+12.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,220 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
219 of 2,220tied with 79 others
Score vs region
+6.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
337 of 1,303tied with 65 others
Score vs county
+6.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
239 of 911tied with 40 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,272 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
727 of 4,272tied with 170 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,220 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,272 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 40.6% avg · +14.4 pts
Masters
27%vs 16.1% avg · +10.9 pts
Among 2,058 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Pyburn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,220 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 219th of 2,220 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).
Pyburn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 337th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 65 others).
Pyburn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 239th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 40 others).
Pyburn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,272 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 727th of 4,272 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 170 others).
Pyburn Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+11.6 vs similar economic context · 2,058 reporting
School Progress90 A+11.2 vs similar economic context · 2,054 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 2,038 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+8.0 vs similar economic context · 2,020 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+13.2 vs similar economic context · 2,053 reporting
Pyburn Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,220 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level81%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Meets grade level55%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Masters grade level27%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,057 reporting
Meets grade level62%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,057 reporting
Masters grade level34%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,057 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
Meets grade level55%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
Masters grade level25%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,050 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting
Meets grade level38%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting
Masters grade level17%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,935 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,220 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
429
Economically disadvantaged
91.4%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
51.7%+11.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.4%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.7%−11.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Pyburn Elem
African American 3%
Hispanic 95.8%
White 0.9%
Asian 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 reporting for every category shown · 2,220 in full cohort
African American 14.8%
Hispanic 76.1%
White 5.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,272 reporting for every category shown · 4,272 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
429
Economically disadvantaged students
392
Emergent bilingual students
222
Special education students
79
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
37
Students in TEA mobility denominator
370
TEA-published mobility rate
10%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 429 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 25 (5.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
429
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−25
Decrease · −5.5%
Change since 2021–22
−50
Decrease · −10.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
429
Selected comparison
575.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,197 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Pyburn Elem
School year
Students enrolledPyburn Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
479
First available year
620.5
2022–23
461
Decrease of 18 (3.8%)
617
2023–24
461
No change
607.3
2024–25
454
Decrease of 7 (1.5%)
600.7
2025–26
429
Decrease of 25 (5.5%)
575.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
477
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pyburn Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
576
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
506
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
481
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
516
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
477
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pyburn Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Pyburn Elem
Parent district: Galena Park ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$13,916
Selected comparison
$13,221
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,199 rated schools reporting
+$695 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $13,916 per student for this campus, $16,675 per student for its parent district, Galena Park ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Pyburn Elem
Parent district: Galena Park ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,545
$16,605
$13,054
$8,321
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,091 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,232
$14,159
$13,108
$8,333
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,119 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,255
$14,134
$14,058
$8,842
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,125 rated schools reporting
2021
$11,062
$15,211
$14,797
$9,654
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,129 rated schools reporting
2022
$43,453
$16,274
$15,708
$11,214
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,146 rated schools reporting
2023
$39,941
$18,149
$16,792
$11,745
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,172 rated schools reporting
2024
$21,543
$17,805
$18,125
$12,620
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting
2025
$13,916
$16,675
$18,972
$13,221
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,199 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,973+$4,752 vs similar economic context
Teachers
35−5.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.3−2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Pyburn Elem
Beginning 8.6%
1 to 5 years 19.8%
6 to 10 years 31.2%
11 to 20 years 26.4%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,220 reporting for every category shown · 2,220 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.2%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,272 reporting for every category shown · 4,272 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Pyburn Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPyburn Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
12.7
18.1
Grade 1
20
18.3
Grade 2
18.5
18.3
Grade 3
16.5
18.5
Grade 4
19.5
18.5
Grade 5
21
19.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
80of 2,057
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,057 that report this measure · tied with 13
106of 2,057
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,057 that report this measure · tied with 17
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101910109.