Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HSA98vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
Ector County · Region 18: Midland · 482 students
Current score
98/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.1 ptsvs 82.9 average · 1,568 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
6 of 1,568tied with 6 others
Score vs region
+20.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland
Region 18: Midland placement
2 of 157tied with 1 other
Score vs county
+20.1 ptsvs 77.9 average · 42 rated schools in Ector County
Ector County placement
1 of 42among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+17.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,634 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
26 of 4,634tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+16.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
35 of 7,646tied with 46 others
A98
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.9 average for 1,568 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland.The current score is above the 77.9 average for 42 rated schools in Ector County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,634 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 2 points
98 to 1002024-25 to 2025-26
100 is 19.7 points above
the 80.3 average among 1,504 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 1,504 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 7 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.9 average for 1,568 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 1,568 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 6 others).
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 157 rated schools in Region 18: Midland (tied with 1 other).
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.9 average for 42 rated schools in Ector County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 42 rated schools in Ector County.
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,634 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 26th of 4,634 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 98 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,519 reporting
School Progress97 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,515 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+19.7 vs similar economic context · 1,504 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+5.5 vs similar economic context · 1,487 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+17.6 vs similar economic context · 1,515 reporting
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,568 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level98%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,519 reporting
Meets grade level88%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,519 reporting
Masters grade level34%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,519 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
Meets grade level91%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
Masters grade level23%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,517 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Meets grade level70%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Masters grade level27%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
Meets grade level93%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
Masters grade level50%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
Meets grade level93%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
Masters grade level47%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 790 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,568 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 430 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 429 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
88.6%
+11.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 439 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
64.9%
59.9%
+5.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
59.6%
31.1%
+28.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
1.8%
11.6%
−9.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
100.0%
34.2%
+65.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
38.5%
−38.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
95.6%
3.6%
+92.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
5.1%
−5.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
2.9%
−2.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
7.5%
−7.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.9%
3.4%
−2.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 440 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
98
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
74
75.5% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
21
21.4% of graduates
Not trackable
3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
98
Selected comparison
221.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
74
Selected comparison
97.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
75.5%
Selected comparison
46.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
+28.9 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
21.4%
Selected comparison
49.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
−27.6 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
3.1%
Selected comparison
4.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 370 rated schools reporting
−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS PERMIAN BASIN (009930)35
ODESSA COLLEGE (003596)12
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
482
Economically disadvantaged
45.9%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.4%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.0%−17.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
3.1%−10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
African American 2.1%
Hispanic 73.2%
White 17.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,568 reporting for every category shown · 1,568 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 38.6%
White 43.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
African American 3.4%
Hispanic 72.1%
White 20.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Ector County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
African American 3.4%
Hispanic 81.4%
White 12%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,634 reporting for every category shown · 4,634 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
482
Economically disadvantaged students
221
Emergent bilingual students
31
Special education students
5
Early college pathways
Early College High School
482
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
14
Students in TEA mobility denominator
484
TEA-published mobility rate
2.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 482 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (1.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
482
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+6
Increase · +1.3%
Change since 2021–22
+110
Increase · +29.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
482
Selected comparison
671.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,529 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
School year
Students enrolledOdessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
372
First available year
669.7
2022–23
429
Increase of 57 (15.3%)
675
2023–24
460
Increase of 31 (7.2%)
674.8
2024–25
476
Increase of 16 (3.5%)
671.3
2025–26
482
Increase of 6 (1.3%)
671.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
480
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
346
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
380
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
438
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
466
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
480
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
Parent district: Ector County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$5,956
Selected comparison
$11,977
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 rated schools reporting
−$6,021 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $5,956 per student for this campus, $13,905 per student for its parent district, Ector County ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
Parent district: Ector County ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,642
$8,820
$13,054
$7,808
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,413 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,065
$9,133
$13,108
$8,001
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,432 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,863
$9,712
$14,058
$8,472
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,443 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,197
$11,838
$14,797
$8,886
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 rated schools reporting
2022
$6,821
$12,512
$15,708
$10,200
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,474 rated schools reporting
2023
$6,603
$13,039
$16,792
$10,623
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,491 rated schools reporting
2024
$6,479
$13,842
$18,125
$11,614
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,508 rated schools reporting
2025
$5,956
$13,905
$18,972
$11,977
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,535 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,791+$3,688 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−23.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
24.4+3.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS
1 to 5 years 10.1%
6 to 10 years 10.1%
11 to 20 years 60.6%
21 to 30 years 7.6%
Over 30 years 11.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,568 reporting for every category shown · 1,568 in full cohort
Beginning 5.5%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 18: Midland · 157 reporting for every category shown · 157 in full cohort
Beginning 7.8%
1 to 5 years 27.9%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 24.1%
21 to 30 years 13.1%
Over 30 years 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Ector County · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 29.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 25.9%
21 to 30 years 12.2%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,634 reporting for every category shown · 4,634 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Odessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classOdessa Collegiate Academy Early College HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
25.9
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
25.4
17.7
Secondary math
26.3
16.3
Secondary science
29.7
17.8
Secondary social studies
24.7
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
14 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 440
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 440 that report this measure · tied with 6
1of 67
Social Studies — Meets
Region 18: Midland · of the 67 that report this measure
1of 42
Overall score
Ector County · of the 42 that report this measure
1of 38
Student Achievement
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 38
School Progress
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Relative Performance
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
All Subjects — Approaches
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 38
All Subjects — Meets
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 38
Math — Approaches
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Science — Meets
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Science — Masters
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 38
Attendance
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 12
Social Studies — Approaches
Ector County · of the 12 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
9 measures
2of 38
All Subjects — Masters
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 38
Reading — Approaches
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 38
Reading — Meets
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 38
Math — Meets
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 38
Science — Approaches
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 12
Social Studies — Masters
Ector County · of the 12 that report this measure
3of 440
Earned an associate degree
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 440 that report this measure
3of 43
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 18: Midland · of the 43 that report this measure
3of 38
Math — Masters
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
3 measures
4of 38
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
5of 38
Academic Growth
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 38
Reading — Masters
Ector County · of the 38 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 068901015.