+12.0 ptsvs 80 average · 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
153 of 1,997tied with 39 others
Score vs region
+11.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi
Region 02: Corpus Christi placement
14 of 191tied with 5 others
Score vs county
+9.5 ptsvs 82.5 average · 97 rated schools in Nueces County
Nueces County placement
7 of 97tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 314 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
48 of 314tied with 10 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is above the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 314 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
77%vs 48.2% avg · +28.8 pts
Masters
40%vs 19.7% avg · +20.3 pts
Among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Petronila Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 153rd of 1,997 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 39 others).
Petronila Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 5 others).
Petronila Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.5 average for 97 rated schools in Nueces County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 97 rated schools in Nueces County (tied with 3 others).
Petronila Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 314 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 48th of 314 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 10 others).
Petronila Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,894 reporting
School Progress93 A+12.2 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,867 reporting
Academic Growth91 A+17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,829 reporting
Relative Performance93 A+13.9 vs similar economic context · 1,886 reporting
Petronila Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
93
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
91
A
—
Relative Performance
93
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level95%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level77%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level40%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Meets grade level82%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Masters grade level47%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,890 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Meets grade level84%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Masters grade level44%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Meets grade level50%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Masters grade level15%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,733 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,997 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
88
Economically disadvantaged
64.0%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
14.0%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.9%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.2%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.7%−10.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Petronila Elem
Hispanic 79.1%
White 19.8%
Two or More Races 1.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 51.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 77.5%
White 17.9%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
African American 3%
Hispanic 77.7%
White 15.9%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 7.3%
Hispanic 47.3%
White 41.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
86
Economically disadvantaged students
55
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
18
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
17
Students in TEA mobility denominator
89
TEA-published mobility rate
19.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 88 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 22 (20.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
88
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−22
Decrease · −20.0%
Change since 2021–22
−13
Decrease · −12.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
88
Selected comparison
621.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Petronila Elem
School year
Students enrolledPetronila Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
101
First available year
636.2
2022–23
98
Decrease of 3 (3.0%)
642.6
2023–24
98
No change
639.3
2024–25
110
Increase of 12 (12.2%)
634.5
2025–26
88
Decrease of 22 (20.0%)
621.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
11
9.40 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
117
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
9.4
Selected comparison
30.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 rated schools reporting
−20.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Petronila Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
105
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
110
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
105
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
102
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
117
Suppressed
—
11
9.40
—
30.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Petronila Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
11
9.40
—
30.2
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Petronila Elem
Parent district: Bishop CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,137
Selected comparison
$12,664
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting
−$1,527 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,137 per student for this campus, $20,036 per student for its parent district, Bishop CISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Petronila Elem
Parent district: Bishop CISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,997
$11,496
$13,054
$7,923
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,824 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,002
$15,582
$13,108
$8,080
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,840 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,357
$18,930
$14,058
$8,666
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,631
$14,218
$14,797
$9,091
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting
2022
$11,670
$16,500
$15,708
$10,433
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 rated schools reporting
2023
$12,419
$18,642
$16,792
$11,145
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,920 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,629
$18,398
$18,125
$12,064
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,949 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,137
$20,036
$18,972
$12,664
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,431−$943 vs similar economic context
Teachers
8−34.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.8−3.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Petronila Elem
1 to 5 years 12.5%
6 to 10 years 12.5%
11 to 20 years 62.5%
21 to 30 years 12.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 reporting for every category shown · 1,997 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Beginning 5%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Nueces County · 97 reporting for every category shown · 97 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.1%
1 to 5 years 23.1%
6 to 10 years 16.3%
11 to 20 years 26.1%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 6.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Petronila Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classPetronila Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
8
18
Grade 1
13
18.2
Grade 2
17
18.4
Grade 3
23
18.6
Grade 4
25
19
Grade 5
21
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 177
Attendance
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 177 that report this measure
1of 79
Science — Approaches
Nueces County · of the 79 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 164
Math — Meets
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure
2of 161
Academic Growth
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 161 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 82
Reading — Approaches
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 82
Math — Masters
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
4of 87
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Nueces County · of the 87 that report this measure
4of 82
All Subjects — Approaches
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 82
Reading — Masters
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure
5of 164
All Subjects — Masters
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure
5of 82
School Progress
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure
5of 82
Relative Performance
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure
5of 82
All Subjects — Meets
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 164
Reading — Meets
Region 02: Corpus Christi · of the 164 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 82
Student Achievement
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure
6of 82
Math — Approaches
Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178902103.