Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Pampa HS

Gray County · Region 16: Amarillo · 958 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
+17 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.4 ptsvs 81.6 average · 1,762 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
489 of 1,762tied with 88 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.6 average for 1,762 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 6 points

81 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 5.4 points above the 81.6 average among 1,762 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 14 points

73 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 8.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,674 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
63%vs 50.9% avg · +12.1 pts
Masters
25%vs 23.9% avg · +1.1 pts

Among 1,556 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pampa HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.6 average for 1,762 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 17 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 489th of 1,762 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 88 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePampa HS 7074758187 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8781.6 1,762 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8181.7 1,738 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7579.6 1,713 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7480.3 1,686 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7083.1 1,662 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+5.0 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.6 vs similar economic context · 1,689 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,674 reporting
  • Academic Growth75 C−0.3 vs similar economic context · 1,650 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.7 vs similar economic context · 1,689 reporting
  • Pampa HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,762 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth75C5
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level77%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Meets grade level50%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 881 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,762 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.6%+4.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
92.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
89.7%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 450 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+9.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%88.1%+9.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course87.1%58.7%+28.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA16.5%28.7%−12.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)13.7%10.4%+3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course25.3%33.5%−8.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification22.9%38.6%−15.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.8%1.5%−0.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree3.6%4.8%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness4.8%3.2%+1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student12.0%7.7%+4.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.2%3.5%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
241

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
82

34.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
153

63.5% of graduates

Not trackable
6

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
241
Selected comparison
219.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
82
Selected comparison
95.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
34.0%
Selected comparison
45.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

−11.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
63.5%
Selected comparison
50.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

+13.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
2.5%
Selected comparison
4.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 380 rated schools reporting

−2.1 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003665)25
  2. CLARENDON COLLEGE (003554)23

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
958
Economically disadvantaged
52.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.4%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.0%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
91.1%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
29.4%+14.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Pampa HS

African American: 2.7%Hispanic: 49.4%White: 45.5%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.1%
  • African American 2.7%
  • Hispanic 49.4%
  • White 45.5%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,762 reporting for every category shown · 1,762 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 42.6%White: 40%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 42.6%
  • White 40%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
958
Economically disadvantaged students
506
Emergent bilingual students
167
Special education students
192

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
142
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,072
TEA-published mobility rate
13.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 958 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 54 (5.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
958

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−54

Decrease · −5.3%

Change since 2021–22
−71

Decrease · −6.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
958
Selected comparison
640.6

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,722 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Pampa HS
School yearStudents enrolledPampa HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,029 First available year 642.6
2022–23 1,046 Increase of 17 (1.7%) 648.7
2023–24 1,055 Increase of 9 (0.9%) 648.1
2024–25 1,012 Decrease of 43 (4.1%) 645.1
2025–26 958 Decrease of 54 (5.3%) 640.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
249

23.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
600

55.97 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,072

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
23.2%
Selected comparison
12.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 rated schools reporting

+10.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
55.97
Selected comparison
27.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,472 rated schools reporting

+28.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Pampa HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,130 251 22.2% 841 74.42 9.7% 18.9
2021–22 1,121 292 26.1% 998 89.03 12.2% 27.5
2022–23 1,129 324 28.7% 1,228 108.77 12.7% 29.2
2023–24 1,118 313 28.0% 1,059 94.72 12.7% 29.4
2024–25 1,072 249 23.2% 600 55.97 12.3% 27.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Pampa HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 249 23.2% 600 55.97 12.3% 27.4
In-school suspensions 218 20.3% 480 44.78 11.0% 21.1
Out-of-school suspensions 47 4.4% 59 5.50 6.2% 8.9
DAEP placements 54 5.0% 61 5.69 4.6% 5.4
Mandatory DAEP placements 33 3.1% 37 3.45 3.4% 3.9
Discretionary DAEP placements 22 2.0% 24 2.24 2.6% 2.9
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Pampa HS
  • Parent district: Pampa ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,988
Selected comparison
$12,184

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 rated schools reporting

−$2,196 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,988 per student for this campus, $14,386 per student for its parent district, Pampa ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPampa HSParent district: Pampa ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,321$9,965$13,054$7,879 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,607 rated schools reporting
2019$6,722$9,919$13,108$8,050 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,622 rated schools reporting
2020$7,139$9,299$14,058$8,595 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting
2021$7,170$10,750$14,797$8,983 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
2022$8,207$11,514$15,708$10,251 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,665 rated schools reporting
2023$8,229$11,839$16,792$10,812 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting
2024$9,227$12,808$18,125$11,721 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,710 rated schools reporting
2025$9,988$14,386$18,972$12,184 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,735 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,653+$2,033 vs similar economic context
Teachers
65+22.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9−4.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pampa HS

Beginning: 1.6%1 to 5 years: 19.4%6 to 10 years: 25.3%11 to 20 years: 26%21 to 30 years: 18.6%Over 30 years: 9%
  • Beginning 1.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 19.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 25.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 26%
  • 21 to 30 years 18.6%
  • Over 30 years 9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,762 reporting for every category shown · 1,762 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.8%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 28.9%21 to 30 years: 16.5%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.5%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Pampa HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPampa HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English13.315
Secondary languages other than English19.517.5
Secondary math15.315.9
Secondary science17.317.4
Secondary social studies12.217.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 9of 65

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 16: Amarillo · of the 65 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 090904001.