Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

New Diana HS

Upshur County · Region 07: Kilgore · 339 students

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
+20 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+6.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 1,211 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
188 of 1,211tied with 115 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.7 average for 1,211 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 3 points

89 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 92 is 6.3 points above the 85.7 average among 1,211 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 10 points

83 to 93 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 93 is 9.9 points above the 83.1 average among 1,168 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
78%vs 59.5% avg · +18.5 pts
Masters
34%vs 31.4% avg · +2.6 pts

Among 1,087 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

New Diana HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 1,211 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 20 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 188th of 1,211 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 115 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageNew Diana HS 7283788992 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9285.7 1,211 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8985.6 1,187 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7884.2 1,172 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8384.5 1,159 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7286.3 1,142 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+5.8 vs similar economic context · 1,181 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,178 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+9.9 vs similar economic context · 1,168 reporting
  • Academic Growth59 F−20.0 vs similar economic context · 1,158 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+9.3 vs similar economic context · 1,178 reporting
  • New Diana HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,211 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A—
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth59F1
Relative Performance89B1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,181 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,181 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,181 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,180 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,180 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,180 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level86%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,177 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level99%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,087 reporting
  • Meets grade level78%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,087 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,087 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 610 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 610 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 610 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,211 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
98.8%+5.7 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.6%+5.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 346 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.5%+6.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+10.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria100.0%89.1%+10.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course66.7%62.9%+3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA32.1%38.1%−6.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)5.1%16.5%−11.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course29.5%37.1%−7.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification76.9%36.3%+40.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.0%−1.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%3.9%−3.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%6.3%−6.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness6.4%2.8%+3.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student11.5%7.1%+4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces3.8%3.3%+0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
72

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
40

55.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
32

44.4% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
72
Selected comparison
269.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
40
Selected comparison
129.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
55.6%
Selected comparison
48.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting

+6.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
44.4%
Selected comparison
45.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting

−1.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 301 rated schools reporting

−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. KILGORE COLLEGE (003580)16
  2. TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE (003648)6
  3. U. OF TEXAS AT TYLER (011163)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
339
Economically disadvantaged
35.7%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
1.8%−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.0%−9.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

New Diana HS

African American: 8.3%Hispanic: 10.3%White: 72%American Indian: 0.9%Asian: 0.9%Two or More Races: 7.7%
  • African American 8.3%
  • Hispanic 10.3%
  • White 72%
  • American Indian 0.9%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 7.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,211 reporting for every category shown · 1,211 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 32.6%White: 47.4%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.8%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 32.6%
  • White 47.4%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
339
Economically disadvantaged students
121
Emergent bilingual students
6
Special education students
27

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
26
Students in TEA mobility denominator
337
TEA-published mobility rate
7.7%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 339 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (2.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
339

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+9

Increase · +2.7%

Change since 2021–22
−9

Decrease · −2.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
339
Selected comparison
752

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,186 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for New Diana HS
School yearStudents enrolledNew Diana HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 348 First available year 764.1
2022–23 330 Decrease of 18 (5.2%) 764.8
2023–24 314 Decrease of 16 (4.8%) 764.8
2024–25 330 Increase of 16 (5.1%) 760.5
2025–26 339 Increase of 9 (2.7%) 752

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
37

11.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
60

17.80 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
337

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
11.0%
Selected comparison
10.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 931 rated schools reporting

+1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
17.8
Selected comparison
21.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,012 rated schools reporting

−3.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for New Diana HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 343 58 16.9% 107 31.20 8.2% 15.2
2021–22 364 71 19.5% 157 43.13 10.2% 21.3
2022–23 348 64 18.4% 102 29.31 10.6% 22.5
2023–24 329 45 13.7% 79 24.01 10.3% 22.7
2024–25 337 37 11.0% 60 17.80 10.0% 21.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for New Diana HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 37 11.0% 60 17.80 10.0% 21.2
In-school suspensions 29 8.6% 34 10.09 8.9% 16.3
Out-of-school suspensions 15 4.5% 15 4.45 4.9% 6.8
DAEP placements 11 3.3% 11 3.26 3.6% 4.3
Mandatory DAEP placements 11 3.3% 11 3.26 2.9% 3.3
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • New Diana HS
  • Parent district: New Diana ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,967
Selected comparison
$11,882

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 rated schools reporting

−$1,915 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,967 per student for this campus, $15,779 per student for its parent district, New Diana ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearNew Diana HSParent district: New Diana ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,396$9,973$13,054$7,668 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,085 rated schools reporting
2019$8,587$13,211$13,108$7,806 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,103 rated schools reporting
2020$9,106$12,727$14,058$8,144 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,110 rated schools reporting
2021$10,549$12,114$14,797$8,614 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,124 rated schools reporting
2022$10,572$13,193$15,708$9,795 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,141 rated schools reporting
2023$8,528$13,225$16,792$10,435 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,160 rated schools reporting
2024$12,007$12,969$18,125$11,565 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,172 rated schools reporting
2025$9,967$15,779$18,972$11,882 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,187 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,978−$804 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−25.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.2±0.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

New Diana HS

Beginning: 7.1%1 to 5 years: 15.5%6 to 10 years: 24.7%11 to 20 years: 31%21 to 30 years: 12.6%Over 30 years: 9.2%
  • Beginning 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 15.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 31%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.6%
  • Over 30 years 9.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,211 reporting for every category shown · 1,211 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.8%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.2%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.2%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for New Diana HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classNew Diana HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English8.716.2
Secondary languages other than English28.818.4
Secondary math9.717.1
Secondary science9.318.5
Secondary social studies14.618.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 184 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

3 measures

  • 1of 23

    Overall score

    Upshur County · of the 23 that report this measure

  • 1of 22

    Student Achievement

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 1of 22

    Closing the Gaps

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

7 measures

  • 2of 22

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 20

    Science — Approaches

    Upshur County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 22

    School Progress

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 22

    Relative Performance

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 22

    Reading — Approaches

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 3of 22

    Reading — Meets

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 13

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Upshur County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

8 measures

  • 4of 20

    Science — Meets

    Upshur County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 5of 22

    All Subjects — Meets

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 5of 22

    Math — Approaches

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Social Studies — Meets

    Upshur County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 6of 13

    Social Studies — Masters

    Upshur County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 22

    Attendance

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Science — Masters

    Upshur County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 22

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Upshur County · of the 22 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 230906001.