Top placement
Earned a level I or level II certificate
9.2% 3rd of 263 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Orangefield HS
Orange County · Region 05: Beaumont · 529 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 86/1002025-26
- Change
- +8 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −1.9 ptsvs 87.9 average · 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 646 of 950tied with 36 others
- Score vs region
- +10.6 ptsvs 75.4 average · 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont
- Region 05: Beaumont placement
- 26 of 150tied with 5 others
- Score vs county
- +10.5 ptsvs 75.5 average · 23 rated schools in Orange County
- Orange County placement
- 4 of 23among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +5.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,769 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 1,547 of 4,769tied with 168 others
- Score vs state
- +4.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 2,764 of 7,646tied with 299 others
B86
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 87.9 average for 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont.The current score is above the 75.5 average for 23 rated schools in Orange County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,769 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
92 +3.3 pts vs 88.7
- 92 is 3.3 points above the 88.7 average among 929 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the similar-context average
84 +4.1 pts vs 79.9
- 84 is 4.1 points above the 79.9 average among 927 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Top placement
Social Studies — Masters
55% 3rd of 72 schools in Region 05: Beaumont reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Social Studies — Meets
90% 3rd of 72 schools in Region 05: Beaumont reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
All Subjects above Region 05: Beaumont averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 66%vs 44.6% avg · +21.4 pts
- Masters
- 22%vs 16.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Among 133 schools in Region 05: Beaumont reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Student Achievement above the Orange County average
92 +16.9 pts vs 75.1
- 92 is 16.9 points above the 75.1 average among 20 schools in Orange County reporting this measure.
- 1st of 20 schools in Orange County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Social Studies — Masters
55% 1st of 11 schools in Orange County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Science — Meets
80% Tied for 1st of 17 schools in Orange County reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureSTAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 80%vs 42.4% avg · +37.6 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 20.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Among 4,154 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the similar-size average
86 +5.8 pts vs 80.2
- 86 is 5.8 points above the 80.2 average among 4,769 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the similar-size average
84 +3.8 pts vs 80.2
- 84 is 3.8 points above the 80.2 average among 4,561 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 80%vs 47.1% avg · +32.9 pts
- Masters
- 27%vs 22.8% avg · +4.2 pts
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
Overall score above the Texas average
86 +4.7 pts vs 81.3
- 86 is 4.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
School Progress above the Texas average
84 +2.8 pts vs 81.2
- 84 is 2.8 points above the 81.2 average among 7,238 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Orangefield HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 87.9 average for 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 646th of 950 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).
Orangefield HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 75.4 average for 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 26th of 150 rated schools in Region 05: Beaumont (tied with 5 others).
Orangefield HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 75.5 average for 23 rated schools in Orange County. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 23 rated schools in Orange County.
Orangefield HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,769 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,547th of 4,769 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 168 others).
Orangefield HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,764th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 299 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this school serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Discipline and removal from class
- Spending per student
- Teachers and actual class size
- Where this school ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 86 | 87.9 950 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | A | 90 | 87.8 936 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 86 | 86.5 922 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 81 | 86.9 906 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 78 | 88.0 892 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Orangefield HS
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (950 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 92 | A | — |
| School Progress | 84 | B | 6 |
| Closing the Gaps | 71 | C | 9 |
| Academic Growth | 72 | C | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 84 | B | 6 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 9 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (950 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 97.5%+5.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 261 rated schools reporting
- Five-Year
- 98.4%+6.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 261 rated schools reporting
- Six-Year
- 99.2%+8.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 262 rated schools reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 0.7%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 262 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 92.0%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 92.0% | 88.8% | +3.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 262 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 41.2% | 65.2% | −24.0 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 27.7% | 45.2% | −17.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 4.2% | 22.4% | −18.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 47.1% | 38.6% | +8.5 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 60.5% | 33.7% | +26.8 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 9.2% | 0.6% | +8.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.6% | −4.6 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 7.3% | −7.3 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 7.6% | 2.5% | +5.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 2.5% | 6.6% | −4.1 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 4.2% | 3.0% | +1.2 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 263 rated schools reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 122
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 62
50.8% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 57
46.7% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This school
- 122
- Selected comparison
- 318.3
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This school
- 62
- Selected comparison
- 154.6
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This school
- 50.8%
- Selected comparison
- 49.7%
Not-found rate
- This school
- 46.7%
- Selected comparison
- 43.3%
Not-trackable rate
- This school
- 2.5%
- Selected comparison
- 7.0%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- LAMAR UNIVERSITY (003581)20
- LAMAR STATE COLL-ORANGE (023582)16
- TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 529
- Economically disadvantaged
- 27.6%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 2.5%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 12.7%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 15.2%+5.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Orangefield HS
- African American 1.5%
- Hispanic 12.3%
- White 81.3%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.5%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting for every category shown · 950 in full cohort
- African American 8.9%
- Hispanic 28.7%
- White 48.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 8.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison average For Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
- African American 20.1%
- Hispanic 22.9%
- White 50.9%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison average For Orange County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
- African American 11.8%
- Hispanic 16.9%
- White 65.5%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,769 reporting for every category shown · 4,769 in full cohort
- African American 12.2%
- Hispanic 54.9%
- White 24.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 529
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 146
- Emergent bilingual students
- 13
- Special education students
- 67
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 54
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 589
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 9.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 529 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 34 (6.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 529
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −34
Decrease · −6.0%
- Change since 2021–22
- 0
No change
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 529
- Selected comparison
- 814.8
| School year | Students enrolledOrangefield HS | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 529 | First available year | 830.5 |
| 2022–23 | 549 | Increase of 20 (3.8%) | 835 |
| 2023–24 | 541 | Decrease of 8 (1.5%) | 828.9 |
| 2024–25 | 563 | Increase of 22 (4.1%) | 825.1 |
| 2025–26 | 529 | Decrease of 34 (6.0%) | 814.8 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 118
20.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 358
60.78 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 589
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 20.0%
- Selected comparison
- 8.3%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 60.78
- Selected comparison
- 16.6
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 560 | 55 | 9.8% | 148 | 26.43 | 6.6% | 11.7 |
| 2021–22 | 566 | 92 | 16.3% | 269 | 47.53 | 8.8% | 17.6 |
| 2022–23 | 576 | 107 | 18.6% | 218 | 37.85 | 9.1% | 18.3 |
| 2023–24 | 565 | 102 | 18.1% | 230 | 40.71 | 8.6% | 17.6 |
| 2024–25 | 589 | 118 | 20.0% | 358 | 60.78 | 8.3% | 16.6 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 118 | 20.0% | 358 | 60.78 | 8.3% | 16.6 |
| In-school suspensions | 101 | 17.1% | 243 | 41.26 | 7.5% | 13.1 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 36 | 6.1% | 78 | 13.24 | 4.1% | 5.5 |
| DAEP placements | 28 | 4.8% | 35 | 5.94 | 3.0% | 3.4 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Orangefield HS
- Parent district: Orangefield ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $12,030
- Selected comparison
- $11,424
For 2025, TEA reported $12,030 per student for this campus, $19,104 per student for its parent district, Orangefield ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Orangefield HS | Parent district: Orangefield ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $10,172 | $11,393 | $13,054 | $7,612 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 840 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $9,452 | $14,971 | $13,108 | $7,705 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 854 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $10,321 | $13,756 | $14,058 | $8,033 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 864 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $11,529 | $11,403 | $14,797 | $8,502 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $11,596 | $12,219 | $15,708 | $9,701 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 891 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $11,998 | $13,184 | $16,792 | $10,181 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 907 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $11,839 | $13,742 | $18,125 | $11,369 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 921 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $12,030 | $19,104 | $18,972 | $11,424 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 935 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $62,113−$6,256 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 47−5.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.1−3.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Orangefield HS
- 1 to 5 years 18.4%
- 6 to 10 years 22.6%
- 11 to 20 years 35.7%
- 21 to 30 years 20.7%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 950 reporting for every category shown · 950 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.8%
- 1 to 5 years 22.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 32.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.4%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 05: Beaumont · 150 reporting for every category shown · 150 in full cohort
- Beginning 8.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26%
- 6 to 10 years 18.2%
- 11 to 20 years 25.1%
- 21 to 30 years 15.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Orange County · 23 reporting for every category shown · 23 in full cohort
- Beginning 4.5%
- 1 to 5 years 29.4%
- 6 to 10 years 20.7%
- 11 to 20 years 24.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.2%
- Over 30 years 4.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,769 reporting for every category shown · 4,769 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 26.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.7%
- Over 30 years 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classOrangefield HS · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 14.6 | 16.9 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 21.4 | 19.2 |
| Secondary math | 16.3 | 17.6 |
| Secondary science | 21 | 19.3 |
| Secondary social studies | 20.1 | 19.4 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
8 measures
-
1of 20
Student Achievement
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
1of 20
All Subjects — Approaches
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
1of 20
All Subjects — Meets
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
1of 20
Math — Approaches
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 17
Science — Meets
Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
1of 11
Social Studies — Approaches
Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
1of 11
Social Studies — Meets
Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure
-
1of 11
Social Studies — Masters
Orange County · of the 11 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
-
2of 20
Reading — Meets
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
3of 263
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 263 that report this measure
-
3of 20
School Progress
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
3of 20
Relative Performance
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure
-
3of 20
All Subjects — Masters
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 17
Science — Masters
Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
-
4of 37
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure
-
4of 23
Overall score
Orange County · of the 23 that report this measure
-
4of 20
Reading — Approaches
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 17
Science — Approaches
Orange County · of the 17 that report this measure
-
5of 23
Per-student spending
Orange County · of the 23 that report this measure
-
7of 22
Attendance
Orange County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 37
Earned an industry-based certification
Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure
-
9of 20
Math — Meets
Orange County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 37
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Region 05: Beaumont (standard accountability only) · of the 37 that report this measure
-
10of 37
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 05: Beaumont · of the 37 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 181905001.