Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
76 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTraditional public school campus
Mildred B Ellis Elem
Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 473 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 77/1002025-26
- Change
- +1 ptssince 2024-25
- Score vs similar economic context
- −7.2 ptsvs 84.2 average · 1,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 1,095 of 1,387tied with 43 others
- Score vs region
- −5.2 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
- Region 10: Richardson placement
- 808 of 1,157tied with 35 others
- Score vs county
- −9.4 ptsvs 86.4 average · 307 rated schools in Collin County
- Collin County placement
- 255 of 307tied with 6 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- −3.1 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,594 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 2,919 of 4,594tied with 128 others
- Score vs state
- −4.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 5,228 of 7,646tied with 203 others
C77
At a glance
The available rating history is moving up. The current score is below the 84.2 average for 1,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is below the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County.The current score is below the 80.1 average for 4,594 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
9.9% −2.7 pts vs 12.6%
- 9.9% is 2.7 percentage points lower than the 12.6% average among 1,342 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
76 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Chronically absent lower than the Region 10: Richardson average
9.9% −4.6 pts vs 14.5%
- 9.9% is 4.6 percentage points lower than the 14.5% average among 1,107 schools in Region 10: Richardson reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
76 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
76 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Academic Growth above the similar-size average
79 +3.3 pts vs 75.7
- 79 is 3.3 points above the 75.7 average among 4,307 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
9.9% −5.7 pts vs 15.6%
- 9.9% is 5.7 percentage points lower than the 15.6% average among 4,460 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 3 points
76 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureCurrent strength
Academic Growth above the Texas average
79 +3.3 pts vs 75.7
- 79 is 3.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas average
9.9% −6.8 pts vs 16.7%
- 9.9% is 6.8 percentage points lower than the 16.7% average among 7,358 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mildred B Ellis Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 84.2 average for 1,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 1,095th of 1,387 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 43 others).
Mildred B Ellis Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 808th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 35 others).
Mildred B Ellis Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 86.4 average for 307 rated schools in Collin County. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 255th of 307 rated schools in Collin County (tied with 6 others).
Mildred B Ellis Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.1 average for 4,594 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 2,919th of 4,594 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 128 others).
Mildred B Ellis Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2024-25.
Ranks 5,228th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 203 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | C | 77 | 84.2 1,387 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | C | 76 | 84.4 1,357 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Mildred B Ellis Elem
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,387 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 73 | C | 7 |
| School Progress | 79 | C | 1 |
| Closing the Gaps | 72 | C | 8 |
| Academic Growth | 79 | C | 1 |
| Relative Performance | 59 | F | 1 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (79), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 79.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,387 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 473
- Economically disadvantaged
- 40.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 11.8%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 25.4%+7.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.1%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 9.9%−2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mildred B Ellis Elem
- African American 7%
- Hispanic 35.1%
- White 53.9%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 reporting for every category shown · 1,387 in full cohort
- African American 9.3%
- Hispanic 35.6%
- White 45.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- African American 17.4%
- Hispanic 43.5%
- White 24.5%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 9.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison average For Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
- African American 13.7%
- Hispanic 22.2%
- White 31.3%
- American Indian 0.6%
- Asian 26.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,594 reporting for every category shown · 4,594 in full cohort
- African American 12%
- Hispanic 55.1%
- White 25.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.9%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 473
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 191
- Emergent bilingual students
- 56
- Special education students
- 120
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 46
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 317
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 14.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- 21
4.82 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 436
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 4.82
- Selected comparison
- 23.2
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 436 | Suppressed | — | 21 | 4.82 | — | 23.2 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | 21 | 4.82 | — | 23.2 |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | 17 | 3.90 | — | 17.8 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Mildred B Ellis Elem
- Parent district: Community ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $7,748
- Selected comparison
- $11,970
For 2025, TEA reported $7,748 per student for this campus, $18,880 per student for its parent district, Community ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Mildred B Ellis Elem | Parent district: Community ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $7,748 | $18,880 | $18,972 | $11,970 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,358 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $76,961+$9,560 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 24−21.6 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 19.5+5.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mildred B Ellis Elem
- Beginning 3.7%
- 1 to 5 years 26.7%
- 6 to 10 years 13.6%
- 11 to 20 years 34.2%
- 21 to 30 years 18.1%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,387 reporting for every category shown · 1,387 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.3%
- 1 to 5 years 23.4%
- 6 to 10 years 19.5%
- 11 to 20 years 30.9%
- 21 to 30 years 17%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.9%
- 1 to 5 years 29%
- 6 to 10 years 20.1%
- 11 to 20 years 27.5%
- 21 to 30 years 13.7%
- Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison average For Collin County · 307 reporting for every category shown · 307 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 29.2%
- 6 to 10 years 19.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 14.7%
- Over 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,594 reporting for every category shown · 4,594 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.1%
- 6 to 10 years 19.3%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 16%
- Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classMildred B Ellis Elem · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 19.7 | 18.1 |
| Grade 1 | 18.2 | 18.6 |
| Grade 2 | 23.3 | 18.8 |
| Grade 3 | 16.3 | 19.5 |
| Grade 4 | 23 | 19.3 |
| Grade 5 | 21.7 | 20.7 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043918106.