Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Poteet JH

Atascosa County · Region 20: San Antonio · 393 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
71/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−8.1 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,569 of 2,019tied with 46 others
C71

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 71 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 79.1 average for 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
50%vs 42.9% avg · +7.1 pts
Masters
20%vs 18.7% avg · +1.3 pts

Among 1,740 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Poteet JH is rated C by TEA, scoring 71 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.1 average for 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,569th of 2,019 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Targeted Support and Improvement

Official support label: TSI

Identification reason: Continuously Enrolled

TEA track year 0 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
29.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
4.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePoteet JH 6976537571 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 71 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7179.1 2,019 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7578.8 2,001 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24F5376.7 1,985 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7677.3 1,960 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6982.0 1,941 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement67 D−8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
  • School Progress72 C−8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps68 D−8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,875 reporting
  • Academic Growth72 C−1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
  • Poteet JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement67D3
School Progress72C8
Closing the Gaps68D2
Academic Growth72C8
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (72), so Student Achievement (67) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level63%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,892 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Meets grade level24%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,740 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,740 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,740 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level42%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Meets grade level14%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,019 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
393
Economically disadvantaged
70.7%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
9.4%−11.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
25.7%+6.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.4%−2.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
31.7%+13.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Poteet JH

African American: 0.8%Hispanic: 85.5%White: 12.7%Asian: 0.3%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 0.5%
  • African American 0.8%
  • Hispanic 85.5%
  • White 12.7%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

African American: 12.4%Hispanic: 57.3%White: 24.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 12.4%
  • Hispanic 57.3%
  • White 24.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
393
Economically disadvantaged students
278
Emergent bilingual students
37
Special education students
101

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
56
Students in TEA mobility denominator
431
TEA-published mobility rate
13%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 393 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
393

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
0

No change

Change since 2021–22
+7

Increase · +1.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
393
Selected comparison
636.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,983 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Poteet JH
School yearStudents enrolledPoteet JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 386 First available year 648.4
2022–23 413 Increase of 27 (7.0%) 655.4
2023–24 409 Decrease of 4 (1.0%) 653.8
2024–25 393 Decrease of 16 (3.9%) 652.2
2025–26 393 No change 636.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
66

15.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
168

38.98 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
431

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
15.3%
Selected comparison
13.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,544 rated schools reporting

+2.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
38.98
Selected comparison
30.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting

+8.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Poteet JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 396 71 17.9% 160 40.40 9.5% 18.8
2021–22 436 109 25.0% 279 63.99 12.9% 30.2
2022–23 453 143 31.6% 469 103.53 13.5% 32.4
2023–24 443 101 22.8% 355 80.14 13.3% 32.2
2024–25 431 66 15.3% 168 38.98 13.0% 30.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Poteet JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 66 15.3% 168 38.98 13.0% 30.8
In-school suspensions 48 11.1% 80 18.56 11.6% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions 28 6.5% 57 13.23 7.4% 11.1
DAEP placements 26 6.0% 31 7.19 5.2% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements 17 3.9% 19 4.41 3.7% 4.3
Discretionary DAEP placements 11 2.5% 12 2.78 3.0% 3.5
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Poteet JH
  • Parent district: Poteet ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,375
Selected comparison
$13,180

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting

−$3,805 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,375 per student for this campus, $18,459 per student for its parent district, Poteet ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPoteet JHParent district: Poteet ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,990$10,442$13,054$8,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,864 rated schools reporting
2019$6,063$10,617$13,108$8,200 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 rated schools reporting
2020$6,852$11,608$14,058$8,743 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 rated schools reporting
2021$7,345$12,817$14,797$9,245 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 rated schools reporting
2022$7,617$13,454$15,708$10,509 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,942 rated schools reporting
2023$7,080$13,437$16,792$11,212 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 rated schools reporting
2024$8,322$16,309$18,125$12,402 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2025$9,375$18,459$18,972$13,180 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,702−$3,761 vs similar economic context
Teachers
28−14.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−0.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Poteet JH

Beginning: 15.8%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 16.9%11 to 20 years: 26.4%21 to 30 years: 18%
  • Beginning 15.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 26.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 18%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,019 reporting for every category shown · 2,019 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.6%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.9%11 to 20 years: 27.5%21 to 30 years: 15.4%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.4%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Poteet JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPoteet JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 628.617.9
Secondary English26.915.2
Secondary languages other than English24.817.9
Secondary math28.416.2
Secondary science31.417.5
Secondary social studies25.517.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 6of 15

    Science — Masters

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 15

    Academic Growth

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 15

    Science — Meets

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 8of 16

    Reading — Masters

    Atascosa County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 15

    Science — Approaches

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 9of 15

    Math — Masters

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    Social Studies — Meets

    Atascosa County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 9of 11

    Social Studies — Masters

    Atascosa County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 10of 16

    Reading — Approaches

    Atascosa County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 10of 15

    School Progress

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure

  • 10of 15

    Closing the Gaps

    Atascosa County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 11

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Atascosa County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 007906041.