Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Moody PK

McLennan County · Region 12: Waco · 37 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−1.3 ptsvs 82.3 average · 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
935 of 1,652tied with 64 others
B81

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Similar economic-disadvantage rate.

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Moody PK is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.3 average for 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 935th of 1,652 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Who this school serves
  5. Student counts behind the percentages
  6. Enrollment over time
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMoody PK 8181788281 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8182.3 1,652 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8282.6 1,625 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7880.5 1,599 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8181.1 1,580 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8183.6 1,558 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement—Not reported · similar economic context 82.1 · 1,598 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.7 · 1,593 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 79.6 · 1,580 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 76 · 1,564 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.3 · 1,593 reporting
  • Moody PK
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,652 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement—Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
37
Economically disadvantaged
48.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.1%−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.8%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Moody PK

African American: 10.8%Hispanic: 45.9%White: 40.5%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 10.8%
  • Hispanic 45.9%
  • White 40.5%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40%White: 42.6%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40%
  • White 42.6%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
37
Economically disadvantaged students
18
Emergent bilingual students
3
Special education students
4

TEA context labels

  • Highest grade is early education, pre-K or kindergarten

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 37 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 4 (9.8%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
37

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−4

Decrease · −9.8%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
37
Selected comparison
657.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,614 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Moody PK
School yearStudents enrolledMoody PKChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 43 First available year 657.2
2022–23 Not reported Not available —
2023–24 41 No adjacent prior year 662.2
2024–25 41 No change 659.2
2025–26 37 Decrease of 4 (9.8%) 657.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
41

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Moody PK
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 45 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 48 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 59 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 48 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 41 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Moody PK in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$4k$18k$33k20182020202220242025
  • Moody PK
  • Parent district: Moody ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$4,903
Selected comparison
$12,071

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

−$7,168 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $4,903 per student for this campus, $31,210 per student for its parent district, Moody ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMoody PKParent district: Moody ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$4,285$12,961$13,054$7,827 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,501 rated schools reporting
2019$4,988$14,138$13,108$8,015 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,520 rated schools reporting
2020$5,073$13,396$14,058$8,515 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,532 rated schools reporting
2021$5,059$15,046$14,797$8,914 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,550 rated schools reporting
2022$5,588$15,804$15,708$10,243 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 rated schools reporting
2023$4,710$16,541$16,792$10,740 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,579 rated schools reporting
2024$5,856$19,416$18,125$11,619 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,597 rated schools reporting
2025$4,903$31,210$18,972$12,071 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,623 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$64,450−$2,559 vs similar economic context
Teachers
2−40.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.5−1.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Moody PK

6 to 10 years: 50%11 to 20 years: 50%
  • 6 to 10 years 50%
  • 11 to 20 years 50%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,652 reporting for every category shown · 1,652 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.2%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.7%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 161910102.