Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Nesmith Elem

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 572 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
72/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−10.0 ptsvs 82 average · 1,713 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,470 of 1,713tied with 50 others
C72

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82 average for 1,713 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Nesmith Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 72 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82 average for 1,713 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,470th of 1,713 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 50 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageNesmith Elem 7781727472 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7282.0 1,713 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7482.2 1,688 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7280.1 1,663 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8180.8 1,640 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7783.4 1,617 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement71 C−10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,649 reporting
  • School Progress66 D−15.5 vs similar economic context · 1,644 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps73 C−6.2 vs similar economic context · 1,629 reporting
  • Academic Growth66 D−9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,608 reporting
  • Relative Performance60 D−19.3 vs similar economic context · 1,644 reporting
  • Nesmith Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,713 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement71C9
School Progress66D4
Closing the Gaps73C7
Academic Growth66D4
Relative Performance60D10

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 7 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (71), so School Progress (66) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 71.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level67%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 reporting
  • Meets grade level47%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level63%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
  • Meets grade level35%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,641 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,521 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,713 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
572
Economically disadvantaged
50.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.2%+10.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.9%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.1%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
20.6%+6.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Nesmith Elem

African American: 36.4%Hispanic: 14.6%White: 35.2%American Indian: 0.9%Asian: 9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 36.4%
  • Hispanic 14.6%
  • White 35.2%
  • American Indian 0.9%
  • Asian 9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 reporting for every category shown · 1,713 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 41.2%White: 41.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 41.2%
  • White 41.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
568
Economically disadvantaged students
287
Emergent bilingual students
132
Special education students
130

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
110
Students in TEA mobility denominator
472
TEA-published mobility rate
23.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 572 students in 2025–26, an increase of 61 (11.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
572

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+61

Increase · +11.9%

Change since 2021–22
−101

Decrease · −15.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
572
Selected comparison
645.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,674 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Nesmith Elem
School yearStudents enrolledNesmith ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 673 First available year 649.3
2022–23 768 Increase of 95 (14.1%) 654.2
2023–24 590 Decrease of 178 (23.2%) 653.7
2024–25 511 Decrease of 79 (13.4%) 649.9
2025–26 572 Increase of 61 (11.9%) 645.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
60

10.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
191

32.05 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
596

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
10.1%
Selected comparison
12.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,323 rated schools reporting

−2.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
32.05
Selected comparison
27.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,419 rated schools reporting

+4.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Nesmith Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 611 22 3.6% 27 4.42 9.6% 18.4
2021–22 839 70 8.3% 126 15.02 11.9% 26.4
2022–23 866 103 11.9% 205 23.67 12.5% 28.4
2023–24 673 93 13.8% 193 28.68 12.5% 28.8
2024–25 596 60 10.1% 191 32.05 12.1% 27.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Nesmith Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 60 10.1% 191 32.05 12.1% 27.1
In-school suspensions 59 9.9% 169 28.36 10.9% 20.9
Out-of-school suspensions 15 2.5% 22 3.69 6.1% 8.6
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$24k$43k20182020202220242025
  • Nesmith Elem
  • Parent district: Community ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,870
Selected comparison
$12,044

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting

+$1,826 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,870 per student for this campus, $18,880 per student for its parent district, Community ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearNesmith ElemParent district: Community ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,095$11,238$13,054$7,831 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 rated schools reporting
2019$5,224$19,254$13,108$8,007 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting
2020$6,152$31,460$14,058$8,540 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,592 rated schools reporting
2021$7,111$22,425$14,797$8,953 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,608 rated schools reporting
2022$6,742$20,873$15,708$10,247 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2023$17,077$38,756$16,792$10,714 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,639 rated schools reporting
2024$27,372$41,188$18,125$11,562 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,661 rated schools reporting
2025$13,870$18,880$18,972$12,044 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,676+$7,849 vs similar economic context
Teachers
34−8.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.9−2.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Nesmith Elem

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 31.3%6 to 10 years: 13.1%11 to 20 years: 22.9%21 to 30 years: 20.8%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 31.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 22.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,713 reporting for every category shown · 1,713 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.7%1 to 5 years: 24.4%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.4%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.3%
  • Beginning 5.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.3%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Nesmith Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classNesmith Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten13.218
Grade 116.118.4
Grade 215.618.5
Grade 31819
Grade 41919.1
Grade 517.320

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043918103.