Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Nitsch Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 620 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+13.8 ptsvs 77.2 average · 2,369 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
130 of 2,369tied with 74 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.2 average for 2,369 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
65%vs 40.8% avg · +24.2 pts
Masters
36%vs 15.9% avg · +20.1 pts

Among 2,205 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 37.9% avg · +36.1 pts
Masters
42%vs 14.3% avg · +27.7 pts

Among 2,194 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
68%vs 44.8% avg · +23.2 pts
Masters
38%vs 17.6% avg · +20.4 pts

Among 2,204 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Nitsch Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.2 average for 2,369 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 130th of 2,369 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 74 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageNitsch Elem 9489909291 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9177.2 2,369 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25A9277.0 2,356 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9073.9 2,339 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8974.3 2,325 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9481.7 2,298 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+20.1 vs similar economic context · 2,205 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+13.6 vs similar economic context · 2,198 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps88 B+13.6 vs similar economic context · 2,184 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+10.8 vs similar economic context · 2,155 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+15.4 vs similar economic context · 2,198 reporting
  • Nitsch Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,369 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps88B2
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance92A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (92), so Student Achievement (91) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,205 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,205 reporting
  • Masters grade level36%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,205 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,204 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,194 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,194 reporting
  • Masters grade level42%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,194 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,053 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,369 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
620
Economically disadvantaged
85.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
43.9%+8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.8%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
17.1%−5.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Nitsch Elem

African American: 28.8%Hispanic: 61.2%White: 5.2%American Indian: 1%Asian: 1.3%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 28.8%
  • Hispanic 61.2%
  • White 5.2%
  • American Indian 1%
  • Asian 1.3%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,369 reporting for every category shown · 2,369 in full cohort

African American: 14.2%Hispanic: 73%White: 8.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 2%
  • African American 14.2%
  • Hispanic 73%
  • White 8.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
619
Economically disadvantaged students
529
Emergent bilingual students
272
Special education students
129

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
130
Students in TEA mobility denominator
613
TEA-published mobility rate
21.2%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 620 students in 2025–26, an increase of 8 (1.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
620

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+8

Increase · +1.3%

Change since 2021–22
−11

Decrease · −1.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
620
Selected comparison
611.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,341 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Nitsch Elem
School yearStudents enrolledNitsch ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 631 First available year 644.1
2022–23 663 Increase of 32 (5.1%) 641.9
2023–24 608 Decrease of 55 (8.3%) 635.4
2024–25 612 Increase of 4 (0.7%) 632.5
2025–26 620 Increase of 8 (1.3%) 611.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
14

2.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
20

2.84 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
705

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
2.0%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,624 rated schools reporting

−11.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
2.84
Selected comparison
32.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 rated schools reporting

−29.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Nitsch Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 760 33 4.3% 54 7.11 7.7% 15
2021–22 711 13 1.8% 27 3.80 12.7% 30.2
2022–23 762 38 5.0% 60 7.87 13.6% 33.6
2023–24 708 37 5.2% 109 15.40 13.8% 34
2024–25 705 14 2.0% 20 2.84 13.3% 32.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Nitsch Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 14 2.0% 20 2.84 13.3% 32.1
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Nitsch Elem
  • Parent district: Klein ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,675
Selected comparison
$13,259

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,353 rated schools reporting

+$416 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,675 per student for this campus, $16,739 per student for its parent district, Klein ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearNitsch ElemParent district: Klein ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,671$12,935$13,054$8,262 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,232 rated schools reporting
2019$9,491$12,174$13,108$8,322 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,262 rated schools reporting
2020$8,695$10,934$14,058$8,847 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,272 rated schools reporting
2021$9,609$12,557$14,797$9,544 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,278 rated schools reporting
2022$11,816$13,000$15,708$11,026 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,298 rated schools reporting
2023$9,791$13,779$16,792$11,561 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,323 rated schools reporting
2024$13,728$17,266$18,125$12,468 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,338 rated schools reporting
2025$13,675$16,739$18,972$13,259 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,353 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$72,260+$4,643 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55+12.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.3−3.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Nitsch Elem

Beginning: 1.8%1 to 5 years: 16.4%6 to 10 years: 29.1%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 21.8%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 1.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 16.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 29.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 21.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,369 reporting for every category shown · 2,369 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.2%1 to 5 years: 27.4%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Nitsch Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classNitsch Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten16.318.2
Grade 120.718.5
Grade 220.318.4
Grade 313.118.8
Grade 41318.8
Grade 58.619.9

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

11 measures

  • 22of 2,194

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,194 that report this measure

  • 30of 2,194

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,194 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 37of 2,204

    Reading — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,204 that report this measure · tied with 9

  • 38of 2,205

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,205 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 67of 2,205

    Student Achievement

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,205 that report this measure · tied with 25

  • 67of 2,204

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,204 that report this measure · tied with 7

  • 68of 2,205

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,205 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 76of 2,194

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,194 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 77of 2,198

    Relative Performance

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,198 that report this measure · tied with 38

  • 79of 2,205

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,205 that report this measure · tied with 15

  • 81of 2,204

    Reading — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,204 that report this measure · tied with 18

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101915112.