+5.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,748 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
490 of 1,748tied with 87 others
Score vs region
+7.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
99 of 352tied with 13 others
Score vs county
+4.6 ptsvs 82.4 average · 59 rated schools in Smith County
Smith County placement
22 of 59tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+6.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,644 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,335 of 4,644tied with 205 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,748 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,644 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
61%vs 52.5% avg · +8.5 pts
Masters
34%vs 22.6% avg · +11.4 pts
Among 1,686 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mozelle Brown Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,748 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 490th of 1,748 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 87 others).
Mozelle Brown Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 99th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 13 others).
Mozelle Brown Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.4 average for 59 rated schools in Smith County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 22nd of 59 rated schools in Smith County (tied with 3 others).
Mozelle Brown Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,644 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,335th of 4,644 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 205 others).
Mozelle Brown Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
School Progress85 B+3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,681 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+4.0 vs similar economic context · 1,666 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 1,644 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,681 reporting
Mozelle Brown Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,748 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (88), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level80%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
Meets grade level61%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
Masters grade level34%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,686 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Meets grade level64%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Masters grade level36%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,684 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 reporting
Meets grade level61%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 reporting
Masters grade level34%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,679 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Meets grade level50%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Masters grade level28%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,748 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
612
Economically disadvantaged
51.9%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.7%−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
27.9%+9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%−4.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mozelle Brown Elem
African American 20.2%
Hispanic 18.4%
White 48.8%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 6.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 reporting for every category shown · 1,748 in full cohort
African American 9.7%
Hispanic 42%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 35.7%
White 40.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,644 reporting for every category shown · 4,644 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
609
Economically disadvantaged students
316
Emergent bilingual students
47
Special education students
170
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
502
TEA-published mobility rate
13.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 612 students in 2025–26, an increase of 37 (6.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
612
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+37
Increase · +6.4%
Change since 2021–22
−37
Decrease · −5.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
612
Selected comparison
644.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Mozelle Brown Elem
School year
Students enrolledMozelle Brown Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
649
First available year
646.7
2022–23
612
Decrease of 37 (5.7%)
652.3
2023–24
590
Decrease of 22 (3.6%)
652.4
2024–25
575
Decrease of 15 (2.5%)
648.5
2025–26
612
Increase of 37 (6.4%)
644.7
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
44
7.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
86
13.67 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
629
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.0%
Selected comparison
12.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,359 rated schools reporting
−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
13.67
Selected comparison
27.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,462 rated schools reporting
−13.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Mozelle Brown Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
709
32
4.5%
68
9.59
9.8%
18.9
2021–22
717
50
7.0%
124
17.29
12.1%
27.1
2022–23
668
63
9.4%
135
20.21
12.7%
29.1
2023–24
672
32
4.8%
69
10.27
12.6%
29.2
2024–25
629
44
7.0%
86
13.67
12.2%
27.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Mozelle Brown Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
44
7.0%
86
13.67
12.2%
27.4
In-school suspensions
44
7.0%
79
12.56
11.0%
21.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Mozelle Brown Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,231
Selected comparison
$12,152
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
−$2,921 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,231 per student for this campus, $14,221 per student for its parent district, Whitehouse ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Mozelle Brown Elem
Parent district: Whitehouse ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,938
$24,241
$13,054
$7,863
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,676
$12,453
$13,108
$8,047
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,901
$10,251
$14,058
$8,576
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,345
$11,525
$14,797
$8,978
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,647 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,917
$12,702
$15,708
$10,256
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,657 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,480
$12,785
$16,792
$10,756
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,675 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,548
$13,988
$18,125
$11,676
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,231
$14,221
$18,972
$12,152
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$64,400−$2,323 vs similar economic context
Teachers
44+1.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.9−5.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mozelle Brown Elem
Beginning 9.2%
1 to 5 years 6.9%
6 to 10 years 32%
11 to 20 years 35.5%
21 to 30 years 14%
Over 30 years 2.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 reporting for every category shown · 1,748 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.7%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.1%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Smith County · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 28%
6 to 10 years 18.3%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,644 reporting for every category shown · 4,644 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Mozelle Brown Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classMozelle Brown Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
18
Grade 1
19.5
18.3
Grade 2
17.6
18.5
Grade 3
19.8
18.9
Grade 4
18.4
19.1
Grade 5
18.8
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
10of 57
Attendance
Smith County · of the 57 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 212906112.