Ralls ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearRalls MSParent district: Ralls ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,829$12,749$13,054$8,103 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,010 rated schools reporting
2019$7,652$13,720$13,108$8,237 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2020$9,041$14,451$14,058$8,750 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 rated schools reporting
2021$8,761$16,083$14,797$9,385 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 rated schools reporting
2022$9,355$15,931$15,708$10,764 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,076 rated schools reporting
2023$10,640$17,080$16,792$11,249 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,093 rated schools reporting
2024$9,455$17,090$18,125$12,267 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,110 rated schools reporting
2025$9,684$19,958$18,972$13,054 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,397−$3,572 vs similar economic context
Teachers
6−37.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.6−2.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ralls MS

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 48.3%11 to 20 years: 19%21 to 30 years: 15.5%Over 30 years: 12.1%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 48.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 19%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.5%
  • Over 30 years 12.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,138 reporting for every category shown · 2,138 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ralls MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classRalls MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 613.117.8
Secondary English13.615.3
Secondary languages other than English818.2
Secondary math10.516.5
Secondary science1317.8
Secondary social studies11.117.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 054903041.