Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus
Jim Wells County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 352 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is level with the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi.The current score is below the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 3,449 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
STAAR result
Among 1,894 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 1,890 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 1,730 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 164 schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 159 schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
86 +4.1 pts vs 81.9
Top placement
32% 2nd of 14 schools in Jim Wells County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
10.8% 2nd-lowest of 15 schools in Jim Wells County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
33% 3rd of 14 schools in Jim Wells County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 3,193 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 2,905 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
86 +5.4 pts vs 80.6
STAAR result
Among 7,254 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureSTAAR result
Among 6,717 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
86 +4.8 pts vs 81.2
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Orange Grove JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 951st of 1,996 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).
Orange Grove JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 80.7 average for 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 105th of 191 rated schools in Region 02: Corpus Christi (tied with 7 others).
Orange Grove JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 15 rated schools in Jim Wells County (tied with 1 other).
Orange Grove JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 3,449 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,727th of 3,449 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 119 others).
Orange Grove JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4,141st of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 260 others).
Put the numbers in context
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
2026 federal improvement status
Official support label: TSI
Identification reason: Special Education
TEA track year 0 · Title I campus
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 81 | 80.0 1,996 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 83 | 79.8 1,971 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 81 | 77.9 1,951 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 88 | 78.4 1,918 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | C | 78 | 82.2 1,894 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 80 | B | 10 |
| School Progress | 86 | B | 4 |
| Closing the Gaps | 69 | D | 1 |
| Academic Growth | 79 | C | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 86 | B | 4 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Orange Grove JH
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 reporting for every category shown · 1,996 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,449 reporting for every category shown · 3,449 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 352 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 5 (1.4%) from 2024–25.
2025–26
Decrease · −1.4%
Decrease · −12.4%
| School year | Students enrolledOrange Grove JH | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 402 | First available year | 637.3 |
| 2022–23 | 396 | Decrease of 6 (1.5%) | 643.8 |
| 2023–24 | 379 | Decrease of 17 (4.3%) | 640.6 |
| 2024–25 | 357 | Decrease of 22 (5.8%) | 635.5 |
| 2025–26 | 352 | Decrease of 5 (1.4%) | 622.7 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
18.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
37.70 per 100 students
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 456 | 96 | 21.1% | 266 | 58.33 | 9.7% | 19.4 |
| 2021–22 | 435 | 127 | 29.2% | 384 | 88.28 | 12.8% | 29.7 |
| 2022–23 | 421 | 153 | 36.3% | 395 | 93.82 | 13.3% | 31.9 |
| 2023–24 | 397 | 78 | 19.6% | 180 | 45.34 | 13.1% | 31.6 |
| 2024–25 | 382 | 71 | 18.6% | 144 | 37.70 | 12.9% | 30.2 |
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 71 | 18.6% | 144 | 37.70 | 12.9% | 30.2 |
| In-school suspensions | 52 | 13.6% | 105 | 27.49 | 11.6% | 23.1 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | 31 | 8.1% | 34 | 8.90 | 5.0% | 6 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | 31 | 8.1% | 34 | 8.90 | 2.8% | 3.3 |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
For 2025, TEA reported $7,142 per student for this campus, $14,585 per student for its parent district, Orange Grove ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
| Year | Orange Grove JH | Parent district: Orange Grove ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $5,810 | $10,634 | $13,054 | $7,924 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,822 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,035 | $13,270 | $13,108 | $8,081 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,838 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $6,545 | $11,226 | $14,058 | $8,668 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,861 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $7,535 | $12,231 | $14,797 | $9,094 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $7,742 | $12,685 | $15,708 | $10,439 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,058 | $13,262 | $16,792 | $11,147 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,918 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $6,765 | $13,699 | $18,125 | $12,066 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,947 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $7,142 | $14,585 | $18,972 | $12,664 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,967 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Orange Grove JH
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,996 reporting for every category shown · 1,996 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 02: Corpus Christi · 191 reporting for every category shown · 191 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Jim Wells County · 15 reporting for every category shown · 15 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,449 reporting for every category shown · 3,449 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
| Grade or subject | Average students per classOrange Grove JH · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 20.3 | 17.7 |
| Secondary English | 13.5 | 15.1 |
| Secondary math | 19.6 | 15.9 |
| Secondary science | 22.3 | 17.3 |
| Secondary social studies | 22 | 17.2 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
Reading — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
Science — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Reading — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Science — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Fourth- through tenth-place results
13 measures
Attendance
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure
Academic Growth
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Reading — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Science — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Student Achievement
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
All Subjects — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
All Subjects — Masters
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
School Progress
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
Relative Performance
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
All Subjects — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Math — Approaches
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Math — Meets
Jim Wells County · of the 14 that report this measure
Overall score
Jim Wells County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 125903041.