Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Paint Rock School

Concho County · Region 15: San Angelo · 232 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+14 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.8 ptsvs 78.2 average · 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
679 of 2,090tied with 80 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.2 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

81 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 4.8 points above the 78.2 average among 2,090 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 6 points

76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 82 is 6.6 points above the 75.4 average among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

84 +4.6 pts vs 79.4

  • 84 is 4.6 points above the 79.4 average among 1,931 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Paint Rock School is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average for 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 14 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 679th of 2,090 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 80 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averagePaint Rock School 6978858183 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8378.2 2,090 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8177.8 2,079 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8575.5 2,067 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7876.0 2,044 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6981.8 2,026 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement84 B+10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,936 reporting
  • School Progress84 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+6.6 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−13.6 vs similar economic context · 1,878 reporting
  • Relative Performance84 B+6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,931 reporting
  • Paint Rock School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement84B6
School Progress84B6
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance84B6

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level63%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,936 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level52%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
  • Meets grade level21%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,926 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,782 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 813 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,090 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+6.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 354 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+14.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%86.0%+14.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course76.9%58.4%+18.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%25.2%−25.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%11.9%−11.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course84.6%31.9%+52.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification53.8%37.0%+16.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.5%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.5%−7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.0%−5.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student23.1%8.2%+14.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces7.7%2.9%+4.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
232
Economically disadvantaged
76.3%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.6%−19.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.4%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.9%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Paint Rock School

African American: 0.4%Hispanic: 49.6%White: 45.3%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 0.4%
  • Hispanic 49.6%
  • White 45.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort

African American: 13.4%Hispanic: 63.6%White: 17.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3%
  • African American 13.4%
  • Hispanic 63.6%
  • White 17.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
232
Economically disadvantaged students
177
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
52

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
41
Students in TEA mobility denominator
214
TEA-published mobility rate
19.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 232 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (8.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
232

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+19

Increase · +8.9%

Change since 2021–22
+18

Increase · +8.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
232
Selected comparison
636.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,063 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Paint Rock School
School yearStudents enrolledPaint Rock SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 214 First available year 654.5
2022–23 216 Increase of 2 (0.9%) 657.6
2023–24 181 Decrease of 35 (16.2%) 654.7
2024–25 213 Increase of 32 (17.7%) 652.6
2025–26 232 Increase of 19 (8.9%) 636.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
19

7.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
23

9.39 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
245

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.8%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,568 rated schools reporting

−5.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
9.39
Selected comparison
31.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,672 rated schools reporting

−22.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Paint Rock School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 254 34 13.4% 61 24.02 8.9% 17.8
2021–22 233 45 19.3% 79 33.91 12.9% 30.8
2022–23 241 51 21.2% 82 34.02 13.5% 33.4
2023–24 212 15 7.1% 21 9.91 13.5% 33.3
2024–25 245 19 7.8% 23 9.39 13.2% 31.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Paint Rock School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 19 7.8% 23 9.39 13.2% 31.8
In-school suspensions 17 6.9% 17 6.94 11.6% 23.3
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$21k$34k20182020202220242025
  • Paint Rock School
  • Parent district: Paint Rock ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$23,026
Selected comparison
$13,025

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 rated schools reporting

+$10,001 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $23,026 per student for this campus, $30,532 per student for its parent district, Paint Rock ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearPaint Rock SchoolParent district: Paint Rock ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,579$16,091$13,054$8,044 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2019$10,882$16,109$13,108$8,201 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,979 rated schools reporting
2020$12,526$21,056$14,058$8,738 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,997 rated schools reporting
2021$12,810$19,662$14,797$9,313 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,009 rated schools reporting
2022$16,729$19,214$15,708$10,614 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 rated schools reporting
2023$16,355$30,874$16,792$11,263 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,044 rated schools reporting
2024$21,193$32,487$18,125$12,267 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,065 rated schools reporting
2025$23,026$30,532$18,972$13,025 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$61,736−$5,027 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−21.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.6−3.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Paint Rock School

Beginning: 24.2%1 to 5 years: 28.3%6 to 10 years: 8.2%11 to 20 years: 16.4%21 to 30 years: 8.2%Over 30 years: 14.6%
  • Beginning 24.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 8.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 16.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.2%
  • Over 30 years 14.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,090 reporting for every category shown · 2,090 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.5%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15.2%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Paint Rock School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classPaint Rock School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1618
Grade 11518.2
Grade 21818.3
Grade 31518.7
Grade 41519
Grade 51320
Grade 61118
Secondary English16.215.5
Secondary languages other than English1518.2
Secondary math16.416.5
Secondary science20.217.8
Secondary social studies16.717.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

2 measures

  • 2of 47

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 3of 47

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 4of 122

    Per-student spending

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 122 that report this measure

  • 7of 47

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 15: San Angelo · of the 47 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 048903001.