Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ponder JH

Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 432 students

Current score
82/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.5 ptsvs 83.5 average · 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
849 of 1,469tied with 64 others
B82

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83.5 average for 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
71%vs 55.6% avg · +15.4 pts
Masters
38%vs 27.7% avg · +10.3 pts

Among 1,321 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ponder JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.5 average for 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 849th of 1,469 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePonder JH 8883807782 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8283.5 1,469 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7783.9 1,438 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8082.0 1,416 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8382.5 1,401 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8884.7 1,380 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement78 C−5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,425 reporting
  • School Progress82 B−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,422 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,413 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,398 reporting
  • Relative Performance70 C−9.4 vs similar economic context · 1,422 reporting
  • Ponder JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,469 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement78C2
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance70C10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 8 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,425 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,424 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,420 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
  • Meets grade level71%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 733 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 733 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 733 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,469 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
432
Economically disadvantaged
43.1%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
16.2%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.4%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.6%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ponder JH

African American: 0.9%Hispanic: 37%White: 59.5%Asian: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 0.9%
  • Hispanic 37%
  • White 59.5%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 reporting for every category shown · 1,469 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 37.2%White: 44.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 37.2%
  • White 44.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
432
Economically disadvantaged students
186
Emergent bilingual students
70
Special education students
101

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
32
Students in TEA mobility denominator
413
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 389 students in 2024–25.

Latest available PEIMS enrollment
389

2024–25

Enrollment in 2024–25

This school
389
Selected comparison
694.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,412 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ponder JH
School yearStudents enrolledPonder JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 376 First available year 691.4
2022–23 381 Increase of 5 (1.3%) 696.9
2023–24 Not reported Not available —
2024–25 389 No adjacent prior year 694.6
2025–26 Not reported Not available —

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
57

13.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
137

33.17 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
413

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
13.8%
Selected comparison
11.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,133 rated schools reporting

+2.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
33.17
Selected comparison
24

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,217 rated schools reporting

+9.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ponder JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 401 40 10.0% 61 15.21 9.2% 17.4
2021–22 396 41 10.3% 68 17.17 11.2% 24
2022–23 403 81 20.1% 140 34.74 11.5% 25.2
2023–24 382 66 17.3% 120 31.41 11.4% 25.8
2024–25 413 57 13.8% 137 33.17 11.1% 24
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ponder JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 57 13.8% 137 33.17 11.1% 24
In-school suspensions 52 12.6% 99 23.97 9.9% 18.4
Out-of-school suspensions 16 3.9% 24 5.81 5.4% 7.5
DAEP placements 12 2.9% 14 3.39 4.1% 4.8
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$23k$41k20182020202220242025
  • Ponder JH
  • Parent district: Ponder ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,558
Selected comparison
$12,006

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting

−$2,448 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,558 per student for this campus, $21,803 per student for its parent district, Ponder ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPonder JHParent district: Ponder ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,614$12,292$13,054$7,784 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,322 rated schools reporting
2019$6,494$11,263$13,108$7,991 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,342 rated schools reporting
2020$6,670$12,173$14,058$8,407 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,350 rated schools reporting
2021$6,700$12,931$14,797$8,817 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,369 rated schools reporting
2022$7,141$38,640$15,708$10,190 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 rated schools reporting
2023$7,645$32,862$16,792$10,624 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
2024$8,976$23,214$18,125$11,650 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,417 rated schools reporting
2025$9,558$21,803$18,972$12,006 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,245+$2,054 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−15.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7−6.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ponder JH

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 21.4%6 to 10 years: 22.7%11 to 20 years: 32.9%21 to 30 years: 16.3%Over 30 years: 1.7%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.3%
  • Over 30 years 1.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,469 reporting for every category shown · 1,469 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.4%1 to 5 years: 23.6%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 30.5%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ponder JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPonder JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 620.118
Secondary English15.515.5
Secondary languages other than English19.518
Secondary math19.616.6
Secondary science21.418
Secondary social studies23.618

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061906041.