Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
5% −9.2 pts vs 14.2%
- 5% is 9.2 percentage points lower than the 14.2% average among 1,644 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
New Waverly Elem
Walker County · Region 06: Huntsville · 320 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 76/1002025-26
- Change
- −12 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- −6.1 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,254 of 1,691tied with 57 others
- Score vs region
- −4.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
- Region 06: Huntsville placement
- 212 of 314tied with 12 others
- Score vs county
- +2.2 ptsvs 73.8 average · 12 rated schools in Walker County
- Walker County placement
- 4 of 12tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- −4.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 3,036 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 2,089 of 3,036tied with 77 others
- Score vs state
- −5.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,432 of 7,646tied with 208 others
C76
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 73.8 average for 12 rated schools in Walker County.The current score is below the 80.5 average for 3,036 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
96.4% +1.8 pts vs 94.6%
- 96.4% is 1.8 percentage points above the 94.6% average among 1,644 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 06: Huntsville average
5% −9.6 pts vs 14.6%
- 5% is 9.6 percentage points lower than the 14.6% average among 303 schools in Region 06: Huntsville reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 06: Huntsville average
96.4% +1.7 pts vs 94.7%
- 96.4% is 1.7 percentage points above the 94.7% average among 304 schools in Region 06: Huntsville reporting this measure.
Top placement
Math — Meets
53% 2nd of 12 schools in Walker County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
All Subjects — Meets
53% Tied for 3rd of 12 schools in Walker County reporting this measure · 2025-26 · 2 share this value
See the full measureTop placement
Math — Masters
17% 3rd of 12 schools in Walker County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
5% −10.8 pts vs 15.8%
- 5% is 10.8 percentage points lower than the 15.8% average among 2,896 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-size average
96.4% +2 pts vs 94.4%
- 96.4% is 2 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 2,898 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
5% −11.7 pts vs 16.7%
- 5% is 11.7 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
96.4% +2.3 pts vs 94.1%
- 96.4% is 2.3 percentage points above the 94.1% average among 7,366 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
New Waverly Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,254th of 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 57 others).
New Waverly Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 212th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 12 others).
New Waverly Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 73.8 average for 12 rated schools in Walker County. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 12 rated schools in Walker County (tied with 2 others).
New Waverly Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 3,036 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,089th of 3,036 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 77 others).
New Waverly Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5,432nd of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 208 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 76 | 82.1 1,691 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 89 | 82.4 1,666 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 85 | 80.4 1,639 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 75 | 81.0 1,619 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 88 | 83.6 1,596 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- New Waverly Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 78 | C | 2 |
| School Progress | 77 | C | 3 |
| Closing the Gaps | 70 | C | 10 |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 77 | C | 3 |
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (78), so School Progress (77) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 320
- Economically disadvantaged
- 49.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 5.0%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.6%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 96.4%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 5.0%−9.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
New Waverly Elem
- African American 7.5%
- Hispanic 19.4%
- White 65.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.3%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
- African American 9.4%
- Hispanic 40.5%
- White 42.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 38.9%
- White 42.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison average For Walker County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- African American 19.7%
- Hispanic 30.5%
- White 42.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,036 reporting for every category shown · 3,036 in full cohort
- African American 11%
- Hispanic 53.6%
- White 29.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 2.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 319
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 158
- Emergent bilingual students
- 16
- Special education students
- 56
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 16
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 219
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 7.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 320 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 7 (2.1%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 320
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −7
Decrease · −2.1%
- Change since 2021–22
- +29
Increase · +10.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 320
- Selected comparison
- 647.3
| School year | Students enrolledNew Waverly Elem | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 291 | First available year | 648.7 |
| 2022–23 | 313 | Increase of 22 (7.6%) | 653.2 |
| 2023–24 | 301 | Decrease of 12 (3.8%) | 653.1 |
| 2024–25 | 327 | Increase of 26 (8.6%) | 649.9 |
| 2025–26 | 320 | Decrease of 7 (2.1%) | 647.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 32
9.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 53
15.27 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 347
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 9.2%
- Selected comparison
- 12.0%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 15.27
- Selected comparison
- 26.7
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 334 | 16 | 4.8% | 37 | 11.08 | 9.5% | 18.2 |
| 2021–22 | 317 | 22 | 6.9% | 49 | 15.46 | 11.9% | 26 |
| 2022–23 | 339 | 18 | 5.3% | 48 | 14.16 | 12.4% | 28 |
| 2023–24 | 322 | 12 | 3.7% | 24 | 7.45 | 12.3% | 28.3 |
| 2024–25 | 347 | 32 | 9.2% | 53 | 15.27 | 12.0% | 26.7 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 32 | 9.2% | 53 | 15.27 | 12.0% | 26.7 |
| In-school suspensions | 32 | 9.2% | 53 | 15.27 | 10.8% | 20.5 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- New Waverly Elem
- Parent district: New Waverly ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,439
- Selected comparison
- $12,052
For 2025, TEA reported $9,439 per student for this campus, $21,539 per student for its parent district, New Waverly ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | New Waverly Elem | Parent district: New Waverly ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $6,756 | $11,810 | $13,054 | $7,847 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,538 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $6,987 | $12,065 | $13,108 | $8,031 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,557 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,161 | $12,234 | $14,058 | $8,531 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,058 | $13,831 | $14,797 | $8,929 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,587 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,248 | $16,512 | $15,708 | $10,267 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $7,993 | $19,184 | $16,792 | $10,746 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,618 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $8,723 | $31,644 | $18,125 | $11,553 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,637 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,439 | $21,539 | $18,972 | $12,052 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $67,016+$95 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 26−16.5 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 12.3−7.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
New Waverly Elem
- Beginning 3.5%
- 1 to 5 years 14.6%
- 6 to 10 years 21.9%
- 11 to 20 years 45.8%
- 21 to 30 years 10.4%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 29.5%
- 21 to 30 years 16.7%
- Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison average For Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.5%
- 1 to 5 years 27.7%
- 6 to 10 years 18.9%
- 11 to 20 years 27.6%
- 21 to 30 years 13.6%
- Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison average For Walker County · 12 reporting for every category shown · 12 in full cohort
- Beginning 3.6%
- 1 to 5 years 32%
- 6 to 10 years 10.8%
- 11 to 20 years 22.4%
- 21 to 30 years 9.7%
- Over 30 years 4.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 3,036 reporting for every category shown · 3,036 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.1%
- 6 to 10 years 18.6%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 16.9%
- Over 30 years 4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classNew Waverly Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 19.1 | 17.9 |
| Grade 1 | 18.4 | 18.3 |
| Grade 2 | 18.6 | 18.5 |
| Grade 3 | 18.8 | 19 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 4 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 85 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
8 measures
-
2of 12
Math — Meets
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
All Subjects — Approaches
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 12
All Subjects — Meets
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 12
Reading — Approaches
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Reading — Masters
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Math — Masters
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Attendance
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
3of 12
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
-
4of 12
Overall score
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
4of 12
Student Achievement
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 12
All Subjects — Masters
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
4of 12
Math — Approaches
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
4of 12
Per-student spending
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
5of 12
School Progress
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
5of 12
Relative Performance
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
5of 12
Reading — Meets
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure
-
6of 12
Closing the Gaps
Walker County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 236901102.