Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

R Q Sims Int

Limestone County · Region 12: Waco · 418 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,216 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,683 of 2,216tied with 124 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.5 average for 2,216 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

78 +3.4 pts vs 74.6

  • 78 is 3.4 points above the 74.6 average among 2,027 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

R Q Sims Int is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.5 average for 2,216 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,683rd of 2,216 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 124 others).

3 consecutive years rated unacceptable. At three or more years, Texas law provides for state intervention.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Continuously Enrolled

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

2026-27 school year

Public Education Grant transfer eligibility

Students assigned to this campus may request a transfer under the state's PEG program.

A request is not guaranteed. A receiving district may apply its enrollment rules, and transportation is not automatically provided.

Read the official PEG rules and list

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
34.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
7.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageR Q Sims Int 7159595969 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6977.5 2,216 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25F5977.1 2,201 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5974.5 2,186 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5975.0 2,168 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7181.6 2,148 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement60 D−12.0 vs similar economic context · 2,048 reporting
  • School Progress68 D−10.7 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps78 C+3.4 vs similar economic context · 2,027 reporting
  • Academic Growth68 D−4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,994 reporting
  • Relative Performance63 D−14.0 vs similar economic context · 2,041 reporting
  • R Q Sims Int
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,216 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement60D10
School Progress68D2
Closing the Gaps78C2
Academic Growth68D2
Relative Performance63D7

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (68), so Student Achievement (60) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 68.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level60%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Meets grade level29%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level38%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Meets grade level17%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,216 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
418
Economically disadvantaged
81.1%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.0%−7.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
27.5%+8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.9%−8.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

R Q Sims Int

African American: 20.3%Hispanic: 58.1%White: 14.4%Asian: 0.7%Pacific Islander: 0.5%Two or More Races: 6%
  • African American 20.3%
  • Hispanic 58.1%
  • White 14.4%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 reporting for every category shown · 2,216 in full cohort

African American: 14.1%Hispanic: 68.9%White: 12.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 14.1%
  • Hispanic 68.9%
  • White 12.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
418
Economically disadvantaged students
339
Emergent bilingual students
96
Special education students
115

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
39
Students in TEA mobility denominator
453
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 418 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 10 (2.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
418

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−10

Decrease · −2.3%

Change since 2022–23
+32

Increase · +8.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
418
Selected comparison
627.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,187 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for R Q Sims Int
School yearStudents enrolledR Q Sims IntChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 Not reported Not available —
2022–23 386 No adjacent prior year 656.7
2023–24 387 Increase of 1 (0.3%) 650.2
2024–25 428 Increase of 41 (10.6%) 646.8
2025–26 418 Decrease of 10 (2.3%) 627.2

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
47

10.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
84

18.54 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
453

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.4%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 rated schools reporting

−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
18.54
Selected comparison
32.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,723 rated schools reporting

−13.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for R Q Sims Int
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 413 29 7.0% 51 12.35 8.3% 16.4
2021–22 398 52 13.1% 91 22.86 12.9% 31
2022–23 402 50 12.4% 91 22.64 13.8% 34.1
2023–24 422 29 6.9% 46 10.90 13.8% 34.2
2024–25 453 47 10.4% 84 18.54 13.3% 32.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for R Q Sims Int in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 47 10.4% 84 18.54 13.3% 32.4
In-school suspensions 44 9.7% 79 17.44 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • R Q Sims Int
  • Parent district: Mexia ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,344
Selected comparison
$13,095

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 rated schools reporting

−$3,751 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,344 per student for this campus, $16,790 per student for its parent district, Mexia ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearR Q Sims IntParent district: Mexia ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,862$15,137$13,054$8,154 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,081 rated schools reporting
2019$7,216$12,447$13,108$8,269 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,107 rated schools reporting
2020$7,538$12,223$14,058$8,772 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,121 rated schools reporting
2021$8,231$13,446$14,797$9,435 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,131 rated schools reporting
2022$8,893$14,413$15,708$10,857 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,149 rated schools reporting
2023$9,200$15,889$16,792$11,397 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,168 rated schools reporting
2024$9,907$17,620$18,125$12,371 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,185 rated schools reporting
2025$9,344$16,790$18,972$13,095 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$57,563−$9,704 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−9.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.6−1.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

R Q Sims Int

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 43.1%6 to 10 years: 22.9%11 to 20 years: 11.4%21 to 30 years: 11.4%Over 30 years: 5.7%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 43.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 11.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.4%
  • Over 30 years 5.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,216 reporting for every category shown · 2,216 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for R Q Sims Int in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classR Q Sims Int · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 31818.9
Grade 415.719
Grade 517.120.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 88 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

4 measures

  • 6of 10

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 7of 10

    Overall score

    Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 10

    Attendance

    Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

  • 8of 10

    Per-student spending

    Limestone County · of the 10 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 147903105.