Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Oakwood Terrace ElemC77vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Oakwood Terrace Elem
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 801 students
Current score
77/1002025-26
Change
−11 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−0.4 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,257 of 2,285tied with 69 others
Score vs region
−3.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
533 of 839tied with 25 others
Score vs county
−3.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
290 of 466tied with 15 others
Score vs similar-size group
−3.9 ptsvs 80.9 average · 3,755 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,479 of 3,755tied with 101 others
Score vs state
−4.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5,228 of 7,646tied with 203 others
C77
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 77.4 average for 2,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is below the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is below the 80.9 average for 3,755 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
46%vs 41.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Masters
21%vs 16.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 2,118 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Oakwood Terrace Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 77.4 average for 2,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,257th of 2,285 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 69 others).
Oakwood Terrace Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 533rd of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 25 others).
Oakwood Terrace Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 290th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 15 others).
Oakwood Terrace Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.9 average for 3,755 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,479th of 3,755 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 101 others).
Oakwood Terrace Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,285 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
7.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,285 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement74 C+2.6 vs similar economic context · 2,118 reporting
School Progress82 B+3.4 vs similar economic context · 2,111 reporting
Closing the Gaps65 D−9.6 vs similar economic context · 2,096 reporting
Academic Growth68 D−4.2 vs similar economic context · 2,066 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 2,111 reporting
Oakwood Terrace Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,285 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
74
C
6
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
65
D
5
Academic Growth
68
D
2
Relative Performance
82
B
8
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level70%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 reporting
Meets grade level46%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 reporting
Masters grade level21%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,118 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,117 reporting
Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,117 reporting
Masters grade level26%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,117 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,107 reporting
Meets grade level45%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,107 reporting
Masters grade level19%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,107 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level62%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 reporting
Meets grade level30%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 reporting
Masters grade level11%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,285 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
801
Economically disadvantaged
83.8%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
64.9%+31.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.5%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.3%−13.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Oakwood Terrace Elem
African American 16.4%
Hispanic 53.3%
White 11.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 12.7%
Pacific Islander 3.5%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,285 reporting for every category shown · 2,285 in full cohort
African American 14.5%
Hispanic 71.4%
White 10%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,755 reporting for every category shown · 3,755 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.5%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
795
Economically disadvantaged students
666
Emergent bilingual students
516
Special education students
115
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
154
Students in TEA mobility denominator
683
TEA-published mobility rate
22.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 801 students in 2025–26, an increase of 24 (3.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
801
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+24
Increase · +3.1%
Change since 2021–22
+94
Increase · +13.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
801
Selected comparison
616.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,255 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Oakwood Terrace Elem
School year
Students enrolledOakwood Terrace Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
707
First available year
647.8
2022–23
718
Increase of 11 (1.6%)
646.9
2023–24
768
Increase of 50 (7.0%)
640
2024–25
777
Increase of 9 (1.2%)
636.8
2025–26
801
Increase of 24 (3.1%)
616.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
78
8.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
173
19.59 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
883
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
8.8%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting
−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
19.59
Selected comparison
32
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,704 rated schools reporting
−12.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Oakwood Terrace Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
611
38
6.2%
55
9.00
7.9%
15.4
2021–22
775
99
12.8%
218
28.13
12.7%
30.4
2022–23
788
88
11.2%
175
22.21
13.7%
33.7
2023–24
853
94
11.0%
204
23.92
13.7%
33.8
2024–25
883
78
8.8%
173
19.59
13.3%
32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Oakwood Terrace Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
78
8.8%
173
19.59
13.3%
32
In-school suspensions
78
8.8%
172
19.48
11.8%
23.2
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Oakwood Terrace Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,698
Selected comparison
$13,241
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,270 rated schools reporting
−$4,543 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,698 per student for this campus, $17,072 per student for its parent district, Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Oakwood Terrace Elem
Parent district: Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,723
$10,047
$13,054
$8,255
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,159 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,537
$11,598
$13,108
$8,339
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,824
$15,516
$14,058
$8,850
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,197 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,831
$12,690
$14,797
$9,554
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,203
$12,184
$15,708
$11,023
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,221 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,518
$14,299
$16,792
$11,495
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,241 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,404
$15,258
$18,125
$12,438
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,255 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,698
$17,072
$18,972
$13,241
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,270 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,131+$3,605 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48+5.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.6+2.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Oakwood Terrace Elem
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 25.1%
6 to 10 years 18.8%
11 to 20 years 37.8%
21 to 30 years 10.4%
Over 30 years 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,285 reporting for every category shown · 2,285 in full cohort
Beginning 7.1%
1 to 5 years 27.4%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,755 reporting for every category shown · 3,755 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.7%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Oakwood Terrace Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classOakwood Terrace Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.7
18
Grade 1
21.7
18.4
Grade 2
18.7
18.4
Grade 3
16.4
18.8
Grade 4
21.2
18.8
Grade 5
26
19.8
Grade 6
21.2
17.6
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
2 measures
90of 2,188
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,188 that report this measure · tied with 17
108of 2,182
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,182 that report this measure · tied with 8
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220916106.