Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Miller Grove School

Hopkins County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 314 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
−1 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+1.6 ptsvs 84.4 average · 1,329 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
616 of 1,329tied with 58 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.4 average for 1,329 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 63.2% avg · +2.8 pts
Masters
32%vs 28.6% avg · +3.4 pts

Among 1,289 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Current strength

Closing the Gaps above the similar-context average

86 +4.3 pts vs 81.7

  • 86 is 4.3 points above the 81.7 average among 1,276 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Academic Growth above the similar-context average

83 +5.1 pts vs 77.9

  • 83 is 5.1 points above the 77.9 average among 1,264 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Miller Grove School is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.4 average for 1,329 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 1 point since 2021-22.

Ranks 616th of 1,329 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 58 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageMiller Grove School 8784798786 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8684.4 1,329 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8784.6 1,300 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7982.9 1,278 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8483.5 1,266 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8785.3 1,247 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement86 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 1,290 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,286 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,276 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+5.1 vs similar economic context · 1,264 reporting
  • Relative Performance81 B+1.5 vs similar economic context · 1,286 reporting
  • Miller Grove School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,329 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement86B4
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance81B9

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level85%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,290 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,289 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,289 reporting
  • Masters grade level32%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,289 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,284 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,190 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 673 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 673 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 673 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,329 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
95.8%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
79.0%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria79.0%88.6%−9.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course10.5%60.7%−50.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA10.5%34.5%−24.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%13.6%−13.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course36.8%36.4%+0.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification31.6%37.9%−6.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.3%−1.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree21.1%4.1%+17.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.8%−5.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.8%−2.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student15.8%7.4%+8.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%3.3%−3.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 374 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
314
Economically disadvantaged
39.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.8%−6.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.1%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Miller Grove School

Hispanic: 14%White: 79.9%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 0.3%Pacific Islander: 0.6%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • Hispanic 14%
  • White 79.9%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 0.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,329 reporting for every category shown · 1,329 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 35.2%White: 46.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 35.2%
  • White 46.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
314
Economically disadvantaged students
124
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
44

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
280
TEA-published mobility rate
10%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 314 students in 2025–26, an increase of 4 (1.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
314

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+4

Increase · +1.3%

Change since 2021–22
+15

Increase · +5.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
314
Selected comparison
699.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,297 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Miller Grove School
School yearStudents enrolledMiller Grove SchoolChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 299 First available year 705.8
2022–23 317 Increase of 18 (6.0%) 710.4
2023–24 323 Increase of 6 (1.9%) 710.3
2024–25 310 Decrease of 13 (4.0%) 705.3
2025–26 314 Increase of 4 (1.3%) 699.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18

5.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
28

8.24 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
340

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.3%
Selected comparison
10.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,024 rated schools reporting

−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.24
Selected comparison
22.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,108 rated schools reporting

−14.6 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Miller Grove School
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 336 Suppressed — 11 3.27 — 16.5
2021–22 327 22 6.7% 37 11.31 10.8% 22.8
2022–23 335 21 6.3% 35 10.45 11.2% 24.1
2023–24 344 32 9.3% 74 21.51 10.9% 24.5
2024–25 340 18 5.3% 28 8.24 10.6% 22.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Miller Grove School in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 18 5.3% 28 8.24 10.6% 22.8
In-school suspensions 13 3.8% 18 5.29 9.5% 17.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Miller Grove School
  • Parent district: Miller Grove ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,689
Selected comparison
$12,036

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,301 rated schools reporting

−$1,347 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,689 per student for this campus, $19,289 per student for its parent district, Miller Grove ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearMiller Grove SchoolParent district: Miller Grove ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,856$11,250$13,054$7,786 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,188 rated schools reporting
2019$7,289$11,164$13,108$7,989 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,204 rated schools reporting
2020$7,958$12,246$14,058$8,350 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,212 rated schools reporting
2021$9,372$16,785$14,797$8,759 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,230 rated schools reporting
2022$11,957$17,440$15,708$10,107 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,248 rated schools reporting
2023$11,459$16,077$16,792$10,566 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,266 rated schools reporting
2024$11,254$15,956$18,125$11,771 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,279 rated schools reporting
2025$10,689$19,289$18,972$12,036 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,301 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$59,695−$7,723 vs similar economic context
Teachers
27−19.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.7−2.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Miller Grove School

1 to 5 years: 21.9%6 to 10 years: 10.8%11 to 20 years: 43.5%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 7.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 21.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 10.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 43.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 7.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,329 reporting for every category shown · 1,329 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.1%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.7%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Miller Grove School in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classMiller Grove School · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1818.2
Grade 11918.7
Grade 212.518.9
Grade 32719.6
Grade 41919.3
Grade 51220.8
Grade 611.618.2
Secondary English11.115.8
Secondary languages other than English1218.1
Secondary math9.616.8
Secondary science718.1
Secondary social studies7.618.1

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 181 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 14

    Attendance

    Hopkins County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

10 measures

  • 2of 14

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Hopkins County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 2of 13

    Reading — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 13

    Closing the Gaps

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 3of 13

    All Subjects — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 3of 13

    Math — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 11

    Academic Growth

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 3of 11

    Science — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

11 measures

  • 4of 15

    Overall score

    Hopkins County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 13

    All Subjects — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 45

    Earned an associate degree

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 5of 13

    Student Achievement

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 5of 11

    Science — Approaches

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 6of 11

    Science — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 11 that report this measure

  • 7of 45

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 45 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    School Progress

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Relative Performance

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 7of 13

    Math — Meets

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

  • 8of 13

    Math — Masters

    Hopkins County · of the 13 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 112907001.