Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Pleasanton ISD School of Choice

Atascosa County · Region 20: San Antonio · 12 students

Current score
69/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−14.8 ptsvs 83.8 average · 1,423 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,365 of 1,423tied with 17 others
D69

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 83.8 average for 1,423 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pleasanton ISD School of Choice is rated D by TEA, scoring 69 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.8 average for 1,423 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,365th of 1,423 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this school ranks best
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePleasanton ISD School of Choice 748469 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6983.8 1,423 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—84.1 1,392 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24Not Rated—82.4 1,370 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8482.9 1,354 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7484.9 1,333 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement69 D−15.2 vs similar economic context · 1,382 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 82.3 · 1,379 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 81.1 · 1,370 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 77.4 · 1,355 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.5 · 1,379 reporting
  • Pleasanton ISD School of Choice
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,423 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement69D1
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level33%−47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,382 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−57 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,382 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,382 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level0%−82 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−62 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,381 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 77.8% · 1,377 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 50.8% · 1,377 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 21.6% · 1,377 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 81.2% · 1,281 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 56.2% · 1,281 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 28.2% · 1,281 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 710 reporting
  • Meets grade level0%−54 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 710 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 710 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,423 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
81.8%−3.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 18 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
86.7%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 18 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
82.4%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 18 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
9.1%+5.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 18 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
36.0%−52.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria36.0%88.4%−52.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%59.5%−59.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%33.3%−33.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%13.1%−13.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%36.2%−36.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification7.1%38.1%−31.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%4.2%−4.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.9%−5.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness7.1%2.8%+4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student14.3%7.3%+7.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces7.1%3.3%+3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
12
Economically disadvantaged
41.7%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−11.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
50.0%+31.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
67.9%−26.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
90.9%+78.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Pleasanton ISD School of Choice

Hispanic: 75%White: 25%
  • Hispanic 75%
  • White 25%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting for every category shown · 1,423 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.6%White: 44.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.6%
  • White 44.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
12
Economically disadvantaged students
5
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
6

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
23
TEA-published mobility rate
95.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
23

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pleasanton ISD School of Choice
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 37 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 35 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 16 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 24 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2024–25 23 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pleasanton ISD School of Choice in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$20k$34k20182020202220242025
  • Pleasanton ISD School of Choice
  • Parent district: Pleasanton ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,723
Selected comparison
$12,030

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 rated schools reporting

−$1,307 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,723 per student for this campus, $15,449 per student for its parent district, Pleasanton ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPleasanton ISD School of ChoiceParent district: Pleasanton ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,565$12,035$13,054$7,798 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,272 rated schools reporting
2019$11,578$12,150$13,108$8,004 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,292 rated schools reporting
2020$7,983$12,852$14,058$8,382 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,301 rated schools reporting
2021$6,709$14,369$14,797$8,789 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,321 rated schools reporting
2022$7,641$14,824$15,708$10,123 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,334 rated schools reporting
2023$11,860$16,477$16,792$10,569 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,354 rated schools reporting
2024$13,970$17,792$18,125$11,640 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,371 rated schools reporting
2025$10,723$15,449$18,972$12,030 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,393 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$81,408+$14,069 vs similar economic context
Teachers
1−44.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−2.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pleasanton ISD School of Choice

11 to 20 years: 100%
  • 11 to 20 years 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,423 reporting for every category shown · 1,423 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 23.4%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 30.7%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 134 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 14

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

9 measures

  • 4of 14

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 14

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 14

    Four-Year Completion Rate

    Region 20: San Antonio (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 7of 11

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Atascosa County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 8of 14

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 20

    Per-student spending

    Atascosa County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 14

    Five-Year Completion Rate

    Region 20: San Antonio (alternative-education accountability only) · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 14

    College, career or military ready

    Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 10of 11

    Social Studies — Masters

    Atascosa County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 007905005.